I have an upcoming interview for an Transaction Service internship and your Video helped me prepare for the possible Question what the buy side. Thank you very much
It would be interesting to see you make an Office theme with the color theme and fonts of the Economist. It allows you to save soooo much time and ensures consistency between different graphs that have the same style. If people only know how to change the graph manually and edit every one of the graph’s properties one by one, they won’t do it; they will just use the built-in themes because they save them so much time TL;DR I would love to see a video of you making an Economist Office theme 😄
any beginner book recommendations? looking to learn more about the field literally dont know much. I am looking to understand the framework of what technical skills I am missing, what technical skills are needed for the job and then a breakdown of those technical skills. If you have any order of books for beginners and then books that get progressively more technical or insight any information would be appreciated
Defs don't need a book - just have a look at some RU-vid channels that really break things down. @KenjiExplains has some great Investment Banking explained videos!
Thanks for sharing a list of reading materials you have provided that will help people seeking a career in Finance, Investment Banking, Equity Analysis, Commodities, etc. Thank you.
Hi Luke, Crisp & meaningful gist on the process that people, who are interested in M&A deals, should know. I completed my first M&A deal (Sell Side) for my company & it was exactly the same steps you have mentioned in this video. While I was listening to you, I was reliving those moments of long hours spend on preparing Information Memorandum, NDAs, Management Presentation decks, Bids, Negotiation, etc. Pls make more videos on LBOs, PE, Valuation Methods adopted by Investment Bankers, Legal aspects on Non Compete clause, etc. Really a great video, thanks for sharing... respect from India🙏
Thank you for the video, would appreciate a more in depth explanation of the each part of the process. Coming to this from a lawyer perspective so uts interesting to know what an investment banker has to say about it
You worked in PE? Would you explain to me why the PE industry is a thing? LP’s get no better returns than from Index Funds in the long term, meanwhile PE Firms are laying workers off, cutting pay & benefits to the bone, raising pricing on consumers, shuttering while divisions, liquidating assets, and sending jobs overseas. Seems like a whole lot of destruction and harm to society for returns no better than the S&P. Investing in Indices would have done the same for LP’s without hurting anyone.
Thank you for the content Luke! On a startup journey of my own, so I definitely resonate with this + appreciate & admire your leap! Praying for all the best with you & your business! God bless 🙌🏿💯
Academically correct. In practice, however, his marketplace theories tend to dismiss social responsibility to the exclusion of shareholder profits. Very bright man, but like many economists, he believed too strongly in the invisible hand as a panacea for financial as well as social ills...probably hubris.
Thank you very much for the "core" of Excel and its powerful functions, we will try far from the Economist We respect you and "everyone who struggles to do good"... the programmer, the teacher, the soldier, the worker and the farmer. As for the Economist, who cares about the fraud (most of them) and his style? Indeed, in the days of sick globalization, many of them had a bad reputation (except for a few) in igniting high prices, underestimating the value of workers, and whistling the tables of the poor in order to flirt with greedy monsters. There is a lot of fraud on morals, so I do not see their relationship with style?
Thank you. I've been trying to figure out how to format the axit to just show the year on a chart for the longest time. You have just made my life so much better.
@@carlhartwell7978because it has nothing to do with what was said. That's what a straw man argument is. Does capitalism reward virtue? Or does it reward manipulation of the system? Pointing to communism and saying "oh they didn't get it right either" is just a deflection, because he _knows_ that capitalism rewards manipulation of the system, not virtue.
@@tomweather8887 More to the point, I'd say any system can be manipulated. Capitalism tends towards rewarding virtue and can be manipulated without regulation, communism tends towards rewarding manipulation and can be virtuous, with regulation. Call me too individualistic, but I prefer the system which allows me to be me, unless I'm doing something wrong, than the system which tells me what I can do, and mandates what I must do. But then I'm neither a communist or a nazi 🤔
@@carlhartwell7978 based on what? C'mon dude. That just makes me think you don't know how to read. So your answer to the question is yes? Capitalism does indeed reward manipulation of the system? I don't care what you think communism does or doesn't do, it's irrelevant to the question.
@@tomweather8887 I very much doubt Friedman would have ever outright said 'no capitalist has ever manipulated the system'. I'll accept that out of context it _seems_ to be a strawman argument. But clearly witin the context of the debate Friedman is having a discussion about capitalism vs communism. He's clearly arguing that (in so far as no system is perfect) capitalism is better.
how would you relate the case of the onion king to a perfectly competitive market structure based on the characteristics? and would you say it resembles a different kind of market structure based on its characteristics? and Lastly, what failures do you see in the market in this case?
