The Pastoral Guide, by Pope St Gregory the Great "Pastors who lack foresight hesitate to say openly what is right because they fear losing the favour of men. As the voice of truth tells us, such leaders are not zealous pastors who protect their flocks, rather they are like mercenaries who flee by taking refuge in silence when the wolf appears. The Lord reproaches them through the prophet: They are dumb dogs that cannot bark. On another occasion he complains: You did not advance against the foe or set up a wall in front of the house of Israel, so that you might stand fast in battle on the day of the Lord. To advance against the foe involves a bold resistance to the powers of this world in defence of the flock. To stand fast in battle on the day of the Lord means to oppose the wicked enemy out of love for what is right." [Office of Readings Sun Oct 6,2024]
So good to hear your voice again....and the screen door and they dog whistle and then of course there is your primary content . Thank you and may our Lord Jesus Christ continue to bless you n yours.
If you combine the Palestine-Israel book reviews of Stephen Heiner and the materials referred to here, on Dr. Deep State, and Will Tucker's new channel you will be well set up to tackle the current debate.
The roots of Freemasonry are in the Middle East. The oldest lodges are actually there! sophism sufism. This is more easily researched in French literature, and French anti Catholic homage to Mahomed as the world's greatest leader. In Sufism the acolyte is 'possessed' by each 'Biblical Prophet' in turn at each grade. Sufism and islam are from the same post temple psyop. There were also Europeans (mostly British) in India who 'turned turk' and have written books on esoteric groups. Victorians gone native are a rich trove.
My wife and I are enjoying, thank you so much. I had just finished Walsh's "Character's of the Inquisition" and was searching for this book. Providentially came across your readings - Wonderful!
Dr Jones has written two of the most important books of the last 50 years - Libido Dominandi and Barren Metal. But he simply refuses to see that V2 captured the (visible) Church. So that sedevacantism is, really, the only catholic position possible.
Why do reactionaries always gloss over "the dialectic" as some kind of foreign, enemy, instrument or framing device, and never grapple with it as what it is, which is a plain fact of reason and experience, which, _by reacting,_ they are inherently participating in? Hegel didn't invent it! Plato and Socrates didn't invent it! It's literally just how thinking works! You, the reactionary, dislike your impression of the present state of affairs, as something within it contradicts your interests, and so you partake in thought and action oriented toward resolving the dissonance of that contradiction.
We are not referring to dialectic as a discursive tool but as an ontology. See the video we did on Philosophical Marranos or Taubes's essay: Analogy and Dialectic.
1:24:54 The Second World War, at least superficially, was not caused by extreme nationalism, but by trying to repair the effects of extreme nationalism. Germany was not interested in a program of expansion, but merely of recovering the ancient and traditional lands stolen from them by the Treaty of Versailles, which any rational person must admit was the most dunderheaded "agreement" of modern times, virtually guaranteed to spark further unrest.
1:21:04 And you have to wonder why that prelate was not excommunicated, or at least sanctioned. Recall, that this whole conflict started because an Archduke was shot! Yes, the Germans violated Belgian neutrality with their Schlieffen Plan, and that technically was a War Crime, but it should not be forgotten that it was the BRITISH who introduced the indiscriminate bombing of cities, not the Germans, and it was the BRITISH who first violated the Geneva Convention by a TOTAL blockade of the Baltic Sea, BEFORE the Germans resorted to Unrestricted Submarine Warfare. If the politicians would have been honest, they could have admitted that the "sins" of their respective militaries was a geopolitical round robin, and could have gone to the negotiating table with rapproachment in mind... Meanwhile, Pope Benedict, like Pius XII, was strangely silent against the propaganda, and refrained from condemning the war crimes of the "Allies".
1:01:11 The Second World War had a greater moral justification??? Oh yes, Colonel, it did, but not for the British and Americans. Do you know that soldiers from EVERY NATION IN EUROPE participated in Operation Barbarossa against the Soviets in 1941? Yes, they were trying to liberate Russia from the evil Bolsheviks, who had perpetrated nothing but slaughter on the Russian people since 1917. But Churchill and Roosevelt were nothing but buffoons and Bankster Puppets. (Hitler was too, but that is a story for another day.) Meanwhile, Emperor Karl could have unilaterally signed an armistice with Britain and France and Russia at any point in the war, especially after the Russians sued for peace in 1917. Austria really had very little vested interest in the war at that point. In my opinion Emperor Karl was also just a Bankster Puppet, and all his peace manoeuvers ultimately just so much show.
44:54 The Generals on both sides of the Battle of the Somme were not stupid, but diabolical. If they would have been logical, they would have tested their predictions of the effects of an artillery barrage on a limited area, rather than just assuming the effects and doing a full-fledged engagement. Rather, it was a calculated slaughter.
39:41 The technological developments were all foreseen before the war. One sees here an overarching narrative being imposed on the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente alike. World War One was ultimatley all choreographed theatre, making utterly no sense from a political perspective. Its only purpose was to maximize destruction and loss of life.
