Тёмный
Mathist
Mathist
Mathist
Подписаться
Welcome to math window

Here you can find many great Math Questions and interesting math question

find many questions about algebra, equation calculations, comparings• math Olympiad problem 🤩🤩🤩🤩
In the video,l often introduce some really fantastic topic and trick wich you will have not in the school 🏫

I will publish the videos twist perday, usually, Sunday and Saturday so subscribe to my RU-vid channel so that you won't miss any videos 💯💯💯💯

MATH WITH RAJAN
Olympiad mathematics | indian math
3:07
Месяц назад
Комментарии
@hulumtuesi63
@hulumtuesi63 4 дня назад
Who lied to you that 99% would fail and how can this question be an olympiads question when it is exyremely easy, I did it mentally without a pen, a piece of paper or calculator.
@lourdesgracia6767
@lourdesgracia6767 21 день назад
3(81^x) = 6 81^x = (6/3) = 2 log 2 / log 81 = 0.157732438 81^ 0.157732438 = 1.999999997 1.999999997 x 3 = 5.999999999
@Psykolord1989
@Psykolord1989 22 дня назад
Before watching: This will go most easily if we square away the radicals on the left. Recall that a^(mn) = (a^m)^n. First, square the left and the right, to get 3sqrt(9 sqrt(27)) = 81^(6x) = 3^(24x) (because 3^4=81) Squaring again we get (3^2)(9)sqrt(27) = 81 sqrt(27)= 81^(12x) And with one last squaring... (81^2)(27) = 81^(24x). Since 81 = 3^4, 27 = 3^3, and (a^m)(a^n) = a^(m+n)... (3^4)^2 * 3^3 = (3^4)^(24x) -> 3^11 = 3^(96x). Then 11 = 96x, and finally x = 11/96
@brucedavis9191
@brucedavis9191 27 дней назад
Go away
@sureshkumar-db1jh
@sureshkumar-db1jh 29 дней назад
C
@User19rhx13xr
@User19rhx13xr Месяц назад
7/16 in mind
@monroeclewis1973
@monroeclewis1973 Месяц назад
Rather than squaring expressions I converted them to exponential form right away: On the left 3^1/2 x 9^1/4 x 27^1/8, all powers of 3; on the right 3^12x. Add exponents on the left to get 11/8 with 12x on the right. X = 11/96.
@Ayushmishra70817
@Ayushmishra70817 Месяц назад
😂😂😂😂
@rajanmaths5
@rajanmaths5 Месяц назад
Nice
@Ayushmishra70817
@Ayushmishra70817 Месяц назад
@@rajanmaths5 aur kya haal hai bro??
@roger7341
@roger7341 Месяц назад
Substitute a=b+1/2. (b+1/2)^4-(b-1/2)^4=2[4b^3(1/2)+4b(1/8)]=0 b^3+b/4=0. b=0 or b=±i/2. a=1/2 or (1±i)/2
@mariorueda6715
@mariorueda6715 Месяц назад
the right answer is 262143
@phishfearme2
@phishfearme2 Месяц назад
what a waste of time
@joaocardoso2304
@joaocardoso2304 Месяц назад
Mate, you are among the 99% who got it wrong.
@TeenyPort
@TeenyPort Месяц назад
0:10 111111111111111111 but in base 2
@DonkeyYote
@DonkeyYote Месяц назад
I don't get it. Why not say 262144 - 1 ? If you are going to take the step that 512 is 2 to the ninth, why not say that 2 to the eighteenth is 262144 ?
@FritzTheCat_1030
@FritzTheCat_1030 Месяц назад
This is super-stupid. If you know that 2^9 is 512, you could just do 512^2 - 1...factoring it into (512+1)(512-1) is the single dumbest way you could go about solving from there. But then you do a whole bunch of other time-wasting after.
@TomasGradin
@TomasGradin Месяц назад
...and end up with the wrong answer 🤔
@timur5788
@timur5788 Месяц назад
oxymoron
@Time12366
@Time12366 Месяц назад
Just do multiplication by 2 manually lol
@marcelopacheco2479
@marcelopacheco2479 Месяц назад
2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536,131072,262144 (2^18) So 262143.
@proffessorclueless
@proffessorclueless Месяц назад
This won't work for anybody that can't multiply by 2.
@marcelopacheco2479
@marcelopacheco2479 Месяц назад
@@proffessorclueless Just multiply 1024 x 256 -1. Simpler than all rearrangement. I know power of 2 up to 20 by heart (plus 2^24 and 2^32) as a low level computer guy.
@proffessorclueless
@proffessorclueless Месяц назад
@@marcelopacheco2479 sounds like binary is the way to go here.
@jerrypaquette5470
@jerrypaquette5470 Месяц назад
It really is not that difficult toto just multiply 511 x 513 which equals 262,143.
@petercoool
@petercoool Месяц назад
Yes😂😂😂😂
@GabrieleTafuro
@GabrieleTafuro Месяц назад
I am afraid that the final sum is wrong.
@jerrypaquette5470
@jerrypaquette5470 Месяц назад
Your right it should be 262,143.
@honeybee9455
@honeybee9455 Месяц назад
