Yes I am using a welding mask to look through my telescope at the sun. When I looked at it with my eyes I use sunglasses as well as the welding mask's filter to protect my eyes. Even though the light that shines through the telescopes eye piece is sufficient enough to burn like a magnifying glass would do by carefully using the welding mask and glasses I am able to look at the sun very clearly and when focused I can see the sun spots clearly as well as see them moving around and interacting with each other throughout the day as the sun moves across the sky. I wanted to share what I see when I use my telescope while looking at the sun so I got my phone out and made this video to share online.
Hmmmmmm. As professor and chartered member of the Sun followers fan club of scientific study of the sun, I and my esteemed scientific colleagues have come to the conclusion that you are observing the sun VIA sun filters through your refractor telescope. This is indeed an exciting time in our current time frame to be observing the sun, because it is very hot on the surface of the sun and obviously not a good place to live. Thank you for sharing your observation of this massive orb of fire. Fascinating!
Yes I am using a welding mask to look through my telescope at the sun. When I looked at it with my eyes I use sunglasses as well as the welding mask's filter to protect my eyes. Even though the light that shines through the telescopes eye piece is sufficient enough to burn like a magnifying glass would do by carefully using the welding mask and glasses I am able to look at the sun very clearly and when focused I can see the sun spots clearly as well as see them moving around and interacting with each other throughout the day as the sun moves across the sky. I wanted to share what I see when I use my telescope while looking at the sun so I got my phone out and made this video to share online. I'm happy you liked this video and I can make more videos like this if you and your colleagues like me to. Some days I can see many sun spots and some days I can see really big sun spots if there are conditions that your study group would like me to look for please let me know and I will record and post up more videos on days I see the sun in conditions that your group desires. thanks again and have a nice sunny day :)
I just picked up a really cool vintage bug zapper called "the D bugger" made in Wisconsin in the 1970's Looks like a heavy duty bird cage with a metal barn roof look to it.
Love it!! Hope you keep the kids and drunk friends away. Just built my own. But used a old flowtron upside down for a cage. It will kill a innocent or a dummy in a hurry. Gotta keep some safety in mind.
Dark places on the sun that absorb light rather than emit it. It's a mystery and strange something as bright as the sun would have dark areas like that.
I too have found some of these oldest demonstrations to be the most informative. Transmissions, differentials, other physics concepts laid bare - plain and simple. Sometimes simple is simply the best..
Ahhhh, they just don't quite mansplain(silly sarcasm) like they used 2... BACK in the good ol dayz of yester-yore. Twas the absolute most thorough explaination.. ever needed. Thanks Dad. 🙏🏼💫
A couple of things! The idea behind fusion power is to use the fusion (merger) of atomic nucleus to generate usable energy. For this to happen the output energy needs to be greater than the input energy. So far - fusion have been achieved - but not in a way where the output energy exceeds the input energy. The energy levels required to reach fusion are extreme - 100's of millions of degrees. (C/F/K - does not really matter). Essentially the atoms needs enough energy that they can collide with enough force to fuse into a new heavier element - instead of just being deflected away from each other (which is why you do not fall through the floor when you walk on it). One error in your video - pushing electrons into the atom is pointless. An atom with more (or less) electrons does not make a heavier (or lighter) element. That would just be ionization of the nucleus. You can technically push an electron into a proton - but then you get a neutron (this is why there are neutron stars and no "proton" stars - all protons gets electrons "pushed into them" and turn into neutrons). And a nucleus where a proton is converted to a neutron would give us a lighter element (it is the number of protons that determine what the element is). So - you need the nuclei to collide. I.e. if you smash hydrogen into hydrogen - you would end up with helium (this is the main fusion process in the sun) - and a lot of released energy. As I understand it there are several practical problems (this is my amateur level understanding of it): #1 Any matter at a hundred million degrees - if it were to touch anything would instantly vaporize that "thing". Also the matter that you need to reach super high temps - would lose temp quickly if it were to touch anything. Thus you need vacuum and some sort of levitating confinement. #2 Then, as you heat matter up, it wants to expand. A lot. Anything would turn into a gas - then into a plasma (atoms with more of fewer electrons than normal). Ever expanding and pushing outwards with enormous force. This also makes problem #1 more difficult. The confinement needs to be strong (probably why magnetic superconductors etc are used for this). #3 To heat the matter efficiently. You cannot touch the stuff. Any sort of flame is just not hot enough. Electrons do not carry enough energy AFAIK. Laser pumping works (this is already been done experimentally) - but current lasers (the size of huge buildings!) can only provide the energy needed for a split second. Magnetically induced heating also works - this is how the various tokamak designs works (or is intended to work) as I understand it. Also one must make sure the heat is confined. If heat is lost too quickly - the needed temp will not be reached (or held). This is one of the main problems currently as far as I know. You achieve fusion - then the process stops after a very short time as temp drops. #4 Extracting the heat to be used. To make any use of the fusion reactor one also needs to get the heat out - i.e. to run a steam turbine or similar. But this needs to be finely regulated. Too much heat lost and the process shuts down. Also - your idea of shooting electrons - would have another problem. Electrons follow magnetic lines (this is how old CRT screens work). Thus shooting an electron beam through those magnetic rings holding the plasma in place....I think just would not work (the beam would be scattered or way off target).
