Welcome to Cosmos Connect, your gateway to unraveling the universe's most fascinating secrets and mysteries. Our RU-vid channel invites you on a mind-expanding journey beyond human perception. Join us as we venture into the ethereal depths of the cosmos, uncovering the enigmatic wonders hidden from the naked eye. Through our thought-provoking and visually stunning series, we delve into the captivating phenomena that shape our universe. From mesmerizing celestial bodies to elusive cosmic events, we bring you closer to the secrets within the vast expanse of space. Prepare to be captivated, inspired, and awestruck as we unlock the mysteries of the unseen cosmos. Subscribe to our channel and embark on an extraordinary voyage of discovery, exploring the uncharted territories of the universe. This RU-vid channel is your premier destination for fascinating facts, breaking news, and intriguing rumors from the worlds of science, technology, and the universe.
Many of their interpretations are completely wrong about how and when the universe began, gravity, why large mass moves so fast, the look-back time prediction and more. What telescopes observe is not all that complicated. In reality the solution was quite simple. I came up with it way back in 2004. I tried to explain to NASA employees in 2010 why their interpretations were wrong about the universe and they argued with me, called me names, and even laughed. So, I stopped feeding their cognitive dissonance and instead, I wrote and published several books about how their interpretations were wrong. In the books I made several predictions about what the JWST would discover and how it would conflict and debunk their current theories and laws of physics. On page 48 of the paperback book SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY by RON KEMP I wrote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Then on page 147 in Conclusion I wrote quote, "With great distance there will be no Hubble constant discovered either. Every time they try and come up with a set value for the Hubble constant a different value will be deduced." I accurately predicted both the impossible early galaxy problem and the Hubble Tension in my books. I published the series before the JWST was launched in December of 2021. Sure enough, in the first CEERS survey astronomers discovered more than 300 old, massive galaxies as far as the telescope was able to see. Then in 2023 they began finding galaxies that were larger than our own Milky Way galaxy but further than 14 billion light years away. Not proper distance due to the expansion of space, but actual light distance. so they began calling them universe breakers. The solution was simple and explains everything, gravity, dark matter, dark energy, Hubble Tension, the age of the universe, how it didn't begin with a hot dense big bang, how it didn't inflate rapidly, why the cold CMB is not evidence of a hot big bang, black holes and so much more. Scientists always make things way more complicated than it has to be.
I hope Elon considers my idea of changing the aerodynamics of his new spaceship. All the existing shapes from take-off to orbit are fine, however, upon re-entry when the starship hits the atmosphere, flying swept-back wings appear which then move forward like the B-1 Bomber, which will enable the craft to make a slow-speed landing, similar to other commercial aircraft. No extra long runways are needed saving costs and infrastructures. It sounds insurmountable but if they start with the concept first, then integrate the cabin and rocketry around the wings. They might have to widen the craft to like the 'Spruce Goose' in size. Just a concept idea, where this 'Star Ship' can land amongst other commercial aircraft around the World.
I've always liked this concept and since Musk has made space launch far less expensive this may be plausible for the future, but between small numbers of passengers, weight being the most important factor, the cost of insurance (this will still be insanely dangerous compared to normal air travel), and the cost of a launch, this will ALWAYS be ridiculously expensive. Only the very elite will ever be able to afford such travel - which is fine, but people shouldn't be excited about getting to travel in this way.
The Voyagers were launched right after I turned 19 years old, I've been following them for a long time, for early 70s technology they are amazing, scientists say that the Voyagers won't be considered to be In pristine interstellar space until they pass through the Oort Cloud, Voyager 1 is travelling at 38,500 mph, and It will take another 300 years to reach the outer edge of the Oort Cloud, and 46,000 years to pass through, another cool fact is by the time Voyager-1s signal reaches Earth, It Is 20 Billion times weaker than a digital watch battery, It's also going to continue at that speed, that's 1 Million miles per day, they are destined to wander the Cosmos for eternity, they will orbit the Milky Way in 220 Million years, THX for posting. subbed 👍🇮🇹 🇺🇸
Salt water (sea water) is abundant but not fresh drinking water. In many large areas across the globe, fresh water is scarce. Bringing the cost of converting sea water to fresh water may, in the future be the solution to providing the huge amount of water to drive the enormous number of cars around the word. But for now, please, leave our precious and life essential commodity alone. We need it.
Calling an engine of this type 'A Water Engine' is far from the truth, it burns the components of water (Hydrogen & Oxygen). Breaking water into its components requires more energy than is available. The energy would be far more effectively used by charging batteries or, better still, using the fuel to generate the electricity, directly in internal combustion engines. This is not a new idea by any means and Musk is certainly not its 'Inventor', just Google "Stanley Meyer and his water-powered car" (circa 1998). If Musk claims to have innovated this idea, he is lying (as with several other projects).
If 1 in a Trillion stars have civilizations, then there are 10 BILLION alien civilizations. Anyone who asks, "Are we alone" has no understanding of this universe. It is mathematically impossible for us to be any where close to alone.
It certainly doesn't mean we are alone. For example, we now are openly discussing QUANTUM communication. If we develop that in the next 80 years - which honestly looks very likely - then we will have used radio - which is what we frantically look for, for under 200 years. A drop in the bucket of time. Not only would we have to be looking in the correct place for possible et life - BUT that group would have to be at precisely the correct stage of development to be using radio, rather than any other method of communicating. To put it bluntly, that is pretty unlikely, at best. What we find without direct observation is utterly meaningless.
What did you think you would get....REAL footage? Do you also think nasa's moon landings were real? Go to Apollo Detectives for many videos proving the hoaxes, as if well over half a century of no one going beyond low earth orbit since isn't enough of a clue...
Betelgeuse has already gone super nova. It is just that it is over 700 light years from Earth and we have yet to see the explosion..... And we may not see it in our lifetimes.....
The Penrose diagram is a graph depicting all aspects of one thing, but for some reason really smart people forget when discussing black holes that it's not literally a hole, and in fact is a tremendous mass making it the polar opposite. Therefore the black hole IS the white hole, and this universe IS the alternate polarity universe all at once. Thus literally EVERYTHING that is "sucked into a black hole" is also ejected as particle radiation.
The Penrose diagram is a graph depicting all aspects of one thing, but for some reason really smart people forget when discussing black holes that it's not literally a hole, and in fact is a tremendous mass making it the polar opposite. Therefore the black hole IS the white hole, and this universe IS the alternate polarity universe all at once. Thus literally EVERYTHING that is "sucked into a black hole" is also ejected as particle radiation.
The jets come out of the accretion disk before the event horizon - also the poles are turning at 28,000 rpm while the equator spins at miles per second - mps - depending on the size
One thing I have never understood is this. If gravity isn’t a force but rather the bending of space time, then why do things even bend space time at all? Something has to be pulling everything down in order to create the bend in space time at all. If there wasn’t some force then all heavy things would just float over the top of space time and not create the gravitational waves or the bending at all. Even if something does create a dip in space time what causes things to fall into it? Why does it even make a dip to begin with if it’s not being pulled down by a force?
