Our channel is currently "under construction" as we develop new programs! But you can always check out our past presentations, living history portrayals, and more that remain on the channel in our "Archive" section.
The mission of the Northeast Georgia History Center at Brenau University is to preserve and share the history of Northeast Georgia. Our exhibits, historic structures, educational programming, and events connect people to the past so that they may better understand the present.
We offer Digital Memberships! Please visit our website for more information: www.negahc.org/member
My ancestors fought for the CSA(from GA) and I have read some of the historical letters that were sent home to their families. They complained about dysentery, being VERY COLD(needing wool socks), and...wishing for a fresh piece of fruit(like an apple or a peach). One of them died in camp...of measles. It was a miserable time!
Great lecture and thank you for presenting this one not many people know about Spain's contribution the American revolution. What were the resources used for this presentation?
Yes, Fred Astaire was in Vaudeville. He started performing at age 4 but after he and his sister Adele got their act going they moved to playing on Broadway until 1933. The act stayed together until 1937 until Adele retired. After that Astaire made the move Hollywood.
I need my family to come together and start working on our own grandfather children and children children and do our DNA of family history of our family blood dis is one for sure we are Choctaw and French that means we are European and creole Mable Leflore is third generation I am fifth generation we all need to get our cdib cards and everything else we need to get this done for all our family members we need to get on his rolls this is my mom side and I have to get on my dad to
When I visited San Agustín the first city built in the current United States, as Spaniard I felt very proud. Besides seeing so many flags not only of US but also of Spain was wonderful. I drove from Miami to Washington DC and really the most kind people I have ever found in all my life (54 years old) have been the American people all along this trip. So good behaviour, kindness and happynes. Wonderful people. Thank You!. God Bless USA and Viva España!
Little reason have the inhabitants of Georgia and Alabama to complain that the government of the United States has been remiss or neglectful in protecting them from Indian hostilities, the fact is directly the reverse! The people of Alabama and Georgia are now suffering the recoil of their own unlawful weapons and backsliding. Georgia sir, Georgia by trampling upon the faith of our national treaties with the Indians Indian tribes, and by subjecting them to her state laws, first set the example of that policy which is now in the process of consummation by this Indian war, In setting this example, she bade defiance to the authority of the government of the nation; she nullified your laws; she set at naught your executive guardians of the common constitution of the land. To the mockery of signing other treaties with you, which at the first moment when it shall suit your purpose, you will again tear to tatters and scatter to the four winds of heaven the constitution, till the Indian race shall be extinct upon this continent, and it shall become a problem, beyond the solution of antiquaries and historical societies, what the red man of the forest was! There’s your British blood, your anglo Saxon race! Men who are driven from the civilized portion of the world for their crimes! There’s a gang for you! Texas is just the place for them! -Anti Texas Legion Remonstrance Benjamin Lundy and Some Free Northern States 1846 speech by John Quincy Adams on Georgia
What's the earliest reference - visual or text - for using two ropes? I'm dubious about the legend that 'Double Dutch' was introduced by settlers from the Netherlands. The earliest evidence I could find is in the 1951 Scottish short film 'The Singing Street'.
I loved how she said “piled on” when she was regarding the additional clothing she would wear after putting on her chamois and pantaloons! It’s so true!
Was it racist when Dave Chappelle put on whiteface? No, it was a funny show. Most white ppl loved it because they didn’t take themselves too seriously. It should be that way for everyone. U can hear there voices cracking from nerves. Calm down, u can talk about past and not cast judgement about a world u didn’t live in. The message of liberalism isn’t really needed as it’s only one point of view, men used to play all the female roles even further back, that was that world and they weren’t necessarily sexist because they dressed as women. Just talk about the facts of history and calm down. Hollywood still wants ppl to play their stereotype btw, it’s called typecasting and it enhances the storytelling experience. Ppl of all races have been stuck and broken through typecasting.
Lol hold on did you say refrigerator cat food? You messed up with that one! The 50s made canned cat food and because we where able to refrigerator that? Stick to facts please!
