@@AMC2283 Evolutionary geneticists have often experimented on fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes hoping they would lead to new and better species, but these have all failed to accomplish their goal. No truly new species has ever been produced, let alone a new "basic kind." A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that: . . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.
@@wesleyschneider926that’s not proper evolution, that’s extreme mutation through artificial means. It’s like throwing a pot of water into a roaring fire and saying “see, it didn’t put it out. Water can’t put out fire” it does work just not in that method
@@peterstoric6560 Evolutionary geneticists have often experimented on fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes hoping they would lead to new and better species, but these have all failed to accomplish their goal. No truly new species has ever been produced, let alone a new "basic kind." A current leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that: . . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.
Ironic that this process was so much more 'ecological' than the artificial hydrocarbons we now produce in inconceivable amounts and have poisoned our own bodies as well as all the marine creatures on this planet.
Beautiful work! I once read a scientist observing that getting hit by one of these was like having a crate of apples dropped from a 10 story building on you. Or words to that effect. They were apparently an ambush predator that liked to drop from high trees. The Maori were rightly afraid of them. There are raptors with similar wingspan such as the Andean Condor, but these had greater bulk. In Mongolia today the smaller Golden Eagles are still used to kill wolves, and in South America Harpy Eagles hunt primates, so these must have been very powerful predators. There is no way that these would have been allowed to coexist with human populations whose first priorities were of survival in a land largely devoid of food sources. Also, they didn’t have to lift their prey as they’d simply eat it where it fell. There were no other predators to compete with apart from other eagles, and then later humans.
@@lewiscaddell1673 this is the STUPIDEST idea that I have ever seen. You would have to be so simple that you could not open a soda can to believe this garbage.
@@lewiscaddell1673 you are telling me that a whale, which was fine on land, jumped into the water and stayed there for millions of years until it grew fins? Are you slow?
@@brokelahoma1611 it clearly is real and Ethier your arrogant or just plain wrong this is supported by several different sources and evidence so please do some research
