@MiloBoz He is agreeing with the concept and he even uses the same terminology of the mutakallimūn i.e hawadith fee zaatillah to express what he means. He justifies it by referring to imam bukhari رح statements and others. However ulema that spoke to them explained they misunderstood imam bukhari رح and others.
@@MohammadQasim what a mushrik. Would be good if its possible to add this clip to the other short. I listened to his debate with Bob the builder and in it it also appears he said the Qur'an thats recited or exists in the mind is created.
@MiloBoz Anything on earth or creation is created but an attribute of God isnt created. I woulf advise not to do takfir of him. Its best for ulema to do it. All we can do is advise/warn/ and highlight the kufr statement. Takfir on a complex matter should be avoided
@@MohammadQasim The Qur'an was revealed to humans on earth yet its uncreated because its not encompassed inside the earth. Whether its written or recited or in the minds of the believers - the Qur'an is always uncreated. I follow the early athariyyah only - not najdis or ibn taymiyyah who excused these jahmiyyah. So I have a clear precedent from the salaf for general takfir of such ppl.
Before i heard the clear kufr in other video I thought this was about the voluntary acts (Sifat Fi'liyya). Would me good if u can add that other clip to this short. For example Allah has the essential attribute of being The Creator and this is an essential/eternal Attribute (Sifat Dhatiyah) However His voluntary will and action of creating Adam (peace be upon him) occured at a specific time. That action is uncreated and not separare from His essence. But we cannot say the action is eternal because it manifested at a specific time. So it falls under the attributes of voluntary acts (Sifat Fi'liyya) and not Essential Attributes (Sifat Dhatiyya). The essential attributes are eternal and never change. The voluntary divine acts( Sifat Fi'liyya) Jay refers to as energies can occur any time. So christians themselves have no problem with this.
@MiloBoz Unfortunately these 2 individuals are prominent in the dawah scene and this ideology will trickle down to the laymen. If possible, warn against the people towards them two. JazakAllahu khair
Whatsoever is uncreated is eternal. Its a simple law. Whatsoever is uncreated is God also. If quran is the word of allah and is uncreated then both allah and his ARE UNCREATED. meaning there are two different beings in islam that are uncreated making Allah and Quran. Simple logic.
@@MohammadQasim my friend anything that is eternal has its own being. Whatever is an attribute of something can exist separate from that thing. Quran being Eternal means it has a being and a consciousness
@@MohammadQasim Omnipresence, omniscient and Omnipotence are all attributes of God, can you say these 3 attributes are eternal??? Imagine, omnipresence is eternal what does that even mean.
@@MohammadQasim ok, but question do you not like farid responds? Because he just said something that is true which is that IF all the scholars said music was halal it still wouldnt be because Muhammad PBUH said it isnt, theres a reason its hypothetical, hes not saying its possible for all the scholars to say that, therefore he isnt discrediting the hadith you out, but still hypothetically speaking we would still follow Muhammad PBUHs practice of staying away from it.
@AbdullahArguer Farid responds does good work and i used to even promote him however overtime he fell into attacking other muslim groups and even made elementary errors in fiqh and madhab topics. Hence i felt the need to call that out. (Paraphrase) so in regards to farid speaking about music. He said if all scholars agree on music he would go with the hadith instead i.e he implied scholarship is meaningless if theres a hadith present. Problem with this is manyfold. 1) hadith can be understood in many ways hence why we have 4 madhabs so when he says i will take the hadith over all scholars he is effectively saying i will take my understanding of hadith over all qualified scholars understanding i.e he isnt even a scholar to do such a thing. 2) he assumed agreement of scholars is meaningless if a hadith is present. However that goes against another hadith and the concept of ijma.
@AbdullahArguer note: he still does good work just be aware that he can make such mistakes where his education doesnt lie in. You can still watch his other content on refutation which is pretty good.
This day I have perfected your religion for you and completedMy favour upon you and have chosen Islam as religion for you (Surah Maidah ayat 3). it is clear that Allah (S.W.T) said here. that means nothing can be added or subtracted from the basic fundamentals of Islam. Then how can a messenger come after the deen is complete. Hazrat isa (A.S) will come at end times but not as a messenger but as ummat of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W).
Sorry, but you really can't say what this woman was thinking! She might have wanted to go into the shop, but saw the group. So it could have been the case of, Should I go in! Is the shop closed? Should I come back later? Maybe I should go somewhere else? Is that so-and-so's lad there!?
There is a difference between the need of taking and simply rejecting. You are just rejecting to take from them without any reason. I dont know any one who says that you have to take knowledge from them. Whats your reason to almost reject them ? And what does that mean "these 2 arent needed ?" Who speaks about scholars of salafiyyah like that ? Besides that, do you even know anything about those two ? Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab was the Mujaddid of his time, like major scholars after him stated. The amount of disrespect shown here is crazy. I wouldnt call you a deviant but a jahil who envies the scholars. And after taking a look into your channel, it seems like your a little Mohammad Hijab fanboy. Fanboying for a sufi ashari and rejecting Ibn Taymiyyah and Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab, thats why you are a deviant. You are really someone who takes knowledge from the most random juhhal there are on youtube like this self proclaimed atheist Mufti Layht who does Istihlal on a daily basis, and you yourself protecting shirk from the barelvis who call upon the prophet. You are neither salafi, nor knowledgeable.
