WHY WE DO? it's not about wearing the colors; it's all about learning the code.
OUR METHOD Easy to understand presentations & discussions for masses.
OUR VALUES - We discourage hate speech - We are driven towards Informed Following - We are researched based content deliverers - We are inclined towards learning, debating, understanding & implementing - Our Aim is to rescue every misguided soul & blind follower with logical, intellectual & meaningful efforts. - It's never about subscribers & likes, it about informing masses with authentic correct information. - We do not have any political agenda associaed to these - We shall not continue to comment / reply publically when we understand that issue is getting personal or someone is driving the discussion to serve own agenda which is not the cause / subject of any publication
" Brahmasutra" is not about creator deity 'Brahma'. It is a philosophical texts which concern with the idea of 'Atman and Brahman' and it relates to Upnishads. Brahman and Brahmā these are two different things. Braman is an ontological concept and Brahmā is a hindu diety who is not worshiped by Hindus nowdays. Diety Brahma is mostly occurred in Mythologies. (Puranas, hindu epics such as Ramayana and Mahabharata).
Brother, you are right. However, do read book of Abraham which is not about Abraham rather it is revelations upon him. My context in explaining the topic refers to copy of same same script. Same topics & same analogy way after Abraham's book. You are seconding my points. Thanks indeed
In early Hindu history "Concept of God" was not an important issue. If you read mimamsa, nyayasutra or other classical texts, you find that they were mostly concern with Suffering, Concept of self and valid means of knowledge and had very little to say about "God" or deities. It was the latter period when God as a supreme lord of world became a common theme known today as 'Bhakti Movement'. In this time period "Puranas" became important hindu scriptures. Ramayana and the Bhagavada Gita also became popular. Before that they didn't really have serious importance.
Knowledge requires 2 basic ingredients 1. Authentic Trail 2. Content Unfortunately, scholars of faith cannot provide continued trail as who told or wrote it and how it was passed on to next generation. When trail is disconnected & several centuries are missing then we cannot truly say that everything is true in scriptures. It is also well understood and acknowledged by Vedic scholars and even modern day scholars of faith. This is where anything & everything is possible here. Read yourselves and see the contradictions in every literature of faith. Very unfortunate but it is factual.
In Hindu tradition Knowledge is understood or defined as an mental episode (Pramā) that comes through a valid source of Knowledge. There are multiple sources of Knowledge accepted by different schools. For instance Nyaya accepts 4 sources- 1. Perception 2. Inference 3. Analogy and Comparison (Upmān) 4. testimony. Each source is considered more authentic then the preceding one hence testimony is least authentic.
@@GauravJha-mu5gv love to know about the authentic trail. It should be with names and their authority on subject. This is where mysticism lies. Thoughts, feelings, perception (personal account of witnesses) . Which I have narrated in video as a collective noun under mystical approach. You are saying the same. And this is the problem here, what different accounts, perceptions, testimony says it happens. You have second my opinion. Thanks.
@@path-finder-series No, Perception as defined by Nyayikas is not subjective. It must be same for all perciever. I think you're very misinformed about indian epistemology. I recommend you to Read 'Nyayasutra'. This text is considered one of the authentic text of Hindu Epistemology. There are many translations of it available on internet. I'm not defending Hinduism. I know there are many problems in it. I just want you to be aware of your misunderstanding regarding Hinduism.
@@GauravJha-mu5gv brother, the scriptures you are talking about are men written. Not divine. Like we have several scriptures which are men written, they also interpret religion way differently than what Quran says. They are men written so all 4 accounts which you are sharing are also mentioned there as well. Problem is they are men explaining the divine knowledge. Challenge in fellowship lies as how correct the concept is. What is said (content) is secondary, who said it (trail) is primary? It's a claim not proof. I think you should see a video from courses category it shares how information got corrupted. Many Muslim schools of fellowship are after me when they came to know about preservation, transmission and intellectual delusions in our own divine knowledge when men tied to post their opinion. It happens everywhere. Sad but a harsh reality. It has happened with sanatam dharam as well. I may be less informed but as a true student of ideological doctrines I do work unbiasedly. Trail is missing in literature of Hinduism, your priests admit it. So as preservation of original text. And two major mediums of messaging are missing (angels and prophets) which all other religions have. So, 4 angles define your knowledge set and it is well acknowledged by you. My validation of every account comes from cross reference study of scriptures. When I talk about Hinduism, I have read Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Sikhism, Taoism and Islam ... And every religion has literature written by scholarship which presents a school of understanding all masses believe it. It's everywhere. On Islam it is known as fiqah (which was strictly prohibited by original teaching of Islam) & there are saintly orders in Christianity and so on in every religion. So we refer divine text with trail & content. So, it's never one sided story. As I used to believe several things but when I studied, and found that these are men written literature and divine account is way different & much clearer. Just see my Mysticism & Islam video. I have made mess of Muslim doctrine bases upon religion presented by some scholarship of mysticism.
