The Coalition for Marriage is an umbrella group of individuals and organisations in the UK that support one-man, one-woman marriage, and oppose any plans to redefine it.
He really didn't have any good points. But he was respectful. I'll give him that. A large portion of his argument was basically "we've always done it this way." Most would reject such a lame argument in subjects that don't cross into the realm of religious morality.
Gotta love how Piers keeps trying to make it personal because without that, he don't have a leg to stand on. Referring to dear old 'susie' or asking this gentleman what his personal opinions are in the matter (relevance). What it comes down to is this, marriage is between a man and a woman AS PER GOD'S WORD. Without that, it IS just someone's opinion. And this poor guy can't make the claim that Susie does not have the right to marry her perverted partner without it - even IF he is correct. And the superiority and importance of God's Word is just something that Piers - or any lost person, is not ABLE to understand. The Bible even says the unsaved cannot understand the things of God. And arguing about God's Word while trying to step around it is pointless. Bring God back into the conversation and it ends the argument immediately. Answer: because GOD. End of.
Marriage is between a man and a woman. And I don't care how many people disagree with that. These people are highly misguided. P.S Piers really is a MORON.
Against God.. Nature. science. And the physical Organs. Even Plants Male pollinates female. Gays should stop disturbing us and get out of church. Why don't they join Islam
I feel bad for Piers Morgan for having such an ignorant and idiot crowd that she can’t make a point to defend her position when she calls him uneducated and then draws applause
Marriage is not a religious issue, so any argument about marriage between two men or two women is moot! Religion is a choice people make for themselves and so religious issues should not be made "mainstream" for all people! Young people are not going to church after they leave the family nest because they comprehend the futility of "running to a church to let a minister or priest think for them." Church membership is going to decline because people are becoming less fearful to think on their own and make their own decisions! It is the "sin-consciousness" that churches preach that has wreaked havoc on our world in encouraging all that is bad in society!
My husband and I have been married 9 years, in October we’ve been together 33 years. When we moved for his career 18 years ago, I stayed home to take care of business in our new house. His new company was all for covering me under his health insurance policy, but they weren’t quite sure how to do it........ legally. Theyre final solution was for us to travel to the nearest state where it was legal, and get married. So we drove 3 hours, spent the night in a hotel, then got married the next morning at the county courthouse. The following week when all the paper work was filed, I was covered under his policy. We were very happy. Two years later around the time of my fathers death, I hadn’t been feeling well but assumed it was all the traveling back and forth 800 miles one way, to take care of his estate. I saw a handful of doctors who couldn’t figure it out. The week we sold my dads house we found out what the problem was. I had stage3 cancer and needed to start treatment immediately. My head was spinning. It took over a year of treatment considering chemo, radiation, surgery, a 2 month hospital stay, plus all the drugs I now take, but I can’t imagine what would have happened if I weren’t insured. Our insurance company paid 1.3 million, we paid over $30K. I had another cancer diagnosis a few years ago that wasn’t as dramatic. I’m very tired, but thankful for my husbands company, and his insurance policy.
@@macysondheimit wasn’t a fun situation. If we hadn’t my inheritance from my parents, I don’t know what the outcome would be. I remember my first prescription was over $3000.00, after insurance our payment was about $300.00. I feel very lucky to have the insurance I have, but I also felt a bit selfconscious knowing other patients weren’t getting the same “perks” I recieved.
The question is not "How do we change the minds of people who oppose gay marriage?" The question is, "Do they have the right to impose their beliefs on others?" The answer is, "No". Prayers.
Impose beliefs? One side is tolerant and the other side pushes their agenda through everything and every way possible. Openly indoctrinating and sexualizing children at school, parading through the streets committing acts of degeneracy.
It's just not right, it''s not biblical the end. Common sense. Just be gay but don't corrupt marriage. Divorce went up after they passed the gay marriage law.
Should someone be allowed to marry someone just because he loves the person? No! What if a person wants to marry his 12 year old daughter? The question that needs to be asked is if we are not going to define sexual immorality as anything outside the bonds of marriage between a man and woman, then where do we define it and by what authority do we define it ?
My belief is whatever denomination you are in you should follow the teaching of the Bible what Welby is doing is not right he endorsed Gay marriage He is promoting Sodom and Gomorrah . The immorality was what angered God The whole city was filled with men having set with men and even encouraged visiting male to have sex with them The whole cities was full of fifth that God rained down fire and destroyed the whole cities if that is what Welby is preaching he is working for Satan
Being legally married doesn't mean people stay together in a happy relationship. I've known people who haven't seen their spouses in 10, 20 or 30+ years yet they are legally married. They have created completely sperate lives with other people. Getting rid of no-fault divorce will not keep people together.
Yes, it will. Many people who divorce when the could have otherwise worked it out. It makes sense to divorce in the case of willful unsupported or abuse, but a lot of people could have made it work. I will also add that many don’t think things through enough.
Suze knows that her relationship with a woman is WRONG. That's why she is desperately looking for support and low key insulting and downplaying what Ryan is saying.
Majority of the people in the world are AGAINST homosexuality and gay marriage. But the Media makes it look as if the majority supports it. It's a satanic agenda. That's why it's being forced upon the world.
What does Christ our Lord say & support Mr. Welby? We cant have a foot on both sides of the fence. Jesus loved Mary Magdalene, yet would he marry her knowing she was a prostitute? Well the prophet Hoshea was told by God to marry a prostitute, & to tell her of the consequences if she didnt repent, preaching the consequences on Israel they were to experience by their continued ignoring God's Word, seen in their eventual captivity & suffering from the Assyrian army when the people & the later king, would not listen to God & repent, of their ways. But would he send Hoshea to marry a man? I think the people would be totally confused by that. Remember Sodom & Gomorrah.. & remember also the consequences to Lot's wife of her disobeying the warning of God.
All the Bishops have to do is either read Scripture or Pray to God about an issue ...we dont need a lecture , its quite simple really, just read the Bible ...😮
people thought that man can use legislation to force people into thinking that that makes same sex marriage legal. This is a dictatorial form of imposing truth by legislation. Changing the definition of marriage by preference and making it a law they thought made it legal but it isn't moral neither ethical. The means doesn't justify the end
*"people thought that man can use legislation to force people into thinking that that makes same sex marriage legal This is a dictatorial form of imposing truth by legislation.."* People thought that men can use legislation to force religious proclamations that make same-sex marriage illegal. This is a dictatorial form of imposing "truth" by legislation. Don't act like "dictatorial" and "force" is something YOU'RE opposed to, when you and your belief would, if sufficient support from the masses allowed you to manipulate the mechanisms of the state as you have for SO LONG, would use force and dictatorial control to deny equal rights to same-sex couples. It's feigned nonsense coming from someone like you. *"Changing the definition of marriage by preference"* The definition of marriage has been changed throughout all of human history, by preference. Even your myth once defined it as being polygamous. *'and making it a law they thought made it legal but it isn't moral neither ethical."* There's no rational argument you can present to define same-sex marriage as being immoral or unethical. *"The means doesn't justify the end"* Exactly. Regardless of those means, even when those "means" are religious proclamations.