Wrong! Idk maybe before Mahmud was born idk trolling a little bit because to say Mahmud believed in no harm to humans nor animals. Idk maybe he did and everything turned into the Kararain. I didn't care for your voice at first. So maybe got very Interested on what you are saying. The whole Mahmud thing really questionable. You are a true non biased in your field! Keep doing what you do!❤
In Islam images of Mohammad are still prohibited today, by both those who belong to the Islamic faith but especially to those who are radicalized (like the ones who did violence in mass in Paris when a school teacher was bold enough to do it a few years ago and lost his life for it. So Paris is ₲℧Π shy of Islam but they (as well as many other parts of the world) have absolutely no problem mocking the Christian faith. In the Catholic faith a monastic person as well as the laity are called for work, worship, and leisure, and any action, from washing dishes to creating medieval Illuminated Manuscripts can be offered as a type of pence to God. You should really understand the Catholic faith, especially it’s history and traditions if you are going to continue to relate these beautiful works of art with our faith because a lot of of things you’re saying just isn’t true or you have a very poor understanding of it. I am a Catholic and a theologian and would be more than happy to answer any specific questions that you’re unsure of when you want to speak about how faith and Illuminated Manuscripts begin to converge and a better understanding of the medieval area worship in so far as talking about how the Bible is in Latin and how it was what was the language of that time period because that is not the case. The Bible’s were being written in Latin because the historic writings that eventually became the Holy Bible given by the Church to the faithful were based on 2 of the earliest translations, the Latin Vulgate and the Greek Septuagint. The Latin Vulgate is located at the Vatican in Rome but is accessible by anyone with internet access on a dot va domain. Both the Greek Septuagint and Codex Sinaitcus are currently located at the British Museum as are also available digitally on the respective websites. The Canonization of the Bible, both the Old and New Testament was a gradual process that occurred over many centuries and by many separate people, some being the living original Disciples of Jesus but more being people who knew and learned from those whom we now refer to as the ❝Early Church Fathers❞ (those who suffered martyrdom because of their faith). Relying on both the historic text and its accuracy was accepted by the Christian faith based on the Books of Moses which had been referred to by Jesus Himself (the creation of a historic copy of the Jewish Torah, the Prophets, and the writings is unique in and of itself because of the methods they used in a type of checks and balances to ensure exact copies). The New Testament however was created based on the various writings circulated among early Christian communities, including the Gospels, letters, and their texts which were attributed to the Apostles and early Christian leaders. As the early Christian movement grew there were concerns arising regarding false teachings (heresy’s) and the need for a standardized scripture. It wasn’t until Christianity became the official religion of Rome during the reign of Constantine (who gave us what you kind of tried to explain, the Chi Rho or ☧) and when an official church body became established these heresy’s eventually called for things such as Ecumenical Councils where those in positions of Apostolic Authority came together and applied the power, decrement, and authority. Only after many early councils which played a pivotal role in shaping the canon did the criteria for the inclusion varied and it wasn’t until around the 4th century AD (ce) was a consensus begin to emerge regarding the New Testament Canon (important councils, such as the Council of Carthage 397 AD/ce and it’s predecessor of the Council of Nicaea did the church formally affirm the list of books accepted as part of the New Testament. Books and writings which did not make it into the ❝official❞ canon were however compiled into two groups known by Protestants by the name of Apocrypha (many of which however were and continue to be part of the early Churches original canon but were removed during future translations for various reasons (most due to any conflict between someone who is a monarch); But in contrast by the Universal Church being called the Deuterocanonical Books. *caveat, if a person is familiar with the early heresy’s will see how those heretical ideas eventually included in early writings of Paul who backhandedly reaffirmed beliefs (such as docetism which is why you see Paul explicitly reaffirming Christ ❝IN THE FLESH❞ and the most pivotal and definitive heresy’s of Arianism and Donatism which almost ripped the early church in half. These most definitive and condemned heresy’s rose to an unprecedented number which led to the Pontifical and Magisterial definitive actions such as