Now that you have connected the caps or load in parallel with coil output, does the joule theif still draw more current from source to compensate for the losses incurred in voltage boost up process?
i think u went into my head and stole my idea. i am planning to build exactly the same with just one change, instead peltier module, I'd conmect a small photovoltaic (solar panel) and amplify the voltage to 100 to 200 times. And just like you, I'll also connect the load in parallel to the coil so it wont draw extra current from the source. btw u earned a new subscriber today! thanks for posting such an esoteric knowledge for educating inventors.
😮thank you for an excellent presentation,,,I'm going to apply what I have learned today and try to develop a full scale boat, a shallow draft narrow beam flat bottom boat or a small pontoon paddle boat. Very well done👍👌🖖❤❤❤❤❤
I am still working on it, but the key is that the initial pressure distribution looks very different from the fully developed distribution. It will be the topic for the next video.
I am impressed, but am now wondering how a powdered & flaked bismuth would respond in water, being subjected to a stationary magnetic field & a rotating magnetic field. 😮
This channel is such a hidden gem. There are so many BS videos out there when it comes to magnets. As soon as I saw your DIY Liquid Graphite that Let's you see the Flow behavior.. Turbulent flow, lamaner flow, vortex's, etc. It really was a genius design and I really hope we see a lot more of any future experiments that you end up doing.
Current carriers are in the fluid itself which is moving orthogonal to the electric field... So presumably lorentz force applied is going to end up being rotated (about B axis)at some angle relative to the avg flow direction resulting in something roughly like a cos(k*v) relative efficiency. Anyways just a hypothesis
The rule of rotation seems to be on everything that is. Everything that is, is rotating on some level. Rotation is well known in Atoms. There is a secret woven into rotation and I think we are on the cusp of discovering it. :O)
You can make very small metalic particles to test with using sodium chloride brine electrolysis. The nacient reaction is removing materials, supposedly one ion reaction at a time. I don't have a microscope to measure particle size but they seep through a 5 micron filter media. You can do this with any metal that reacts with chlorine, but the chlorine is not released, but rather snatched back by the sodium ion it was 'borrowed' from. Leaving the metalic substance free to settle out of the brine electrolyte. You could play with the diamagnetic properties of copper, gold, and other such metals.
I got a bag of 1kg graphite powder from pinetown, it is the finest powder I have ever played with and it got into everything. I have lasers, ultrasonic humidifier and loads of magnets...next time I am brave enough to open that bag of graphite I will do some playing around
...just be very carfull, to not inhale it, be sure to use a particle mask.. ..stone dust lung isent a very pleasnt way to win the darwin award... please look up 'the-dangers-of-stone-dust' (applies to fine dust of most materials) can not post a link here... and be carfull..
Yes please share when you test it. Since graphite powder is very close to pure graphite (it may contain fractions of a percent of other minerals) we'll be able to compare the behavior of your powder with the one on the video and with pencil leads that are actually a baked clay/graphite composite that have a much higher percentage of "unknowns" in its composition. Looking forward to your results... 👍
It is a pity that the end of the magnetic assembly with a levitating graphite rod is in the shadow, which does not allow you to see what magnets it is assembled from. There is also an open question regarding the orientation of their poles.
The "pencil leads" aren't the same, one is 2b the other b. The five most common grades of hardness in pencil lead: 2B, B, HB, H and 2H and they run in that order, with 2B being the darkest imprint, HB being the middle of the road (used in just about every school in the world) and 2H giving you the lightest imprint of the five grades. A European grading system has been developed. The European system combines letters and numbers to represent each grade. This starts from the lightest H grades containing higher clay content, all the way to F, HB, and the darkest B shades. The difference in hardness (line weight and color) is a function the chemistry used to get desired hardness or softness, that's the source of the one being attracted vs the other not.
Yes the softer leads apparently have a higher ratio of graphite to binder. I thought it might levitate higher but could not see any obvious difference. Aside from one other make of lead (Pentel) all others were noticeably more magnetic and did not levitate at all.
@@justtinkering6713 good question. I assume it is there, just too faint to see. The larger coil used at the end of the video makes a tiny blue spark at higher voltages.
Great video again, thank you 😀, I was wondering if your ultrasound with soap method could be used as part of a process to 'purify' your graphene powder, if you were to hold a magnet next to the container attracting the particles (post ultrasound) that will to the magnet and then emptying the container 🤔
@@merkabaenergy9558 I haven't tried it post-ultrasound but otherwise it works just fine. If the container wall is thin enough the magnetic flakes will clump together over the magnet and you can slowly "drag" them away.
putting to shame most academic labs dealing with magnetism - sure, it's crude and lacks solid theoretical backing but it's exploratory and far beyond what is taught to the public
Back to square one...Yes, Very Interesting and now I'm curious, how did you arrange the magnets for the levitating graphite pencil leads? Great illustrations and explanations, Thanks!
Each "V" pair of large magnets has opposite poles facing each other, every second pair is reversed. This creates a strong horizontal field at the bottom of the V. The small magnets helps to strengthen the field but they are not essential.
@@williamfraser Thanks, sounds logical now you say it. I presume you have glued the magnets in place, so they don't snap together. I wonder if there is a difference in performance if the pencil lead is cut to various lengths - a full lead seems to center itself on 4 sets of magnets, and when you pushed it - it seemed to me like it wanted to settle at a particular location as the field lines 'go up and down' in a zig-zag pattern (if I understand right). Also, have you tried with other diameter leads? An easy experimental setup, should be fun and interesting to replicate and play around with myself to learn more about the various forms of magnetism. Thanks for caring and sharing!
The steel angle holds the magnets in place, no glue necessary. The alternating polarities give a horizontal field, alternating between pointing left and right. The strength of the field drops off rapidly in the vertical direction. The alternating polarities provide stability along the channel for certain lead lengths. You get good stability for lengths of roughly 1.5-1.8 times the magnet width, and again at 2.5, 3.5 times width etc. Thinner leads levitate higher but the attractive force when floating thin leads on water is weak and tedious to try and demonstrate.
Look for tutorials on basic electronics, then learn about more specific components and how they are used in various applications. Get a breadboard and a variety of components and just start building and experimenting.
I would imagine so. Thin wire, higher resistance, less energy dumped every time the transistor switches on. But there could be all kinds of secondary effects to complicate things.
Making an MHD dynamo is simple but prohibited (hidden). For this, you must make the liquid you use rotate in a vortex shape. Then, when you charge it with high voltage, you get a very high electric current. The output is in the mega watt range. It charges completely from gravity. If you want details, I can help you.
I’d like to these with rotating magnetic fields of different configurations. Also could you make make a rig to visualize the eddy currents from toroidal propellers?
