The New Centre for Research & Practice is an international, non-profit, higher education institute in the Arts, Humanities, and Sciences, offering graduate & professional-development level certificate programs, workshops, seminars, exhibitions, residencies, and conferences in Art & Curatorial Practice, Critical Philosophy, Media & Technology, Social & Political Thought, and Transdisciplinary Research & Practice. Our carefully selected network of thinkers and scholars advise and assist those seeking to make the transition between undergraduate and graduate schools, between graduate school and the professions, and between early career to advanced-career development. Through studying at the New Centre, students practice graduate & professional development-level research in a manner that does not interrupt their existing artistic, academic, or professional aspirations, but instead complements, enhances, and intensifies them. The New Centre is conceived upon the idea that the space of knowl
the phi beta kappa kappa beta phi partnership and the economic club of DC and the companies that fund the gatherings are what you need to be looking into the C- suite social networks are your owners. No secrecy needed theres nothing you can do about it. its factions of power players with domains of control authority and influence the intellectually elite secret society are in public right before your eyes .
Keats, opening of The Fall of Hyperion: Fanatics have their dreams, wherewith they weave A paradise for a sect; the savage too From forth the loftiest fashion of his sleep Guesses at Heaven; pity these have not Trac'd upon vellum or wild Indian leaf The shadows of melodious utterance. But bare of laurel they live, dream, and die; For Poesy alone can tell her dreams, With the fine spell of words alone can save Imagination from the sable charm And dumb enchantment. Who alive can say, 'Thou art no Poet may'st not tell thy dreams?' Since every man whose soul is not a clod Hath visions, and would speak, if he had loved And been well nurtured in his mother tongue. Whether the dream now purpos'd to rehearse Be poet's or fanatic's will be known When this warm scribe my hand is in the grave.
HyperObject Beyond Identification Origin of the Term "HyperObject" The exact origins of the term "HyperObject" are hard to pinpoint. Timothy Morton popularized the term in his 2013 book Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. He defines HyperObjects as things that are massively distributed in time and space relative to humans-examples include climate change and black holes. Morton blends quantum theory and relativity into philosophy, pushing us to rethink how we understand the world. In the Anthropocene, he argues, we can perceive HyperObjects through data and mathematics, which forces us to think ecologically and holistically. When I try and think of what a classical hyperobject might look like, two examples come to mind. Although not explicitly described as hyperobjects, there does seem to be some similarities. The first example is a playful one, The End of the Universe, from Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Milliways is a fictional restaurant situated at the end of time and space, offering diners a unique view of the universe's end. This establishment exemplifies the characteristics of a hyperobject due to its vast temporal and spatial scale, existing beyond ordinary human experience. The restaurant's ability to provide a perspective on the entirety of the universe's lifespan helps us wrap our heads around what a hyperobject could be. The second example, more philosophical, is Terence McKenna's Transcendental Object at the End of Time, a concept representing a singularity that contains all possibilities and meanings. McKenna envisioned this object as the culmination of history and human experience, a point of ultimate convergence and novelty. This idea aligns with the notion of hyperobjects, being vast, complex, and beyond full human comprehension. And after some imaginative exploration I plug it into the Intellidoscope to see what kind of perspectival equation we can formulate. •X h( zi q( o) Z𝐈 (O )Q zi )H Y• Straightaway I know that my perspective on what is considered to be human goes beyond classical physics philosophy and psychology, but I'm curious about what it would mean to redefine a hyperobject. There are many insights that come up, for example energy distribution over the transform, but for now I think I would like to focus on perspective and cross categorical relationships Redefinition: I propose that a HyperObject goes beyond SpaceTime, while still enabling processes within it. Think of it like this: "Unity is to Universe as Connected is to Cosmos." The HyperObject isn’t just about unification or even connectivity-it’s about both and more. It’s emergent, meaning it holds space for new possibilities and acts as an enabler for change. If we think of change as a constant then we may witness novel behavior. The SpaceTime between “Hyper” and “Object” is a continuum-simple yet complex at the same time. Implications for Self-Discovery: A HyperObject gives us the ability to see how our holicity is connected to our unitality, helping us understand how our actions can have far reaching impacts. By recognizing that HyperObjects include the frameworks in which we identify ourselves, we can start to see evolution as something that is mutually shaped and shapes the forces that bind us. In this sense, we are more than the sum of our parts. This redefinition marks a paradigm shift, offering a higher-dimensional standpoint. I hope this encourages further exploration, not just of our physical existence, but also the holistic nature of who we are.
