Hey, football fanatics! Whether you bleed your team's colors every Sunday or you're just diving into the world of American football, you've landed in the end zone of the perfect channel!
On Ball Star, we're all about breaking down the Xs and Os, celebrating jaw-dropping plays, and diving deep into the heart of America's favorite sport. From pre-game analysis to post-game highlights, we've got you covered like a cornerback on a wide receiver.
Expect a front-row seat to the latest NFL drama, in-depth player profiles, fantasy football tips that'll give you the edge, and a healthy dose of that good ol' gridiron spirit. Whether you're a seasoned veteran or a rookie to the game, consider this your digital locker room where football IQ is always on the rise.
Hit that subscribe button, buckle up those chinstraps, and join us on this thrilling journey through the gridiron. Let's huddle up and make every down count together!
The Colts REALLY wanted Elway, but Elway didn't want the Colts so it forced their hand to doing something else... I would have done the same thing to get something for him also
2001 pats were legit terrible take. I mean look at the dudes on that defense. Lawyer Malloy, Ty Law, Willie Mcginist, Mike Vrabel, Tedy Bruschi, and Richard Seymour key guys in their dynasty. Not to mention Troy Brown who had a pro bowl year with a young Brady and Matt Light.
Bruh said “49ers traded Trey pushing them back and having them wonder if” as if Brock didn’t take them to the NFC championship that year and led them to a SB appearance
what a lazy video. the script is the same for every qb, all that changes is the names and stats. images don’t match what’s being said either. poor quality and not worth the watch
There is so many things wrong in this video that I really don't know where to start. I don't criticize videos, I'm not that guy, but my man let's get some facts straight.
I only made it to the 3rd trade. When saying the Colts passed on John Elway, when they actually drafted him? And he wasn't going to play for them. Getting anything, even a ham sandwich, for a player who won't play for you, is a win.
in no way did the 49ers trade for Trey Lance set them back, they literally went to the Super Bowl last year, and had the best roster on paper. Stupid video
They traded several picks up to draft Trey Lance, he was terrible and they got saved my Mr. Irrelevant. They could have won those Superbowls with the picks they gave up to get Lance. It's a terrible trade and terrible pick
@@TheZackypoo101lol or could’ve lost you have no clue your just yappin away they got lucky Fs getting purdy n makin the superbowl but to say it set them back is actually laughable
@@Itshevyhart No where in that bumbling incoherent response was there even close to a an intelligent thought. I reward you zero points and we are all dumber for reading your response.
You said “7 touchdowns” when showing RG3’s stat line for that year instead of “7 turnovers” cause that’s what the stat was. You made this video, edited it, hopefully went back over it a final time, and still hit upload with all these errors lol.
Even when the facts are correct he leaves a lot of additional information out. Idk if the stats on Hopkins are correct or not but I am not going to research it to confirm or deny it. I know Hopkins put up numbers and that’s the bottom line. The thing is he left out how this affected the Texans by having fans give up on the team and how even JJ Watt said adios to the Texans.
I clicked on this video assuming it was from a bigger channel. I watched the whole thing still thinking it was from a bigger channel. I think that says a lot. Keep up the nice work!
RG3, first of all he didn't rush back from injury, coaches rushed him. They pressured him to return early. 2nd, his game didn't change, defenses did and again, his coaches did noting to adjust. RG3 could have had a great career if his coaches knew what they were doing, RG3 wasn't a 1 trick pony, his coaches were which lead to him having sever injuries. Anderson was picked in the 6th round... not a UDFA.
why run when you can throw. the rules are slanted against the defense to defend the pass. allow linebackers and DB's to hit/cover like they did in the 90's and you'll see the running back become more valued.
Simple economics. 1) They are a dime a dozen. Supply far outstrips the demand. 2) Due to the constant punishment they take, they have very short playing careers. Very few RB's make it to that point in the career of a professional athlete, where they start to get their highest salaries. That being said, why should an owner break the bank for a RB, when he can get a new one virtually every year for the league minimum, and use the money to fill other more important spots on the team?
They the only guys who gets BLOCKERS majority of times when in play with the ball. This aspect has a lot to do with them getting less than QBs, WRs, etc. Management based this factor in of their pay rate when making those NFLPA Contracts of how players get paid by this order.
Ezekiel Elliot is just as good as if not better than any other running back in the NFL. It's not him who is the problem. The running back position as a whole is being undervalued in the new NFL climate. I'm surprised college players even still want to play the position. In this new NFL climate, a running back is lucky to play five years in the league. Three of those years are under a rookie contract. It's a sham.
