In the total I think uk and Canada will win What you should add is how advanced the millitarys are like india has alot of planes but they are old russian planes but with the uk and Canada they are hight quality f35's and eurofighter typhoon's don't get me wrong india has some good planes but most are old russian planes This is a key factor because its all about missles and bombs not how many there are
Idiote India has Rafales Sukhoi 30 Tejas Mirages Mig 29 Etc Helicopters Apaches Lch parchand Dhruv Etc. Nuclear weapons 2 aircraft carriers And above all 5.5 million strong standing army
Shaheen 3 ballist nuclear missile range is 300 thousand kilometer india and israil both in range who ever shake is ass will be fucked Pakistan holding Search in you tube ....the amazing shot how abenandan fall from plane
India is enough for all 3 countries, but India will not support Israel against Iran, and Iran also won't support pakistan against india . So it's a baseless comparison.
@@FaisalKhan-nx2jr Did you remember F16 Shot down by abhinandan ? , 93K soldier surrender in 1971 ? Kargil war ? 1965 ? Pak army be like- jang kabhi jiti nahi aur election kabhi harya nahi๐คฃ๐คฃ
Yes, but like Israel, Iran is also friend of india. Now because of sanctions, it doesn't seem like that , but still India didn't cared about US sanctions and Iran didn't cared about Chinese pressure. So even without trading, India and Iran have very close relationship So at no point Iran and India will be at war with each other
This comparison video is terrible. How does NATO have 851k active personnel when the US alone has over 1.2 million? NATO has 3.5 million active military altogether. Likewise, you listed NATO as having only 649k reserve personnel when again, the US ALONE has over 766k. NATO altogether has 3.4 million reserve personnel. Total airpower listed for NATO was 5,253. Again. US alone fields over 13,300 military aircraft. NATO as a whole has 22,308. In terms of fighter aircraft, you listed NATO as having a mere 881. The US fields roughly 3,400 fighter aircraft. In terms of dedicated attack aircraft, you listed NATO as having 277. The US has 896. 381 transport aircraft for NATO when the US has more than 4,000. Special mission aircraft you listed 244 when the US has 695. 3184 NATO tanks? How when the US has about 4,657 main battle tanks on its own. NATO has 12,408 total. 687 naval assets? NATO has 1,392 naval assets. MOST LAUGHABLE is how you claim NATO only has 4 aircraft carriers when the US alone has 11 aircraft carriers and 9 helo carriers (seriously, you claim NATO only has 3 helo carriers lol). NATO as a whole fields 16 major aircraft carriers total (not including helo), compared to China's 2. NATO has 112 destroyers, not 28. NATO has 135 frigates, not 34. NATO has 55 corvettes, not 16. NATO has 139 submarines, not 37. And finally... NATO's "combined budget" is not 235.5 billion USD, that is less than the US alone. It is 1.26 trillion USD. I'm not sure if this is just pure ignorance or Chinese propaganda but I'm willing to say it's likely the latter based on the Chinese estimates being fairly accurate while the NATO figures are complete hogwash.
Turkey takes the top spot because it has very powerful friends to back them up military and saudi arabia has important resources most other nations need and egypt is in a strategic position when it comes to trade routes........ as for iran, who cares ๐
Turkey is part of NATO so of course it has the top spot since it's alliance will back it up. then comes Saudi Arabia as Saudi Arabia can easily gather up all the Islamic groups to fight with her since it's the Muslim holy land where Kaaba belongs. Also it can control the oil prices and create a mess then comes Egypt which has a very strong ties with all the Arabic countries so a war with Egypt means a war with all the Arabic Countries (note that a war with Saudi Arabia doesn't guarantee a war with all the Arabic countries). Also given that Egypt is the strongest army in the Arab world, they know that if Egypt falls, they will fall next easily. So far Egypt has the strongest military among this list and also has the most diverse army (the weapons are coming from many sources and it has a huge production of arms and a huge number of infantry) Iran has a very tough demography and also can gather up most of the Islamic fighters around such as Huthis, Hezboallah etc which can disturb the world completely. In short, these 4 countries are really hard to go to war against
The german army personal stats of 62k just includes fighing forces like infantry and armored units. Medical, logistic, mechanic etc are not includet in the number
You cannot compare Ukraine to any of the other fighting forces. The Ukrainian army has been rebuild from the ground up. And a tank is not the same as a tank. I mean the entire Ukrainian army has been rebuild with draftees with zero combat experience. Probably 15% or less is experienced. The rest are all newbees of whom only 5% is really willing to fight. The tanks provided are not that great and the ones that are actually decent are destroyed in a rapid pace. So the Ukraine is absolutely not able to cope with any of the armies it is compared with.
yeah we haven t seen these mighty forces that we can t compare to Ukraine, fight yet in a real war .. only thing we saw is the bombing of peasants with aks and civilians occasionaly get a French troop for 1 week on a trench in -15 temp he will be begging his mama to save him and give him a croissant Its funny how couch generals in the west think that war is Call of duty
ukrains militairy power is supplied by france, UK and germany, and lets not forget the rest of the EU and the USA. so to say ukraine has militairy power and than compair it to the people who give it money is absurd!. ukraine also lost around 600.000 soldiers, and would have lost the war years ago if it was not for the EU and USA funding and supplying it with weapons, the real super power here is MONEY from the EU, UK and the US