Thank you for your comment. Yes, you can either become a RU-vid Member through our Channel, or check our other Membership options: thenewcentre.org/membership/member/. If you have any questions, please reach out to us at studentservices@thenewcentre.org.
1) "If you fear a conspiracy, start one of your own, and arrest everyone who joins." 1¹) To find a genuine secret society, ignore them all & go on alone.
I stumbled upon this site but within a few minutes saw that it was not a deep discussion of secret societies. It is simply an attempted assertion of assumptions based upon current societal conceptions of what they are and their reasons for existing. On one of the first tablets shown the date of 2800 BC is listed and a question is asked about one line of the verse where the end of the world is mentioned. The speaker wonders why this first civilization would think about such things. The answer is quite simple yet he never mentions it. It is because it was not the first civilization. Our ancestors are those who survived the Younger Dryas over 12000 years ago and they had also survived the Burkle Crater event between 5000 and 6000 years ago which is a possible marker for the Biblical flood. In other words our world has been and will be restarted many times. Unfortunately there is not a single branch of science one can go to and learn about this. One must study many branches at once. Also even in our times the so called mainstream academics are very resistant to even considering this possibility seriously. This discussion appears to also seek to promote the idea that these secret societies are the same as cults. Admittedly some will be and this is unfortunate. I would suggest however that those who are seeking to explore the Mysteries follow their heart. You will learn as you go and with enough effort maybe a true initiate will find you or more likely that you will find one another. The Mystery Schools that we know of were descended from currently unknown/unacknowledged sources existing prior to the end of the last ice age. Every major secret society in the world at some point in their teachings will reveal that they originated in what Plato called Atlantis although in countries that are non Western the name tends to be changed to something else. It was an ancestor of Plato, Solon that first was told about Atlantis from the Priests at Sais in Egypt. Atlantis was not just a single continent or island however. It was the entire world. During the last ice age most settlements would have existed on coast lines. Whatever triggered the end of the Younger Dryas had enough energy to rapidly melt the majority of the existing ice coverage which resulted in rapid rise of sea level. The first part was very rapid, within a few days or less while the remainder occurred over years/decades. At the end of it sea level had risen over 400 feet. Several islands and all coastal cities would have been destroyed. In any case do not think that the Secret Societies exist to only manipulate others or that they seek to form cults. Even before the destruction of Poseidonus, the Capitol of Atlantis in 9564 BC there was a split in the ranks of the spiritual schools. Regardless of the era you will always have those who wish to manipulate and those who wish to show the way to Freedom. In response to the speakers comments about these societies being used by revolutionaries I can give a perfect example of this and why it is necessary. This involves the Knights Templar. They had the unfortunate honor of rediscovering that it tends to be the Church and the State who are the enemies of freedom. Although academic history tells us they were wiped out the truth is that they went underground and remain to this day.
an intriguingly right leaning Galactic Federation of Light is a great candidate ...it is like mycelium below the surface and has an easily projected trend down the road ...seems to be feeding on maga and operation bluebeam conspiracy a coagulation of two large groups ...they also seem to be reaching out because I have a brother in law that has been targeted despite his hight intelligence it played on his ego and he seems to be on board... as an elite secret maga soldier waiting for his orders ... the group is in talks with aliens via telepathy and a few chosen ... the fact it hasn't been properly exposed tells me it might be being allowed to mature slowly Speculative guess the numbers are now over a million
Secret societies/invisible colleges are still with us even though the majority have lost their way in teaching and many think it os most often a way for them to hain money and that goes for chirches as well. However though, they can now be found by judicious searching online and in basements and attics of homes and various other buildings and institutions. We desperately need these old ways to return and I strongly urge everyone to search these old tomes out. It is also wise to search out the remaining so called secret societies as well as Madam Blavatsky, Dr. Rudolph Steiner, Dr. Karl Young etc. The aboved named people's works can mostly be found on RU-vid and other sites. Please search these wisdom and spiritual teachings out and make good use of them to your best abilities for your benefit and the benefit of humanity as well. Sincerely, Stephen Miller, BS.
