I got fed up of the dreadful wobble so stripped it - put all the electronics into a Chimera 7" V2 frame and it flew beautifully straight away. The SpeedyBee 8 Fold frame is rubbish I'm afraid.
I never managed to stop the jitters or jello - spent hours on it and gave up. Stripped it down and put all the parts into a new Chimera V2 7" Quad - much better straight away.
@@captainfpv6775 Can you confirm if you installed motors, propellers, stacks on a Chimera 7 Pro v2 frame? I was thinking of doing that, but I had doubts about the motors and propellers.
I think your the only other person who made a bugs 3 a acro monster besides me!!! I can't see why other people haven't done it. Bugs was the first quad I fell in love with but as I progressed with the hobby and started flying 6s I just couldn't go back to 2s. So I stuck the speedybee f7 v3 in it with some 2207 1800kv iflight motors and I tried many different props. The best results for me was 7inch props. It looks bone stock (kinda) but it definitely isnt... oh yeah I put gps on it also
I was looking for this information. The frame looks good but I had this question: will I sucess tune it ? I dont want to spend a lot of time in this process. I think I will got to Moz7 ! Thanks !
I never managed to stop the jitters or jello - spent hours on it and gave up. Stripped it down and put all the parts into a new Chimera V2 7" Quad - much better straight away. I also have the MOZ 7 - thats a way better quad than the clunky Mario 8. Even SpeeedyBee didn't release a tune for it - because it looks great - but is absolutely rubbish.
@@captainfpv6775 And between Moz7 and Chimera 7 witch you prefer ? I think Moz7 have more room inside. I also see AOS UL8 as an option. This 7- 8 inch will be a future project, nowadays flying an Pavo 20 pro and having a lot of fun.
Nice video. Pretty much what I expected to see for the speeds. I think the single biggest reason obviously apart from the speed, zero buffering when most of the family is using the net, that was the decision maker for me. Thanks for the video buddy.
It works out about the same, but I think the fibre is actually cheaper. I cant remember the exact cists from before. With Plusnet I was also paying for a landline, but now my home phone - using the same number is with an IP phone company and costs £3.60 a month. My calls using the IP landline setup has cost me less than £10 in a year - total.
@@captainfpv6775 Hi thank you for your answer. I am interested in your comment RE- IP landline less than £10 pa What is this are you saying that you can subscribe to a "landline" separately,and if so can you retain your existing number? For more information?
@@allansutcliffe648 I ported my landline number to 'VOIPFONE' in the UK. VERY HELPFUL. I chose to pay £2 per month for the porting and them hosting the number - or I could have paid about £20 ish and paid in one go. The actual cost of the service to have the IP fone service from them is £1.60 a month ! PLUS the £2.00 I explain above. I chose the PAYG option because we hatdly use the home phone - but my missus simply had to keep it............. Anyway - I put a tenner on the account for calls a year ago and still have £5.64 left - there's no time limit to use it. Oh, just remembered - you can save the £2 a month if you like and just use a free number they allocate you - but you would lose your current home number. Hope that helps.
It was my first ever FPV quad that I still love. It's the 6s Skystars Starlord 228. Originally an analogue quad, but now has a polar vista in it - I mainly use it for sunset shots. It's a metal frame - not carbon and is sprayed gold. There's a GoPro Hero 9 black on it - that annoys the hell out of me. I also took 3 other 03 quads and the DJI FPV. But this one is a dream to fly.
Bloody hell, thats not great! I mean why anyone would want to dupe a firm out of props thare pennies when considering other components of the hobby are far more expensive. I hope you get a resolution as do Unmanned Tech as this is not good for either party moving forward.
I've never had the need to complain about anything from Unmanned tech before let alone some props. These are carbon props as well, so quality control has missed these I guess. A tenner for 4 props isn't a huge amount - but its a tenner in the bin for these.
You can’t blame the internal infrastructure. Besides you get more concurrent speeds and who needs to go that fast (gbit) on a phone. When all else fails go wired.
What do you mean you can't blame the internal Infrastructure ? Do you mean brick walls don't make a difference to a WiFi signal? or do you mean the different internal protocols of any piece of wifi enabled receiver such as a phone or tablet makes no difference?
@@captainfpv6775 Obstacles aside (every building is made differently). There are so many flavors of WiFi now up to WiFi 7 (6e just brought in the 6GHz band). You can't fully compare your old VDSL line with a 900mbps connection if you just rely on the provided router and Wi-Fi to compare it (They are rarely good). Best you could do is have multiple access points at all corners of the house (WiFi 6, 6e, 7) and connected back over a 1 gbit back-haul wired connection (even then 1gbit is old hat now, 2.5gbit and 10gbit are wired Ethernet are becoming more available now). Just think, you can actually saturate a 1gbit wired connection with just the Internet alone (not including anything else!). This aside the point is, where a 900mbps connection comes into its own is less contention with the people using the same connection (assuming you are not on all one pale WiFi access point and in a heavy contested Wi-fi location). If you want the full speed, get 6GHz (WiFi 6e) running on a 320MHz bandwidth and a modern phone and you will easy see over 1gbps over WiFi (distance depending) or go wired (mobiles aside) or a mix of both.
