Consider to subscribe if you are interested in CAD/CAE/CAM and VR/AR/MR.
On this channel, I share my knowledge and experience with you. If you want to learn tips and tricks for software, like Blender, CATIA, Solidworks, 3ds Max, Unity, and Unreal Engine. I also share tips and tricks for creating amazing 3D art using AI tools.
Whether you're a beginner or an experienced artist, I hope that my content will inspire you. Consider to subscribe to 3D Comparison and join me on a journey of 3D creativity!
For a faster workflow - check the following video - CATIA V5 - Golden Cat Statue. This makes use of the powerful Quick Surface Reconstruction Workbench in CATIA V5
I have addressed this within my newest video - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bZAkdbttt7s.html I would still recommend the automatic surface workflow if you have that workbench within CATIA V5
Sorry for the late reply, I haven't received any new notification regarding that comment and I have noticed that you added the question 9 days ago. Send me the screenshot at 3dcomparisonstuffs@gmail.com and I will make a video regarding the parameters added to the geometrical set. I am really curios how the heat treatment, surface treatment and other parts appear within the geometrical set.
Showcases the use of 3D meshes as reference within Catia V5. Further then that if you use a 3D mesh you can extract surfaces from the existing reference and use them within your 3d model.
I saw so much blueprint catia videos on youtube. However, ıwant ask this, what's the better blueprint software ? I want do draw and design F-16 and MMU Kaan TF-X 3D. But ı not desicion which can ı use design software. I think catia is bad about this job. is it? What's your think?
Thank you for the comment. My experience regarding Piping in CATIA V5 is quite limited as I mostly use other workbenches from it. But I can try to approach some of the features and create some videos.
@@3DComparisonThanks, I will be waiting for it. Also, whole icons (pad,pocket and etc. ) seems as blurred. My screen has a high resolution (higher than 1920x1080).
@@3DComparison Especially, when i was sketchin in part design module, points are so small for example; When i am trying to user pattern a hole with sketch, i need to use point by clicking but these points are really really look small.
This video was mostly intended for CAD users. And applying a fillet in CAD is completly different. Also within a 10 video second you can't discuss additional parameters associated with bevel. Bevel substitudes both Chamfer and Fillet from CAD solutions.
Hello, I can do 1 on 1 coaching using screen share / microphone. Consider to give me an email at 3dcomparisonstuffs@gmail.com with more details of you specific needs. Are interested in Part Design/Assembly/Drafting or other more complex workbenches such as Sheet Metal /Surface Design / Mold tools or others.
I agree, I still use SolidWorks 2021 on my PC with 970 and I rarely encounter problems. Do you receive Graphical Card notifications within SolidWorks Resource Monitor? Usually SolidWorks requires RAM and that's the bottle neck, not the VRAM of the GPU (if you are not rendering or applying shaders elements within the viewport). I have addressed your comment in my recent video - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YVFzKJCbyv0.html
@@3DComparison it's pretty good I'm probably exaggerating a little. I usually only experience lag and occasionally crashing on larger assemblies. My PC at work has 16 gigs of ram, gets the job done well forsure just wish sometimes things would load quicker and whatnot at work. Makes me wonder how it was way back when. Cool video by the way, I just graduated for mechanical engineering and found it very interesting how the software looked a long time ago.
Congratulations on graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering! I graduated in 2010 and SolidWorks hasn't really changed much since then, CATIA V5 even less!
Could you share expert user or admin user catia settings ? It may be useful for many people. Example: PDF settings, IGS settings, DXF file settings, Create a Drafting special standard and content. 3D iso standard Thank you for all videos. I'm following you every time. Although, Even if I don't write a comment.
Thank you very much for taking the time to write a comment, it means a lot for the RU-vid algorithm. I will make videos regarding this within the near future as there are many settings and changes that need to be done differently then the defaults CATIA V5 settings for each file format.
@@3DComparison thank you. Can you please plz make a detail video about how to add part no. heat treatment, surface treatment and related part notes as parameters in a geometrical set ? I have worked on many cad models which includes all details as parameters in geometrical set. But I didnt succeed to do it by myself.
Hello first of all thank you for all of your videos. Could you make a tutorial for trim command in Generative shape design sometimes using it can be hard and I am having a hard time using it? Thank you.
@@3DComparison All good, I thought this was Cinebench 2024...and that was GPU at 29k haha - I'm getting similar settings, but I did undervolt and now getting a little higher numbers ... waiting for it to finish
I haven't noticed that they remove it WRL file import in Blender 4.2. Guess they considered that it's a legacy file format and is no longer used/needed. Thanks for the comment, this is an interesting find!
Dude, why so complicated. Just install GS and add the lib folder to "Path" - DONE! No need to extract, combine bin+lib, create c:\gs and the gs sys env variable, semicolon divider, nvidia line (wtf?) etc. etc.
Thank you for prepared this video by you and for my question answer. Everythinks ok. But, if we using surface standard parts, will have light assembly and faster catia. Can we say this?
Yes, using surfaces makes it lighter overall, but for various applications it is easier to work with solid bodies. You can always generate the surfaces starting from solid bodies using the multiple extract feature.
I want to ask you a question about catia. Question 1: Does having only a solid model of a standard part, such as a bolt, or having all the features under the model make the catia file lighter? Which one is useful for large assemblies? 2. Question: Is it lighter and more performant if the same standard part, such as a bolt, is a solid model or just a surface model?
Hello, that is a very good question. I have decided to give this a try and see what files are lighter and offer better performance. I have addressed this within my recent video - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_v1K565lyOk.html. I have also compared CATIA V5 to SolidWorks in terms of STEP file usage and CATIA has the stronger lead regarding this.
Hello, I have made a video regarding this. This time I used CATIA as the CAD software. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wNG7aqUal9U.html here is the workflow presented within a previous video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n72hza1LIqg.html
Glad to hear! I also prefer to use SolidWorks for these type of tracing operations compared to CATIA V5 or Fusion 360. You can also use vectors to automate this.
