The fact is that it shows less weight before the suspending string was broken. It doesn't matter how much you have fabricated a story, it doesn't explain why the initial weight was less.
Are you sure it's not the nitrogen that stays low to the ground that interacts with the magnet more importantly than the material superconductor. It might acknowledge other minerals it gases in the superconductor. Have you attempted to pour nitrogen on the magnetic field? Or eliminating particles in the superconductors to find the true chemical reactions making it weightless? Also weightless isn't the truth and weight on them becomes a significant factor.
Your experiment did not replicate what happened in the clip you showed. There are a few discrepancies. First is the lift - he didn't lift it straight up, the spinning wheel was lifted at an angle. Second - he didn't make multiple revolutions. It went around his head not even a full circle. Third - after going from roughly shoulder to shoulder the wheel was again dropped at a steep angle. Fourth - you suspended the gyro from a string which never happened in the clip you showed. Unless the gyro is attached to a replica of the arm your test results are also incomplete. As for the results, you look at a straight line as if its your answer, but in fact the sensors continue to jump around giving higher and lower information which raises interesting questions about why a straight line is used instead of looking at the specifics of when and why something happened in a set time frame. If you replicate the angle of lift, the half circle motion used around his head, the angle of descent AND have the equivalent of a arm used, your experiment would be much more accurate. And if you take into account the actual sensor readings instead of assuming a straight line, you will also get different information from your own results. AND the type of sensor you use will have a massive impact on the results. But even if you attach all the sensors you want, it still doesn't change that a man who was struggling to hold the weight with two hands, and you can see the scale shaking, could later move it with one hand.
Show an example of true levitation something thousands of feet above Earth without propellers or wings that can turn on a dime accelerate beyond belief because of a Focused Field in front of it that you're falling to constantly can make 90° turns because you're being pulled in a falling motion so you never experienced G-Force
I'd love to see a simple circle with a slight tilt in favor of g-force, inside of a vacuum chamber. With no friction or air resistance, I'd like to see how long it could spin (assuming you can push start both times with the same amount of force) compared to outside the vacuum chamber.
Make a paper mobius strip and cut it along its length; 1 cut: double mobius strip 2 cuts: mobius strip inside mobius strip 3 cuts: double mobius strip inside mobius strip
im no scientist but this feels like a gimmick and i highly doubt it will ever be fully utilised or developed and its certainly never going to be commercially used. cool video though
Sounds like a bit of a dumbed down description Its called quantum locking Bit yeah cold temperatures sound like a bummer They got a new room temp semi conductor Witch lead me to run onto this Right wouldnt it make a great (Hot wheel match box car race right....) DonsXDragons Mc Anarcho communism is the party of enlightenment🔥📺🐉
The area where you cut it and twist it around, this means it takes you from one side to the other, and when you get around the other side back to this twist from the opposite side it will being you also back to the original side you were on, so it basically just repeats that infinitely.
Ok now think of it on bigger scale for infinitely magnetic quantum locking energy for homes and company free energy by hooking cooper coils to the circles of the loop and adding soiler tiles for double the time..