excommunication as a punishable offense of the continuing beliefs in the heresy’s of: ⦿ Arianism (belief that Jesus Christ was not fully divine and is a created being) ⦿ Donatism (where the first accusations of apostasy began because of the pride of bishops). ⦿ Apollinarianism (the belief that Jesus did not have a human mind or soul, but only a human body) ⦿ Tritheism (a belief that there are 3 gods, rather than one God in Three Persons ie. Trinity) ⦿ collyridianism (a belief that the trinity consists of the Father, Son, and Mary and that the Son results from the marital union between the other two *which called for the creation of documents which clearly defined carefully but integral language which we still must profess to this day to actually be a Christian ❶ The Apostles Creed ca. A.D. 750, the ❷ Nicene Creed in ca. A.D. 451 as the result of the Council of Nicaea, ❸ the Athanasian Creed which definitively refuted the heresy of Arianism, ❹ the Chalcedonian Definition ❺ the Didache. All future ❝creeds❞ were, by their mere existence were heretical in nature (such as those born out of the Council of Trent which gave rise to the creation and continuation of Protestantism’s). Ecumenical and historic Christian creeds: ► The Apostles Creen (120-250 A.D.) ► The Creed of Nicaea (325 A.D.) ► Nicene Creed (Nicea-Constantionopolitan creed) (381 A.D.) ► Chalsceoian Creed (451 A.D.) ► Athanasian Creed (500 A.D.) The Creeds of the early church: •The Didache (50-100 A.D.) • The Creed of Aristide of Athens (130 A.D.) • The Old Roman Symbol or Old Roman Creed (c.215) • The Creed of Cyprian of Carthage (250 A.D.) • the Deir Balyzeh Papyus (200-350 A.D.) • The Arian Creeds and Creeds of Euzoius (320/327 A.D.) • The Creed of Alexander of Alexandria (321-324 A.D.) • The First Synod of Antioch (extremely important) (325 A.D. / ce.) • The Second Dedication of Antioch (341 A.D.) • The Baptismal Creed of Jerusalem (350 A.D.) All of the creeds following these are considered ❝Interdenominational Creeds❞ and are not recognized as legitimate or some even heretical defiance. The Ecumenical Creeds are more than I care to write. Then again more illegitimate, unrecognized, false, and/or heretical creeds of the Adventist, the Anabaptist/Mennonite, Anglican, Assemblies of God, Baptist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Pentecostal (basically most all denominations who profess Christianity (ESPECIALLY LUTHERANISM AND CALVANIST) but are not in any type of Communion with the Universal Church in Rome. Ok, I got off course at some point so I’m just going to stop.
Ok, we need to help you with your Catholic Church because Catholic means Universal, and there was only 1 Christian Church until the Council of Trent. Saint Benedict is very important in the Catholic faith, still today, and his methods are still in use today (I go to a Benedictine Church) but that was not the norm, it was a very extreme outlier.
And they would be chained or locked down. When the Vikings began invading Britain the first place they went was the church because of everything made of gold and many times they would destroy the books just for the use of the paper but after a while they learned that they were very important to the Britain’s and that they would pay a lot of money for them.
That book is called the litany of the hours, which the Catholic Church still uses today. Wit the things like snails, rabbits, etc. I have a feeling they are associated with the sometimes strange art in gothic gargoyles.
I'm so appreciative of Georgia having leadership that upholds Ethics. I understand it isn't a popular point of public discussion nor popular position, to differ from (DT Republican faction), but I have no personal hesitancy in Applauding Ethics, and placing State, and Country, above an individual and their personal desire. I'm not a resident of Georgia, nor do I have a motive other than recognizing the Value of Respect for adhering to Ethics, and respecting the State and Federal Standards and Laws, that were upheld by whomever was involved in keeping with these Standards, and this having later been further supported again by the Voting Public of Georgia. It is worthy behavior, worth attention and recognition, regardless of ones Political affiliation. It demonstrates State and Country before Party and that is Higher Minded aka Mature Minded thought and action. ... and it deserves to be recognized and acknowledged. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian For the record, I'm an ("Independent Constitutionalist", a Moderate that tilts Left), I do not fot in the restricted claim of News Media's produced idea that all are either "Far Right or Far Left".
Very good presentation. I think the hauderk he is wearing may not be corect for the Normans. The Baouxe Tapestry shows armor with short trousers and coifes intigrated to the armor.
You are (most likely) correct sir... based on evidence it is probable that if a warrior had a coif, it was integral to the hauberk. That being said, I used what I had but probably should have clarified! :) And thanks for the compliment!
