I'm being investigated for a forgery I did not write. My identity was stolen and used by someone to obtain medication with a fake prescription. They want to analyse my writing and compare it to the forged script. Obviously, they won't match. But is this like Lie Detector tests that arent admisable in court, yet can still f*ck up your defence? They already have my laptops, searched my house and have my alibies. Yet theyre STILL lookimg at me despite zero evidence. All my colleagues, friends and family have told police I'm upstanding & honest professional. Yet here I am, now being asked for a handwriting sample. Should I refuse? Where do I literally draw the line?
Josh Lucas as Mitch McDeere is a good Choice, Molly Parker as Abby McDeere is pretty lame, Cullum Rennie as Ray McDeere is a great choice, but the absolute worst choice was Juliette Lewis as the sexy, saucy secretary. Who chose her, terrible actress and nothing even close to the original character, very off putting!
always thought this technique was AWESOME! its a Good way to catch scumbags like the ones in the old crime shows in use to watch. i was heavily into crime stopping shows!
And what if something was not written by human hands? in the age of deepfakes and household cutting/plotting machines anyone with a bit of knowledge could create the perfect forgery and frame someone.
We found a threatening note written on a wall....... we suspect one person and I need to compare the handwriting without telling the suspect anything,wish me luck,never done this before
A handwriting expert is about as reliable as an opinion. I had a handwriting expert try and say my father's signature on a will he signed for us was a fraud until I was able to retrieve old documents with his signature that was able to match the one on the will. My father's signature changed daily. Their opinion should be taken with a grain of salt.
@@bonobobby There is reasons why a lie detector test cannot be used as evidence in court. Sure it is a tool that can use to help with an investigation ,but it is not 100% accurate. So why is it that a so-called handwriting expert's opinion can be used in court when in fact they are not 100% accurate either? Shouldn't those same principles apply? Now in the case of artificial AI I suppose that they are using this technology to help in identifying handwriting signatures nowadays ,but the opinion of a human being is not reliable enough to be used with so much weight behind it.