I just found your channel, I really dig it, i've been researching this stuff for years and years. What nationality are you?My wife's from mumbai.India is why I ask.
I have been saying this for about a year...I might not be in one but the stuff I'm understanding and learning have been difficult to find except from lectures like this from university or Ted or big think....you tube might turn brains to mush but if you use it right it will take you to school...and at least get you to the Greek.
@@NewCentre Thank you for your response! But I am searching for this series (also the seminar on Poetic & Cinematic Evil) in the Membership section of the channel. I have tried searching using the titles of the series, key words, the instructor's name, etc. I cannot find the next parts of these series :( Will all parts be in their own playlist?
@@NewCentre Oh, nevermind... I found some other parts & I think I can find them all. It's just isn't searchable, so I have to scroll through chronologically to find each part. This is excellent content though and I am so invested. Thank you for your help!
Thank you! If you like our content, consider becoming a Member: thenewcentre.org/membership/member/. We currently have special rates for two and three year Memberships, which will give you access to our entire Archive containing almost 10 years of Seminars and Workshops.
This seminar or whatever it is is incredibly (un)holy. Bravo to everyone who participated in it and special thanks to Reza Negarestani for his glorious sermons as a philosophical figurehead for our time. Jesus! I mean Allahu Akbar!!! ;)
Have you heard fo A. Dugin idea of 3 logoses Appolo- patriarchy Dionysis-something in beween Cybelle- matriarchy Its kinda similar to desert/forest/jungle
That's an interesting point about non-nationals being in national pavilions. The Perpetual Gypsy Pavilion of 2009 was early in this way: perpetualmobile.wordpress.com/the-perpetual-gypsy-pavilion/. The Yidishland Pavilion was a structurally similar initiative in 2022: yiddishlandpavilion.art/
Thank you @Graeberwave, you can access the other parts of this Seminar by purchasing a Membership (thenewcentre.org/membership/member/) or through a RU-vid Membership!
You can either buy a RU-vid Membership on our profile or sign up for a Membership in our website thenewcentre.org/membership/member/, which includes a @thenewcentre.org email. If you have any questions please contact studentservices@thenewcentre.org.
According to RN, we should forgive others for... selfish reasons? Loving another person and forgiving them under the Christian paradigm is bad because... it's selfless? It's excentric? It's healing for all parties, and "heaps coals of fire on their head" (Romans 12:20)? Instead, according to RN, we should forgive others to "understand the new threshold of our enemy"? And how is Christian forgiveness "passive"? Stoicism is the nothing but the practice of fleeing from suffering. Avoidance of hard things. Christianity/Catholicism is the opposite. It's the endurance of suffering within the world to be "conformed to the image of His Son" (Romans 8:29). Very weak anti-Christian polemic from Negarestani.
38:40 Correct. To know more about this read "The Kind of Motion We Call Heat (Volume II)" by Stephen G. Brush, e.g.: “The suggestion that eternal recurrence might be proved as a theorem of physics, rather than as a religious or philosophical doctrine, seems to have occurred at about the same time to the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and the French mathematician Henri Poincaré. Nietzsche encountered the idea of recurrence on his studies of classical philology, and again in a book by Heine. It was not until 1881 that he began to take it seriously, however, and then he devoted several years to studying physics in order to find a scientific-sounding formulation of it. Poincaré on the other hand, was led to the subject by his attempts to complete Poisson's proof of the stability of the solar system, though he was also concerned with the difficulty of explaining irreversibility by mechanical models such as Helmholtz's monocyclic systems. Poincaré's theorem belongs to the history of theoretical physics, Nietzsche's speculations to the history of philosophical culture, and they are not usually discussed in the same context. Yet I find it necessary to consider them together since it was just at the end of the 19th century that developments in science were strongly coupled to the philosophical-cultural background. Both Nietzsche and Poincaré were trying, though in very different ways, to attack the "materialist" or "mechanist" view of the universe.”
