Jerry's movie analysis channel. I also started taking acting lessons in 2024, so I will look at movies from both a behind the camera and in front of the camera lens. We will watch movies, think about artistic decisions, examine acting techniques, and explore all aspects of the artist experience. Hope you enjoy this channel. Subscribe if you're an aspiring actor, Hollywood person, or just a hobbyist or lover of great cinema. I will bring on lots of guests too.
Also, I'm a huge fan of the Three Stooges, so I will probably do a lot more Three Stooges analysis on this channel. We will take an in depth look at them and a lot of the episodes. Enjoy! Nyuk nyuk nyuk nyuk.
My favorite director is Stanley Kubrick, so we'll have some Kubrick analyses too on this channel.
I just realized I never added time codes. I will add them now. Also, I just got to look more at the Stanley Kubrick archives. Part two here (looking at how the futuristic Mecha's were designed): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aeBXRH1oWrE.html
Stanley Kubrick developed the concept for the movie and worked on it for years before his passing, first and last acts of the movie, which reflect a more human and emotional tone, were indeed influenced by Kubrick's vision therefore were ultimately shaped and directed by Steven Spielberg who naturally brought his own sensibilities to the film, especially in the portrayal of emotions and relationships. The middle act, which involves more of the darker, dystopian themes, aligns more closely with Kubrick's style. That combination of these two directors' influences gives the film its unique blend of starkness and sentimentality. That being said, the first and last acts were part of Kubrick’s original concept, the “aliens” y’all hated were part of Kubrick’s vision, the reunion between the mother and the child was Kubrick’s concept Tbh i can understand the confusion and dislike the movie generates but only if it’s your first time, if the second time you haven’t change your perspective then i guess you’re not putting the proper attention, It’s frustrating how this movie often faces criticism due to the Spielberg-Kubrick comparison, when the film itself presents such a deep and sophisticated exploration of human nature and technology. The emphasis on their differing styles can detract from the film’s rich, thought-provoking concept
I love the film, I’ve watched it (by accident) enough times to know every scene and effects. Sadly it’s a mismatch of Spielberg trying to imitate Kubrick’s cold harsh realism and 3rd person view of people and emotions and Spielberg’s urge to place his sentimental build ups to to tug at the audience emotions and leave them with an ex static teary moment (which in our current times no longer is very effective, people seem to have become jaded and see his emotional manipulation for what it is and see it before it hits). As I said, I do love the film, I found the integration of technology in the future very believable but after seeing it recently I still want the kitchen in the house but the technology of lighting let it down quite severely. We have sky projected holograms in Rouge City yet the house, cars and the Flesh Fair use simple fluorescent tubes or traditional lighting fixtures, this is especially noticeable with the bright lights on the bed canopy. Given the jumbo screen at the Flesh Fair was a tri-led display they missed a trick with lighting which now is one of the main things that age the film. The proposed Kubrick ending would have been more satisfying but would have left more question about Monica’s future and reality of loosing the real people in her family. Remember, she is not a construct of David’s memory, she is living through a thread imprinted in time, it’s limit of a day seems arbitrary and she could have lived for several days to months before fading away. Another opuntia on your interpretation of the ending, I don’t recall them saying David never wakes up, I just remember him sleeping, dreaming and being satisfied for the first time. The film ultimately did have too many loose ends that needed to be tied up, other more advanced robots would have been found, their memory chips read and recreated. More of the future that Spielberg is certainly aware of could have been shown. The Flesh Fair was full of disgruntled people so more societal narrative could have been added. Monica’s family were clearly part of the 1% and they could have been placed socially compared to the masses who have been replaced by robots and Ai, presumably living in poverty.