I really appreciate you spending the time to respond to my videos, your logic behind everything you say makes very good sense to me. It also helps me by you identifying the problems in the theories that I have and propose. You are correct about using electrons to cause a fusion reaction and that it must be protons that needs to be used to fuse into helium like out sun does to make a successful fusion. The design I proposed could it be done using protons instead of electrons being shot at the center of the apparatus again using super conducting electric magnets to hold the protons in place then feeding more protons into its core and with enough electromagnetic pressure force them into fusion? To me it makes sense to have a machine that not only holds the particles in 1 spot but at the same time provide the pressure to cause these particles to fuse by inducing pressure to the particles in the same spot. I understand that this is a very ruff idea and there are many holes when it comes to describing a machine of all technical angles to demonstrate a fully functional machine. But from what I know about fusion is that it happens in the cores of all stars and at the cores of all stars there is extreme pressure along with intense heat all pushing down on a single point in its center and thats why this idea to push particles into 1 spot and keeping them there with electromagnetic pressure possibly pushing the particles together to create fusion makes most sense to me. This was the basis of this idea to use these Helmholtz coils in this way. As for constructing the part of the machine to extract energy from the fusion reaction I have not yet worked out but your peer review is more then welcome for comment and thank you for taking the time to type out and explain in full detail the parts of this idea that I did not consider or that are flawed for me to then think over and rereview my thoughts and work on the topic again. Thank you @jarls5890 for your detailed response to my video.
@@TheZafootz I like playing around with ideas a bit. And I always had great interest in the "natural sciences". Still, I am just an amateur - but I think I got a fair grasp of the complexity of some of these problems (and realize that they are far to complex for me to have a chance at solving). I got friends who have Phd in plasma physics and nuclear physics. And to hear those guys talk in detail about some of their work - it is incredibly complicated and impossible for me to follow. All I know is...I know very little! However I have studied astronomy and related topics at uni. And I still remember parts of the lectures about solar fusion and nucleosynthesis. A star (including our sun) - is essentially governed by two forces in opposition: Gravity trying to cram the giant ball of gas into the smallest possible object - and nuclear fusion pushing back. So a star is in a constant tension between gravity pulling in - and fusion pushing out trying to explode the whole thing. Proton beams do exist. They are used in advanced cancer treatment at hospitals (still not very common). And the Large Hadron Collider (at CERN) and other particle accelerators are in essence proton beam machines. And you know the size of those things! And still - they only produce bursts of beams. Nothing continuous (although such machines do fuse new elements - this is how the ultra rare, short lived elements are discovered). But I guess the main problem is even these giant machines only produce point like beams. This would not be enough to "get fusion going" to the point you could use it as a practical power plant. However getting protons into the system is not a challenge in itself i guess. Protons exists in all matter - in fact it IS matter. Thus - I would think that a high energy laser...x-ray laser or gamma ray laser would be better suited to "pump" energy into the system. Containment and energy extraction is still a big challenge. Just as a trivia; Are you aware that the so called H-bomb, the thermonuclear hydrogen bomb is a fusion bomb? That is the kind of energies we are talking about. The amount of matter that is actually fused is only a few grams (on the order of pea size). And to get the fusion going in such a device - they use a "regular" A-bomb that acts as the primer. It is the x-ray radiation pressure from the A-bomb that compress the fissile material (through a complex arrangement of lenses and reflectors) until fusion is achieved. This is part of what one tries to recreate and tame in a fusion reactor.
