Reach Higher at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, a regional research university, part of the world-renowned University of Colorado system, located in the foothills of Pikes Peak.
I AM A BORN AGAIN BELIVER IN JESUS CHRIST AND I AM 54yrs OLD AND ALL THIS KNOWLEDGE SHE IS PROMOTING IS ABOUT DESTROYING AMERICA FOR A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT SYSTEM. WE IN THE THIRD WORLD WAS WAITING TO SEE ALL THESE MOVEMENTS IN AMERICA AND EUROPE SO WE CAN SEE BIBLE PROPHECY BEING FULLFILLED.
SHE HAS NO IDEA ABOUT THE FUTURE WHICH MEANS SHE HAS NO FAITH IN BIBLE TEACHINGS ON THIS OUTCOME.SO SHE IS NOT BORN AGAIN;DOES NOT SPEAK IN TONGUES;NEVER WITNESS CASTING OUT OF DEMONS OR HEALING;SO SHE IS SPIRITUALLY DEAD.ANOTHER HIT JOB ON BIBLE BELIVING CHRISTIANS.UNIONS HAVE THEIR HISTORY IN SOCIALISM AND POWERFULL UNIONISM CAN DESTROY A COUNTRY UNLES IT IN EXCHANGE FOR BENIFITS IT LEADS TO HIGHER OUTPUT AND LOWER COMPETITIVE PRICING.
THAT IS DISGRACEFULL TO SAY THE EVANGELICALS ARE DUMB IN THEOLOGY;MOST WILL NOT GO TO A BIBLE SCHOOL BUT THEY DO GO TO THEIR CHURCH BIBLE LECTURES AND CLASSES.AND THEY ARE FOCUSSED ON FAITH,LIFE AND THE RAPTURE.
WHITE EVANGELICALS ARE NOT SCARED OFF THE CHANGING CULTURAL VALUES;THIS IS SOMETHING EXPECTED AND STATED IN SCRIPTURE;WE ARE ALL ABOUT SAVING SOULS UNTILL WE CAN NOT DO IT AGAIN AND THEN THEY WILL CEASE WITNESSING EXCEPT FOR CHARITY BECAUSE THE RAPTURE WILL BE UPON US. THIS SPIRITUALLY DEAD CARNAL CHRISTIAN DOES NOT HAVE A CLUE OF WHAT IS in THE BORN AGAIN EVANGELICAL MINDS[white,black,brown,etc].POLITICS IS THAT A BUFFER NARATIVE FOR WHEN THIS EXPECTED TIME IS SOON TO OCCUR.
This woman calls herself a christian but during the 60's to the 80's evangelicals were all about the rapture and the end of the world by the end of the 1980's;so Jesus did not come so the evangelicals had a problem so they shifted to prosperity preaching upto now 2024,but soon they will be going back to that preaching soon en masse.POLITICS is just a way to be in cultural debate and preserving the right to worship and witness and the bill of rights.
so why they supported Reagan,Geogre bush senior and junior? This woman is so confuse? So who would go to war at that time,since most of the country was identified as belivers in christ.
Only a few months before Dr. DuMez's excellent presentation here, a young man brought up in white Christian nationalism/patriarchy took an AK-47 into Club Q killing and wounding people he was taught to hate.💜❤🩹💔😢
At the Oscars where Sasheen Littlefeather was refusing Marlon Brando’s Oscar The real human John Wayne had to be physically restrained by three large men from attacking her and dragging her off stage. Not a good vision of a Christlike man.
Really sad to hear a scholar dismiss John Wayne so unprofessionally. I’m a liberal and certainly find some quotes attributed to Wayne distasteful, but Wayne in no way represents today’s MAGA knuckle draggers. To me the worst aspect of Wayne’s career was his support of the Vietnam War. But a scholar would also take into account Stalin’s purges and gulags or Mao’s millions of starvation deaths and the cultural revolution as reasons for fear of communism. I have watched all of his critically acclaimed movies and do not see mysogeny glorified but the opposite, he always defers to the woman who is usually a very strong, smart character. He respects native Americans in his movies as valiant adversaries. He is, like most of us who have the courage to admit it, flawed and noble, intelligent and ignorant.
You are so right in saying we are all a mixed bag of sentiments and ideas but I think you may be conflating John Wayne's movie roles with the real human John Wayne who was so "masculine" in the negative sense that he refused to seek medical attention for the cough that eventually killed him. It took a lot of pushing and eventual bullying from his wife Pilar to get him to the doctor and treat the lung cancer that was its cause. Had he listened to her in the beginning he could have lived much longer. Toxic masculinity hurts men too and as the mother of a son I feel the pain of its effect; I knew very few people who didn't grow up afraid of their fathers due to this vision of what a man should be.
I would like to hear a discussion between Dumez and Xi Van Fleet. How does her analysis about Christian nationalism stand up against the dangers presented by the totalitarianism of Mao’s China? And how did unions contribute to the loss of employment in America (businesses looking for cheaper workers)? Also, the 1619 Project is NOT basic history. It seems her analysis is based on the plumb line of gender/race rather than on the plumb line of the Word. She doesn’t discuss the influence of Herbert Marcuse on the 60’s era. How he influenced the civil rights movement, anti-war movement, feminism, and the sexual revolution. The Religious Right formed as a backlash against this campus ideology which was permeating America. Trying to equate Christian nationalism (defined by Dumez as patriarchy) with sexual abuse in the church is an absolute stretch. Christian nationalism as a way to be grateful for freedom and to oppose the dangers that are presented to democracy by neo-Marxist ideology is never considered. Dumez seems to be lacking so much in understanding/perceiving the historical evangelical perspective.
