Warum braucht eine Magico M 500 Stunden einspielzeit? Warum nur stärkste Endstufen? Warum nur feinste Anlagen als Zuspieler? Warum sind Magice so schwierig aufzustellen? Warum werden dem zahlendem Kunden solche Hürden auferlegt? Warum für eine Magico M 7 fast 500.000 Euro ausgeben und all die schwer zu nehmenden Aktionen auf sich nehmen? Alles Fragen über Fragen.Ich für mich finde diese Lautsprecher Hammer,,aber leider maches es andere auch Hammer wie z.B Wilson Audio als direktester Gegenspieler aus dem gleichen Land .Ich nehme nicht die M 7 sondern die Alexx v ,für den Rest des Geldes kaufe ich mir eine gut klingende Anlage dazu und eventuell noch einen Kleinwagen für Mutti.. wetten das die Magico und die Wilson ganz dicht beieinander liegen ,egal bei welchen Modellen ?
Every time you tap and thread a part you build your own future tambourine. Some manufacturing genius said the best part is no part. Also save about 290 tons of chips!
Впервые удалось послушать акустические системы MAGICO серии М ,на выставке HI FI HI End show 2024 , 23 марта. Жизнь поделилась на до .. и прсле. Акустические системы Magico по сути и являются музыкальными инструментами высочайшего уровня.
A bit disappointing that we didn’t see a few steps around: Prototype; measure response and evaluate; modify design until perfect desired response achieved. Seems buyers are paying for a nice head office, I’d rather see a full measurement suite rather than a nice lobby!!
Hi 👋, very very nice, in search of perfection, Especially when it comes to making the perfect cup of coffee, 😂, I am listening to this on my handbuilt, 40-year-old transmission line loudspeaker cabinets , I just recently updated the driver units and crossovers, SEAS , 150w , your music territorial, came across excellent, good sound quality, if I ever win the lottery, I will definitely consider a pair of these speakers, 🔊 cabinets, But first of all I would need to Repair my leaking roof, and turn my attic space into a very very large music room, which I think would be amazing, It is approximately 7 1/2 m in width and approximately 12 m in length, with a pitch height of just over 7 m , Thank you for uploading your territorial On, showing how you manufacture your cabinets they do look amazing, 70+ years young, retired living in a very old Moulin in France .
They're the F1 equivalent of the speaker world, but with the power of a Top Fuel Dragster. If a set of Focal Diablos are the Saturn 5 rocket, these are Alien spacecrafts. What I'm trying to say is these are special. If some day my stocks do really really well or I win over 30 million dollars a pair of M9 Carbons might just be a purchase i'd make. They're 1.5 million dollars in Australian money though. Can speakers be heirlooms?
Some of the best speakers made if you have very deep pockets. Love their design philosophy which contains no faery dust or foo nonsense, just technically very competently designed and built. As a speaker designer and small time manufacturer myself It’s as breath of fresh air to see a company like this👍
A passive loudspeaker, is not the ultimate loudspeaker in sound quality, the best made active designs like ATC SCM ASL sound better than passive loudspeakers.
Most individuals could likely get better results toward state of the art playback by pursuing an active platform. But a 1%er like Alon Wolf and his team, could most likely extract more performance passively. Active has its advantages, no question. What's most important is the end result. Both approaches can result in superb in room playback. Both approaches possess potential pitfalls if not well executed. I'm guessing the challenges of passive elements, ie., insertion loss, ELI the ICE man, magnetic interactions, microphonics, component hysteresis, etc., have all been adequately managed vis-à-vis a state of the art active monitor counterparts. End result is all that matters at this level. I'll admit active, DSP'd, small inexpensive monitors offer EXTRAORDINARY performance for the money. Aside from my big primary system, I've got a mixing/editing, mastering system. I picked up a set of ~$200 each JBL 308P... and what they've done is incredible. $200!?? 8" two-way, active, biamped, DSP aligned/contoured, low diffraction baffle... amazing! A power supply, dsp, chip amp, feeding two drivers, in a modest cabinet... Economy of Scale, leveraging decades of Harmon research, over seas mfg... we're fortunate. Magico's owner's manuals probably cost more to make than one of these JBLs!
at Goodwins High end I heard in their “Big Room” they had M5s with spectral dma 500 monoblocks and the dmc30sv pre and dcs vivaldi stack and it was not only holographic but that holography was thick like I could reach out and touch the sound. It was in some ways cooler than hearing a live performance…..
That's why they sell hundreds of pairs a year. Just because you are a loser doesn't mean everyone else is. There is no such thing as overpriced if the market supports it. If the speakers were overpriced no one would buy them and Magico would be out of business.
..Very nice ..but remember all use woofers and tweeters that follow the laws of physic's.. just like all others , but now best in world build and computer design and manufacturing never seen before ..would ne a joy to own
I never quite understood the logic of making a speaker out of aluminum, which rings like a bell. Yes, it's stiff, but would require heroic effort to damp vibrations, as well as being incredibly expensive and difficult to machine. Why not use a more inert composite material?
@@jonathanginofilippi EVERYTHING vibrates and has a resonant frequency. Thicker aluminum would just raise the resonant frequency. Ever hear of a musical instrument called a vibraphone? It's bars are made from aluminum and it can ring for a LONG time.
@@squishymittens1125 I wouldn't use a mill or bit that long. And I'd make sure I'm on top of that hole and as close to the box as possible . . But, that should be done in a press or guided drill for sure .
Exactly I came to comment about the technique, saw your comment... yep, that's just no bueno. That person is unnecessarily using their core, little strength, poor control. Better would be a pushing type effort, employing arm, shoulder, chest muscle groups. Ideally, using elevation and using one's weight for the primary effort... then the strength goes primarily to control of the tool. I've drilled my share of holes;) I don't believe I ever encountered anything to take exception to w/Magico.
Lossy, flat, less dimensionality, colored, boxy resonance, dramatically less smoothness and ease. Cornwalls are a fine product, but compared to a refined offering like Magicos, the difference would be stunning. Likely the biggest takeaways; - smoothness and ease... - dimensionality, 3D...