You are misunderstanding the part about holding a flame to the wire. It is not the light from the flame that causes the effect - but the ionized gas around the flame due to the heat from the flame (this is why they need to attach a wire in the first place).
Ah ok thank you for that correction. The main point of the old army video I'm pointing out was how they describe the photoelectric effect caused by x-rays. It is not the same as described by Einstein that he was given a Nobel Prize for. If the explanation they make in the old army video differs from Einstein's then why was he given a Nobel Prize for it?
@@TheZafootz I think the army video is quite simplified - and Einsteins theories goes beyond what is shown in the video. This is a summary of what Einstein proved: "In 1905, Albert Einstein published a paper advancing the hypothesis that light energy is carried in discrete quantized packets to explain experimental data from the photoelectric effect. Einstein theorized that the energy in each quantum of light was equal to the frequency of light multiplied by a constant, later called the Planck constant. " and "Einstein's work predicted that the energy of individual ejected electrons increases linearly with the frequency of the light. The precise relationship had not at that time been tested. By 1905 it was known that the energy of photoelectrons increases with increasing frequency of incident light and is independent of the intensity of the light. However, the manner of the increase was not experimentally determined until 1914 when Millikan showed that Einstein's prediction was correct." Up until this point it was thought that energy was on an "infinite sliding scale" and that energy was "infinitely divisible". Einstein essentially proved that light (and thus energy) is quantized...or in certain steps..where no energy level can exist between those steps. I.e. where we get "Quantum" in "Quantum physics" from. Also check out "Ultraviolet catastrophe" - which was solved by this.
@@jarls5890 does this mean there is a maximum frequency and a lowest possible frequency light can be emitted as? I always suspected there was a lowest possible frequency but I didn't think the was a maximum possible frequency when it came to Gama rays....
@@TheZafootz I am no sure. Weird things seems to happen at either extreme. The upper limit is very, very high - far higher than any gamma ray burst detected to date. On the low end - low frequency light is what we call radio waves. Very, very long waves. I am not sure what happens when the wave has so little energy - if it then starts to blend in into the background noise of the universe - perhaps disappearing into the constant background noise of the quantum foam or some such. Also keep in mind that the frame of reference would play a role here - i.e. the Doppler effect. The position and speed of the observer would then need to be taken into account as well as it would shift the frequency up and down all depending.
@@jarls5890 Yes I agree, light at low end of the spectrum would eventually blend in with the background radiation and dissipate with enough time and distance traveled. As for the expansion of the cosmos I feel that there isn't enough data showing the connection of galaxies size/distance and the speed in witch they are moving away from us. There is data showing galaxies distance and speed that they are moving away from us but no where in the data do they collect the size of the galaxies along its distance and speed. I have a hunch that if we were to measure 2 different sized galaxies(1 big and 1 small) that are at the same distance away from us, the bigger of the 2 galaxies will be moving away faster then the smaller one. The connection has been made that the farther away a galaxy is the faster they tend to be moving away from us but I feel this data is incomplete. If data was collected as for the size of the galaxies along with their distance and speeds they are moving this would show some sort of connection between galaxy size and speed in witch they are moving away from us. But without data one cannot be certain ......
I think there is some editing trickery there. I think the person next to him is his dad (or brother if he has one) and is wearing a face mask. It's more likely the adults will wear face masks, especially Asian adults, as this is common whether during covid or not. The parents went on the ride with him and then filmed him on his own? My theory is one of the parents went on the ride with him (or one at a time) and they've spliced the footage of a parent with him and the footage of him on his own and made it look like it's the same ride. That's my take.
It is the same shirt. Yellow under the black sweater like shirt. It is not fake because when he is seen by himself, he is still looking at the kid and he is like talking to him, but there is no one there...
@@TheZafootz He's clearly looking at his father and straining to see passed his father and through the barrier to clock his mother with a slightly apprehensive look on his face - first go-around "Where's mum? There she is." Second or third go-around big smiles from him to both of his parents. He knows where they both are and is confident on the ride and enjoying it.