@@path-finder-series "What is said (content) is secondary, who said it (trail) is primary? it's a claim not proof." This statement clearly shows the mindset of people who follow abrahmic faith. For Hindus it matter most what is written rather than who wrote it. If the content resonates with our experience then it would be accepted but if it says something that is counter intuitive to our experience, it would be rejected doesn't matter who wrote it.
Kafir wajib ul qatal nahi hai, Quran ki aik ayat ko out of context sunaya jata hai, aik agreement ho tha aur uss ko mishandled ker kay specific kafir musalmano ko mara jata tha, yeh aayat sirif un kafiroon kay liyee thi jo yeh ker rahay thay... Agar kafir maar diyee tu musalmaan kis ko karain gay...
Buddy,😂 you lack basics of maths. Twice the speed of light nhi, squared the speed of light, meaning c×c. Apart from this, Extremely ill-informed. Pata nhi kaha se research kari hai, Pakistan based ho aap?
yes, in the fluency of answering the poundering questions one after another I made this mistake. It is "c x c = c2" not twice - you are right here. However, rest of the information is absolutely correct. It is not ill informed. It is unbiased research. Most of the Muslims also question me when I share unbiased research on Islam & its modern day practices. This information of Mystic practice is cross verfied from practices in other religions in whcih mysticism is practiced. In comming days i have scheduled sessions on Mysticism in Islam & other Abrahmic religions. Do watch those as well. Alomost entire research work presented here is from your own scholars & priests directly it is not "man gharat",
So wrong and ignorant 😂😂 India had philosophy and mysticism both, No prophethood but sainthood. India had written documents which were burned during Islamic invasions of Khilji. 6:30 Everything you said is wrong.
yes you are right, they have philosophy (intellectual explaination of their beleives) & mysticism both it is what i have described here, we are on the same page 🙂 & have no Prophethood. You are abosolutely right. The dcuments were lost way back in couple of centuries BCE. Khilji came in 13th Century CE. Did Khilji burnt every scripture at every place in Hind? his jouney & kingdom was limited to areas (western & northern hind). Review history.
I have an advice for you if you want to attack Hinduism in favor of your religion, as you are anyway duty-bound to do so. In Hinduism, an excessive reliance on scriptures is known as Shastra-vaasna: an obsession. Scriptures are an assist not an end. More belief is in notion of Karma, where good deeds wilp be rewarded with higher births and heavens, bad deeds with lower births and hells. And the notion of Bhakti, where the devotion is supreme. You must attack the deities for a greater reward. Plenty of material is already available.
I am not attacking Hinduism, thousands are there to do so. I am just introducing "informed following" for Hindus thats it. It is also been done for Muslims as well ... you know people argue ... I am commenting upon the knowledge management only, which unfortunately is not done. Your entire information is through such knoweldge which has been passed through to you. it is not your fault, you have only received and consumed it. Who were you in your last birth? any idea In Hindusim, as stated by you "Scriptures are an assist not an end, then if yes, then it is not system (deen) & according to your above statement it is just tradition, customs and rituals if not, then it should be the base of your existance & contradictory to your above statement it should be leading your entire life. Reflect, most of the beleivers do not think as you have stated above.
@@path-finder-series Is Islam devoid of traditions, cultures and rituals? Hinduism has a core, one doesn't call it Deen. It is called Dharma, implying order, duty, responsibility among various things.