By the way, what kind of name is "Lefie" ?? Like, how do you even come up with such a name!??? Like, it's not even close to any other names, which have a similar kind of sounding name for it.😮😮😮 Lefie..?? 🧐🧐🤔🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯😤😤😤 Seriously Lefie?? I can't even put a name which is similar to it. Lefty?? "Hey, meet my son, Lefty. We named him Lefty, because we thought he looked like a Lefty. 🙃🙃😬😬🙂🙂" " How do you spell it?" " Lefie. The T is silent.🤫🤫😀😀" What was his parents thinking, where they disslexkick ? Or something?? 🤔🤔🧐🧐🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
I don't get why being compared to Cher was deemed to be an insult? And was it Cher, as in the music artist Cher? Notable songs being: Titanium. rockabye baby ft Sean Paul. Wild One ft Flo-Rida. Chandelier, Elastic Heart, Unstoppable, Greatest, Cheap Thrills. Alive. Big Girls Cry. ? Is that the Cher which Laila was being made in comparison to by Anne Robinson, when she was told: " you are the weakest link" ? Buy the way, Laila did have a good come back with that response remarks. When she said: " well she looks good for her age. Unlike some people!🥴😬😬🧐😝😝😘😘🤫🤫"
I did notice this in the end credits but something else...it seems to me that Sugimura waves to us, the audience, right before he goes off screen. Anyway, I always like to think that's what he was doing.
Comedian Freddy Lewis used to do a great Sammy Davis Jr. impression back in '82 at The Holy City Zoo. In fact, he used to sign autographs as Sammy Lewis Jr.
This wotld is too hypersensitive now. So called "comedy" isnt funny anymore because its all politicly correct hypersensitive garbage. Oldee comics like these are real gems!!
Of course, his was the best since he was about the same size, SM ALL small! No seriously he does Sammy the best that I've seen. Jim Carrey's wasn't bad. I don't know why they stuck Eddie in here lol.
I suggest you watch some videos by guys like Rob Ager to discover how underrated AI actually is. People forget, Kubrick had agreed to let speilberg direct before he died. Kubrick felt his dark tone would 'give the game away' more that Speilberg's candyfloss touch. There wouldn't have been an AI directed by Stanley had he lived. The movie would have been produced by Kubrick, but directed by Speilberg.
I doesn't matter how mean she comes of as when dude gave her them flowers she had to left to two corner's of her mouth to smile probably was even wet between the legs😂
@@trevormillar1576 Joeblo originals has a . I like the work that you did and I am surprised that you replied to my comment, because I totally forgot about making it, but I’m a lot like you with my channel in terms of if I get a comment that I haven’t seen for some reason I usually always try to reply to all my comments, even if it’s just a heart. Anyway, for all I know as a RU-vidr, it’ll work may have gotten even better, but if you don’t mind my saying, I think that you have a lot of talent in terms of your presentation and you do a great job with minimal material to create a narrative. Don’t give up this hobby. It’s a good thing for you to keep doing because I think you have talent. Thanks again for replying to my original comment and I wish you well.
@@trevormillar1576 somehow it got cut off but on the Joeblo originals channel is a half hour documentary about the making of AI and it does support exactly what you said. So I just wanted to make extra note of that.
From my perspective for the topics it delves into, A.I. is a timeless movie. Thanks for your perspective and for the unknown info about the end in the original Kubrick script... 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
I loved A.I. but only watch it once in a very long while because it makes me feel disjointed and melancholy, Kubrik's ending probably would have had me bawling my eyes out. Someone might tackle this again some day with Kubrik's intended ending.
Disagree. That was not Monica. It was a simulation (probably in David's neural network, not physically). So it wasn't true love. Because the real Monica never loved david. Only felt guilty about sending him to be destroyed. The question posed in the meeting room "can a human love a robot back?" the answer is no. The future mecca gave david his dream wish. Being a robot boy, he had the innocence to believe the "simulated charade". The robots probably terminated David after his "special day" to put an end to his near eternal suffering. The future Mecca are a hive mind. They collectively downloaded David's consciousness... All his memories, emotions and "soul". I can only imagine what they thought of their extinct creators after seeing the anguish and despair they caused david to endure for over 2000 years. The movie was maligned by many who didn't understand the existentialism. I'm not convinced that "Kubrick happy ending" was true. that would be WAY too sappy for him IMHO.
This is a very interesting interpretation of the film, I liked it quite a lot even though it's a really sad movie. Teddy and Joe were characters I felt bad for, they both deserved better. I do agree the Monica that David was with in the end, was not the same Monica she was just a clone likely in a simulation, as you were saying.
Well, too much of explaining from the guy seemed so repetitious and corny! Well, the thing to be understood is that Japan was at war with them and naturally they might have been inclined to make fun but they didn't! There's nothing noticeably negative and the guy seems like typical obsessed Americans who search for offences. They portrayed normally and respectfully unlike the short films containing Germans where they overtly made fun. These old movies are so superior! Old is gold.
