Govt. of India approved a new program titled Global Initiative of Academic Networks (GIAN) in Higher Education aimed at tapping the talent pool of scientists and entrepreneurs, internationally to encourage their engagement with the institutes of Higher Education in India so as to augment the country's existing academic resources, accelerate the pace of quality reform, and elevate India's scientific and technological capacity to global excellence.
One way to consider oppositional concepts (the dialectic) as compared to positive forces that are not dialectically bound into oppositions: whereas concepts necessarily are dialectically-opposed, SPECIFIC FREQUENCIES are just what they are - positive forces in the fabric of reality. An analysis of brain activity can understand how the two hemispheres set up oppositional types of reality-experience, the actual brainwaves themselves are purely positive phenomena. The Monroe Institute's science of binaural beats is a way to show how hemispheric tendencies of DIFFERENCE (introducing different tones in the different ears) produce an altogether different type of tonal focus. (This may be a "Deluzian" type of technology that accelerates human development - or reveals its potential.) How concepts are made of tonal patterns is a matter that comes into view for understanding by way of exploring nonconceptual zones of experience - for example, the focus on a particular tone free from conceptual fixation. The mind will react with conceptual interpretation - all of which conceptuality is made of polarized oppositions. But the tone is a nonconceptual phenomena, that includes an innate concept (its Specific-Frequency, as known by Hertz measure, etc.).
This lecture is great. Please what textbook is he using as reference material for his lectures? For example, he mentioned page number 168 @ 38.31 minutes into the video, which text material is the page number in?
I think when he says that the schizophrenia Deleuze and Gattari are discussing is different from the medical diagnosis he is for the most part wrong. I think perhaps he is trying to make the subject more palatable for his students but he is effectively castrating the core of the philosophy. That quanta at a certain point affects qualia, a certain amount of the schizophrenia that capitalism produces and then names will cause that person to be hospitalized by other sufferers. The work is jarring, it’s not exactly a work that is safe, but that is precisely in my opinion why it is an ethically ‘good’ work, and one to be studied and understood, and rigorously applied to our epistemologies, certainly in physics and the health sciences.
Hi, I'm a mechanical engineering student from Unifi, (Florence, Italy). I am doing research on these topics and have taken your recorded course. I noticed for some further information it is referred to a book, could you tell me the name? thank you
to be honest, it made little sense but I guess there's no time to really strip this down enough to enable the remedial section to grasp what's what first time round. But I would like to add that the previous lecs in this series have been great in this respect!
Hello. Thanks for these amazing lectures. I have a question that I appreciate it if someone could help me with. Could someone explain a bit about what he says at 24:40 time? What I get is that nucleation reduces the amount of lagb and covert them into hagb. He also says that strength increases due to the Hall-Petch relation, which makes me think of a grain ( or cell/subgrain) size reduction. My question is, where does that cell size reduction come from during nucleation?
Hi Dr Park, thank you for the very informative video. I was wondering why you referred to Synchro as a Macroscopic model. I believe it's analysis is purely analytical as opposed to T7F which utilizes Macroscopic models in its analysis and optimization. Can you shed some light on this?
I emailed Professor Widder about the issue, and he is aware of it, but there is nothing that he can do. He has however recorded a 6 part lecture on Anti-Oedipus for a class that he taught. I've been listening to it, and it is just as good--I would say even better--as the rest of this series. Hopefully, this would be a good substitute for people: ru-vid.com/group/PLQuGsamIQkwqqwaPygwQR43165ZhqEKqR
A dog perceives things in a why, we can perceive things in a different way but not only that, science allows us to extend our perception. There's no rational reason to suppose we are the ultimate perceptors and that we see things for what they are. It doesn't make any difference in the everyday world but it's not that simply as you put it