@@yogiragingleo read it, huge disappointment, it looks like that few scholars have tried to make sense out of things ... there are better scripts present in Hindu scriptures. Lot of contradictions ... i think, you have just read you existing version, i would recommend that you should read the version of 1972 & 1983 of Bhawat Geeta, I have read all 5 versions from 1902, 1956, 1960, 1972 & 1983 if there is another, I do not know about it ... 541 out of 700 verses were changed (77%) in 1983 version when it was compared with 1972 version. 21 verses (3%) spellings, punctuation & capitalization. 520 verses (74%), words were removed, rearranged, or inserted. Chapter 17 (Shradhatray Vibhag Yog -The Divisions of Faith), 93% of the verses were changed source : Krishna Books ... now ask them, not me
@@yogiragingleo When ever culture meets religion, it makes different copy, here you are 110% right. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DRHgjkUCzsk.html&ab_channel=HTStudio here it is mentioned. The different stages of spritual adhearance i.e. Ideology, religion & system (deen) Dharma is called "Religion" & you are right about it. Ideology = definition of deity & worship doctrine Religion = idieology (worship doctrine) + traditions & customes Deen = idieology (worship doctrine) + traditions & customes + system (independent law) "Deen" is said to be the "Way of Life" Unfortunately, Islam is also not at all practiced / understood in its spirit & desi version of Islam is practiced in India & Pakistan, which is localized version of Islam (not actual Islam). Local molvi has not allowed everyone to read translation of Arabic Quran instead many of them (not all) narrated different interpertations of translations of sacred knowledge doing same as Hindu scholars did which comes under knowledge management part. That is why, beofre reaching out to non-muslims, "Informed Following" was first enforced on Muslims ... most of them also dont know what their religion requires from them ... Hope, I answer the query brother
Apaurusheya, meaning "not of human" or "impersonal, authorless", is a term used to describe the Vedas, the earliest scripture in Hinduism. I stumbled onto the video thinking it to be a scholarly channel, which as a Hindu we find no offense to in the culture of debate and dissemination as the Vedic thought say "let good thoughts come from all directions". I was proven wrong, as it turned out the usual Abrahamic trope. Contradictions are aplenty in Abrahamic scriptures too. But, to an insider it may make sense. Good for them, if it helps them lead a life they find happiness in. As an outsider, you have no right, no locus standi on other faiths.
It is what it is, Word of God / Revealed knowledge. However, changes have been in that too which is deliberate intellectual dishonesty as it cannot be authored. This is exactly my point here.
Every scripture which is human edited will have contradictions. Torah, Zaboor (Psalms) and Injeel are re-arranged in form of Bible (old & new testaments) again lot of human intervention is there. Original script missing in them as well and lot of localized information in that. My other work in development is on that. Thank you for making a point here.
@@path-finder-series If that is the case if Quran - the Word. Through God > Gabriel > Mohammed > Scribes who wrote ot down. How do you vouch for 4th hand account except for a leap of faith that any other anyways take for their beliefs. Either be a theologian or a scholar or a logician but not a mishmash of all. Don't be like I'll watch my religion from the lens of theology, for others, I will wear another set of goggles and analyze them from scientific and logical standpoint.
@@yogiragingleo very easy, there is an account in my next vedio which describes it. I am also giving proofs in that ... Your authentic scriptures (which are unfortunately got corrupted) came down same way. Did you know this? I thing that's the missing link. Only way to dig down this is search text of Quran in Arabic 1400 years ago , the mid way and today, not a single word changed. As far as the originality is concerned, you will see details in next one.
My concern is, when God was visiting earth in Hind and giving first hand knowledge; why He did special arrangement for people of Hind only and the most important part brother, who was doing His job when he was visiting Hind not once, so many times? So there are missing links here. We will talk in Concept of God in Hinduism, till then I am preparing content for Abrahamic Scriptures, knowledge management part. It will do justice
west se east nhi... east se west knowledge transfer hua h... bsdk...jab without context padhoge toh yahi hoga...tum kya janoge monotheistic wala.... quran mein toh humanity hi nhi h...katal karne ko bola jata h,laundi rakhne ko bola jata h...bsdk muslim mc