38:45 The "November Criminals" scapegoated by the Nazis were quite real. The means of production in Germany was largely controlled by Jewish Bankers, and these, after the so-called Balfour Declaration that was wrested from the British by the Rothschilds, went into action, sabotaging the German military and economy, while meanwhile the armistice negotiated by the Germans was completely unrealistic, as at the time they were winning the war. (The British had been on the verge of surrender in 1916, before the entry of America into the war...)
28:45 This is quite interesting because the Colonel is obliquely over the target here. Yes, the First World War was a conspiracy of the revolutionaries. But, maybe, just maybe, Colonel, another colonel, namely, Albert Pike, had outlined the purpose of the First World War- really the second world war, as the Franco Prussian War, when Albert Pike sent his letter to Guiseppe Mazzini, the real first World War, the so-called Franco-Prussian War, was raging in France and Italy- the same conflict, though seemingly not so. But no that's tinfoil-hat conspiracy stuff. We don't talk about that here.
26:38 "Dem' Evil Nazis" is a myth, Colonel Jamie Bogle. If you have not figured that out in 2024, you are light years behind the curve. Sheeple analysis on Vendee Radio... Tssk, Tssk. Next thing you'll be telling us is that Bin Laden and Saddam conspired to bring down the Twin Towers....
25:02 Cardinal Gibbons, like Cardinal Rampolla, was also a member of the OTO. So his letter to President Wilson, who was more than likely also a Satanic Pederast, is not at all surprising. The original purpose of the National Catholic Welfare Conference, the forerunner of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, was to support the American "War Effort".
12:49 All the land grabs of Italy are just so much distraction and theatre. World War I was planned by the Banksters, and perhaps the reason Pius X could foresee the Accession of Emperor Karl was his inside knowledge of the coming assassination of Ferdinand? It must not be forgotten that the reason we got the Son of Polish Immigrants on the Holy Seat in 1903 was because of the veto of Cardinal Rampolla, on grounds he was a member of the Ordo Templis Orientis as per the revelations of Monsignor Jouin. Pius X had to have known this, yet never made a move to defrock Rampolla. HMMMMMMM..... Meanwhile, the Licence Plate on the car that carried the Archduke Ferdinand to his doom reads "A11II18"... Armistice November 11th, 1918? Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us. You are our only hope!
Reflect on the following: can I with honesty, in the sight of Almighty God, acknowledge Pope St. Pius X as a true Pope, and at the same time acknowledge Francis as a true Pope?
If it is necessary to salvation to submit to the Roman Pontiff as the Church infallibly teaches, then it is also necessary to determine who that Pope is, or if he exists. If such is a precept of salvation, God would not make it impossible to figure out. It is simple: an authority given by God cannot promulgate evil, therefore these men are not true Popes. It is out of love for the papacy and carrying out the duty of submission to a true Pope that this conclusion is made.
Perhaps Sebastian Morello could come on to address the freemasonry of De Maistre and Steiner. Apparently a disciple of Steiner is writing a forward for Sebastian’s forthcoming book.
It's time to get real; really real. Be not afraid. Man up. Seek truth; - embrace the Orthodox Church which is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church founded by the Lord Jesus Christ. Leaving the Roman Catholic Church for Orthodoxy is the best thing I did. Glory to God! ☦☦☦
Which one of the various "autocephalus" Orthodox churches did you join; I hope it isn't one of the ones that have been excommunicated by the other or vice-versa. There is no unity in so called Orthodoxy.
William H. Prescott: "After an extensive period of study, during which he sporadically contributed to academic journals, Prescott specialized in late Renaissance Spain and the early Spanish Empire. His works on the subject, The History of the Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella the Catholic (1837), The History of the Conquest of Mexico (1843), A History of the Conquest of Peru (1847) and the unfinished History of the Reign of Phillip II (1856-1858) have become classic works in the field, and have had a great impact on the study of both Spain and Mesoamerica."
John Paul ll's mother was jewish and his father was catholic, however there were plenty of frankists and sabbateans everywhere in Europe infiltrating all institutions. We will know them from their friut.
Frankists and Sabbateans were especially active in Poland. It is where Jakob Frank and his disciples were received into the Catholic Church with Polish nobility acting as their godparents. Imagine what an effect that would have had on the Church in Poland.
E Michael Jones says that Vatican II should be (and will be eventually) interpreted in light of Tradition and the Church will move on. But this may be easier said than done considering what Pope John Paul II said In response to Abp Lefebvre consecrating 4 bishops: 4. The root of this schismatic act can be discerned in an incomplete and contradictory notion of Tradition. Incomplete, because it does not take sufficiently into account the living character of Tradition, which, as the Second Vatican Council clearly taught, "comes from the apostles and progresses in the Church with the help of the Holy Spirit. There is a growth in insight into the realities and words that are being passed on. This comes about in various ways. It comes through the contemplation and study of believers who ponder these things in their hearts. It comes from the intimate sense of spiritual realities which they experience. And it comes from the preaching of those who have received, along with their right of succession in the episcopate, the sure charism of truth." (Apostolic Letter "Ecclesia Dei")
The interviewer is awesome. I like how he words the questions. He’s able to put into words our confusion and Louie Verecchio does a great job in providing answers.