Elizabeth and Mary are sister, and in Lukas 1:5 said that Elisabeth is decendant of Aaron.. so Mary is also decendant of Aaron.. AlQuran is clearly God miracle
It's actually crazy how stupid this video is. Where does jake say only salafis will enter jannah ? And you are holding him account to a statement he made while being a quranist, which he has repented from.
I understand Muslims are illiterate like Mohammed (Piss be upon him) so no point in really posting this answer to their question other than anyone else who stumbles upon their lies; 48 “But if the priest comes to examine it and the mold has not spread after the house has been plastered, he shall pronounce the house clean, because the defiling mold is gone. 49 To purify the house he is to take two birds and some cedar wood, scarlet yarn and hyssop. 50 He shall kill one of the birds over fresh water in a clay pot. 51 Then he is to take the cedar wood, the hyssop, the scarlet yarn and the live bird, dip them into the blood of the dead bird and the fresh water, and sprinkle the house seven times. 52 He shall purify the house with the bird’s blood, the fresh water, the live bird, the cedar wood, the hyssop and the scarlet yarn. 53 Then he is to release the live bird in the open fields outside the town. In this way he will make atonement for the house, and it will be clean
The Quran isn’t eternal because it’s a temporal particular and doesn’t subsist within God so it’s not eternal but the words that are contained within the Quran are uncreated becuz they’re the words of God
Women should Strictly refuse this, as alot if men abuse it, get a man into a marriage fully! Men are just not just or mature full stop. I actually it probably is haraam.
@@MohammadQasim between a misyar marriage and a Shia mutah marriage? Which ppl like hijab r so obsessed with. No difference for the poor women. only a ridiculous ecumenical difference from sectarians. In fact mutah might be better depending on the terms of misyar (such as those touted by these outrageous “no strings Nikah” exploiters) because in the Shia arrangement she gets better paid for it and can at least feed her children! No moral god would encourage either.
@dodgysmum8340 mutah is stipulated temporary. Misyar isnt stipulated and its longterm. Thats the difference. You talk about wealth provided, so does a misyar marriage dowry is given. In terms of divorce, the partner is at a liberty to leave the marriage as per god given right. Your objections mean nothing.
@@MohammadQasim to you they don’t, but pretty sure They do to the woman ! Makes zero difference IRL which form your believe your silly prophet stipulated if the man can leave with 3 talaks anyway! If you cant admit that you are disingenuous or truely indoctrinated. . As to money, like I said, mutah seems fairer to me for the very reason it’s a set service for a set price.
@@MohammadQasim yeah, thankfully your shariah law means nothing in the west either. Disgusting misogynist attitude with nothing to back it up except made up tafsir.
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best rows for men are the front rows and the worst are the back rows. The best rows for women are the back rows and the worst are the front rows.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 440 When this was the case for the masjid, where the people are the most well behaved, then how can any type of mixing be allowed outside?? ˹O Prophet!˺ Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their chastity. That is purer for them. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments1 except what normally appears.... Surah Noor ayah 30-31 Jarir reported: I asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, about the accidental glance. The Prophet said, “Redirect your sight.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 2148 Grade: Sahih When Allah and His Messenger SAW have commanded us to not even look, how can having conversations be okay?? this is evidence enough for those that are seeking the truth, and the evidences against free mixing are so many i can state them all day. Fear Allah brothers and sisters and don't let your desires get the better of you when the truth is clear.
This is why I quit calling myself a salafi. I dont ascribe to this new age sect According to them all you need to study are kitab al tawheed, usul al thalaatha, qawaid arbaa' and kashfassubuhaat and a few other tiny booklets and you're stamped with more knowledge than sahabah even as shamsi once said "the books of the aqaaidh weren't written then" when he was talking about the khuruj of imam Hussein What a joke
Great video akhi! I recommend you use a better method of taking clips so as to keep the quality good. Windows and Apple both have in-built screen recorders which do a good job for both audio and video!
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best rows for men are the front rows and the worst are the back rows. The best rows for women are the back rows and the worst are the front rows.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 440 When this was the case for the masjid, where the people are the most well behaved, then how can any type of mixing be allowed outside?? ˹O Prophet!˺ Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their chastity. That is purer for them. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments1 except what normally appears.... Surah Noor ayah 30-31 Jarir reported: I asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, about the accidental glance. The Prophet said, “Redirect your sight.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 2148 Grade: Sahih When Allah and His Messenger SAW have commanded us to not even look, how can having conversations be okay?? this is evidence enough for those that are seeking the truth, and the evidences against free mixing are so many i can state them all day. Fear Allah brothers and sisters and don't let your desires get the better of you when the truth is clear.
The questions Imam Malik was asked were not common typical questions that would be easy to answer, they were difficult complex questions, not related to easy matters which Shamsi may be used to answering
Jake’s love for the peripatetic axiom is stupid. He’s seriously so ignorant on philosophy that he holds to old axioms and paradigms refuted 200 years ago. He is by far the Muslim opponent jay has met that comes up with the most circular, arbitrary and generally fallacious statements.
Jake must stop condemning the ummah's greatest and largest community , the AshAri Ahlis Sunnah wal Jamaa ah. Most of the libraries of the Muslim world were filled with Books in all fields and subjects for the last 1200 years. This is an undeniable fact. Your assessments and critical statements are extremely weak and stupid. Your continued reference to ibn Taymiyyah is ridiculous and unscholarly. Your present statements are not based on real understanding and deep research.
