Egypt and Syria Lanch a surprise "Attack".........lol.....Sinai, the Egyptian land occupied land back then by IOF...Egypt...when it launched a defensive operation, is labeled as an "Attack"...........no wonder the entire world right now saw how you lost the narrative......oh well....enjoy your "game" game I take a swim in amazing Sinai beaches. ❤️
Sorry, but please let us leave politics out of here. Initiating military action, whether you seem that it is rightful or not, is called an attack. The one who takes the first shot, or makes the first push, is the attacker, and the one who fires back, is the defender. Who is, from your point of view, right, is not relevant from a military POV. Egypt and Syria attacked Israel on Yom Kippur - from their POV to take back lands that were previously theirs. But it was still an attack. It's what you call that kind of military action. It is however not an indicator about the political motivation or the moral highground of either the attacker, or the defender. Please read the disclaimer. Enjoy your swim! <3
Its hard not to politicize this regarding the timing of current events (even if its historical) and the fact that it even needs a disclaimer to justify it when all other campaigns didn’t have one. You guys are literally the best aircraft simulation developers in my eyes and you just had to go on and politicize your product for the occupying forces.
Don't make it political then. They aren't. You all are. The disclaimer is because of now deleted comments making this trailer into something it never was.
@HeatblurSimulations please please pleaaaaaase add the G breathing effects to the F4 from @ReflectedSimulations campaign "MIG killers". its sooo good and makes flying as a whole and especially AFM much more immersive. (ground procedures/ checklists voiced by Jester 2.0 would also be cool 😬 just sayin 🙃) looking forward to the campaign! thy Greetings K
These trailers are always amazing. The music and scene setups are top notch. That said, DCS really needs to up their game in terms of fire and explosion effects. They are just... not great.
What is the price this time? Another 39 Eur for few predefined missions? No thanks I rather stay with 20 years old Falcon 4 Allied Force with even better flight model and dynamic campaign.
No, not really. They had some minor differences, but the base of a Kurnass was an -E indeed. The biggest difference was the probe-chute system for aerial refueling, and eventually the ability to employ the standarm. We may expand and add specific Kurnass features later on, but no promise for now.
@@104thironmike4 Here's what I read in one of the articles: What made Israel’s version of this plane so special was the special modifications installed to meet the specific needs of the IAF. The Israeli F-4s were equipped with advanced avionics, including a more sophisticated radar system, and they carried a variety of Israeli-made weapons. The IAF’s Phantom variants were fitted with electronic warfare systems, enhancing their survivability in hostile environments. Maybe this only applied to certain modifications.
@@Skipper441 This reads like the Kurnass 2000, which was an upgrade that came later, after Yom Kippur. In the original Kurnass (without the "2000" designation), to my best knowledge radar and avionics were the same. Even the probe-chute AAR system came only after the Yom Kippur War.
Ahhhh shit. Alright I'll finally set time aside to learn this beast now. Shes been sitting in the hanger getting dusty but enough content is coming its time to get at the controls.