What if there was a server that had an Anti-Cheat that can do a full hard drive search for any cheat files that it has on its BadFiles, SuspiciousFiles, and HighlySuspiciousFiles list that it has? Most people I tell this to say to me "I dont want someone scanning my entire Hard Drive" and I explain to them that this Anti-Cheat does not read files , it looks for file names that are on its search list and logs what it finds showing the path to that file in a log file for the server admin to look over and decided if that player is allowed to play on the server or not. Every cheat for unreal is coded with a title for the cheat file it uses to run it. These names is what this Anti-Cheat would search for and if someone built and produced a new cheat with a new name all that would need to be done is the cheat file name would need to be added to the Anti-Cheats search file list and this would all that would need to be done to keep it up to date. But in this case of the 1 server that has players and 1/2 are using cheats, It is the Admins of that server that is allowing this because they care more about having as many active people on their server not caring if they cheat or not all they care about is taking all the active traffic left in the game and nothing more. Even after i showed them evidence of someone using an snap on aim bot in that server they still did nothing. So this full HD scanner Anti-Cheat is the best solution to have a server with all legit players and no cheaters but the few legit players left in the game seem to want to continue to play with these cheaters as well as that servers admins dont see to give a fuck. But when it comes to something like an ini setting that makes dodging easier to do is 100% not allowed but wall hacking, sonar hacking, frame rate hacking, bright skins hacking, all kinds of extra non default BS they allow but the settings I discovered not allowed. I'd rather play on a server that scans everyones HD's for cheats and proves to all the players there that everyone is legit vs Dictating what can and cannot be done by their personal preference..... to me its nothing but a stingy selfish joke in what is a for sure A DEAD GAME......
What makes it most obvious is the fact that he changes his movement direction at the same time I swipe over him, and I think this is playing at 1/4 speed ..... The odds of being able to do that 5 times in a row at full speed would be way beyond human means of reaching...
I started using an auto transformer along with it or VARIABLE TRANSFORMER that works like a dimmer switch by controlling the AC input voltage to the ignition transformer I show this in this video clip here..... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LwQoQ5hTZWk.htmlsi=cQGcaupgpSbu2XXy&t=182
you need to use the Multidodge mutator to have the dodges with no pause inbetween to move like I did in this video. Without multidodge then yes you get a second or so in between dodges
My Dad used to love these zap the bugs. Hours of entertainment for a retired engineer. Highly recommend it kept him out of the kitchen and under mom's feet when she was cooking dinner. Extends the run time of any marriage, fun for the family to. Buy today supplies are limited.
How does vibration create movement. It is the sound or photon that is moving. No sound no vibration. Thrust is the only movement. Momentum comes from thrust. Spinning comes from thrust and friction. All mass and matter spin due to friction. Friction comes from momentum against the outer barrier of that which is moving. A ball spins from throwing it in an atmosphere. The atmosphere creates friction. The outside of the universe cause friction as the universe moves. The universe moves from one day into the other. From today into tomorrow. From yesterday into today.
@@rafaelgonzalez4175 by striking something with a clapper for example can make a bell ring its one of the earliest produced movements done with electricity in man kinds history. You can also make a heavy rod or piece of metal that is hanging freely to rotate or vibrate, none of these require thrust. Thrust is usually only required to make a change in velocity compare to other traveling objects...
@TheZafootz you do realize by striking you are in fact using momentum to generate force. Wind creates momentum. Are you hanging the rod in a vacuum chamber? Because in and hovering over the surface of the earth is in an atmosphere that has wind.
@@rafaelgonzalez4175 The way I see it is if something is changing position from a location they were just at, then that is movement and something that vibrates as a whole is doing just that moveing from one prosition to another back n forth. And yes all momentum has to come from somewhere if not by ones own actions then it is with some artificial action done by the operator. In this case I'm referring to things that are artificially made to vibrate everything else in nature that vibrates is done so by an unbalance of natural forces like earthquakes or sudden release of preassure of something holding back these forces. And to conclude the study of movement as a universal whole then all natrual and artificial movements must be considered in the study.... what you are refering to is the study of the energy behind the movement and thats different then studying movement only especially when artiificial movement differs somewhat from natural movement. I dont see any natural electric motors or gas powered engines in nature so it differs to natures movements done naturally and thats what I am studying...
@TheZafootz Natural movement vrs artificial movement? Where does the idiocy come from. What is artificial? Movement certainly is not. Anything that moves whether it was engineered or imagined still has to follow thrust. Something can not just move artificially or otherwise. Keep capitalism alive and waste your money on artificial thinking.
Just how many of these Crackpots are there? Real Physics i contained within the EVIDENCE based Standard Model (a Lagrangian) -- The DATA is VERIFIED (look up the Higgs Field and Boson the LAST and BEST piece of the Solution) -- Learn Something!