X=0
@workemail9020
@workemail9020 Месяц назад
ITNA LAMBA Q KIYA? 4^8/8^4 - 8^4/4^8 can also be written as 64*64*16/64*64 - 64*64/64*64*16 sare 64 cut jayenge, simple bachega 16 - 1/16 = (265-1)16 =255/16
@WalkerGR221
@WalkerGR221 Месяц назад
The easiest solution is to put everything in powers of 2. You then have 2^2^8 / 2^3^4 - 2^3^4 / 2^2^8 = 2^16/2^12 - 2^12/2^16 = 2^4 - 1/2^4 = 16 - 1/16 = 255/16.
@Victurf
@Victurf Месяц назад
45 = 3^3.465...rien de plus simple
@despa7726
@despa7726 Месяц назад
sqrt(10 * sqrt(10 * sqrt(10))) = 100^x (10 * (10 * 10^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/2) = 10^2x 10 * (10 * 10^(1/2))^(1/2) = 10^4x 100 * 10 * 10^(1/2)) = 10^8x 10 000 * 100 * 10 = 10^16x 10 000 000 = 10^16x 10^7 = 10^16x 7 = 16x 7/16 = x x = 7/16 = 0,4375
@ForumLight
@ForumLight Месяц назад
He wastes time on several steps. 3^x = 45 can immediately be re-written as log_3 (45) = x. We're not required to use log base 10 to eventually get to this step.
@whosit112
@whosit112 Месяц назад
Dividing by 2 at the beginning was unnecessary.
@tommymorrison6478
@tommymorrison6478 Месяц назад
If 99% of entrants failed this they never learned arithmetic.
@JohnRandomness105
@JohnRandomness105 Месяц назад
2 *sqrt(x) = x. One solution is zero. For the other, divide by sqrt(x) to get 2 = sqrt(x). That means x = 4, the other solution.
Месяц назад
I don't believe 99% would fail to find the 0 solution. You wouldn't clickbait, would you?
@legendarylegodude11
@legendarylegodude11 Месяц назад
I literally just looked at it and knew 3⁴ + 3² = 90. You REALLY overcomplicated it
@sunillohia6003
@sunillohia6003 Месяц назад
Nearby value?
@sunillohia6003
@sunillohia6003 Месяц назад
Can any suggest what is value of x? In rational
@vpsjdon
@vpsjdon Месяц назад
Didn't watch the video but I got x=3.465
@allinthemind7364
@allinthemind7364 Месяц назад
3²+3⁴=90, but answer is 9×5+9×5=45+45=90 because we have to so how much we can remember and show that why 3×3×3×3+×3×3 is 90 Which we never use in our life. I am not telling that math and science is useless be this this 💀😕 education system crush it and fuck it
@charlesmrader
@charlesmrader Месяц назад
3^x=45, 3^(x-2)=5, (x-2) log 3 = log 5, x=2+(log 5)/(log 3). If 99% failed this, the population had never learned about logarithms.
@manomaybangali
@manomaybangali Месяц назад
easy toh hai😂😂
@chrismcgowan3938
@chrismcgowan3938 Месяц назад
x=4 and possibly imaginary values
@JohnRandomness105
@JohnRandomness105 Месяц назад
No, no imaginary answers. But zero is also a solution.
@chrismcgowan3938
@chrismcgowan3938 Месяц назад
@@JohnRandomness105 Yes I missed that one.
@MikeRosoftJH
@MikeRosoftJH Месяц назад
If we divide by √x, we get 2=√x i.e. x=4. But the equation has one more solution (when division is invalid): x=0. (If x is negative, then √x is imaginary. More generally, if x is complex other than a positive real number, then angle of √x in polar coordinates can't be the same as the angle of x.) We can also substitute y=√x; then we get y^2 - 2*y = 0, and that yields y*(y-2)=0, immediately giving the two solutions (a quadratic equation can't have more than two solutions).
@sebastiandomagala9233
@sebastiandomagala9233 Месяц назад
Nice calculating. But how on earth are you writing the letter "x"?
@FinetalPies
@FinetalPies Месяц назад
I think they're using n, same concept.
@sebastiandomagala9233
@sebastiandomagala9233 Месяц назад
@@FinetalPies The Thumbnail says "x", and "n" implies a natural number.
@golddddus
@golddddus Месяц назад
1:27 x^3 + x^2 + x - 555 = 0👀 1 1 1 -155 Syntetic division 5 5 30 155 1 6 31 0 x^2 + 6x + 31=0 D1=(b/2)2-ac=3^2-1*31 < 0
@marciodasilvamelo7241
@marciodasilvamelo7241 Месяц назад
Acho que está errado essa resolução.
@nishadhpatel5965
@nishadhpatel5965 Месяц назад
Isn't that not simple 7+49+343+2401+16807 = 19607
@FFH.
@FFH. Месяц назад
25
@harishvarbt3989
@harishvarbt3989 Месяц назад
B 25
@ajayff6539
@ajayff6539 Месяц назад
❤❤❤
@blackandbluesmurf6294
@blackandbluesmurf6294 Месяц назад
Silly soundtrack. Left after 20 seconds
@havali_doritos
@havali_doritos Месяц назад
Oh wow thank you
@ujjwalakulshreshtha9665
@ujjwalakulshreshtha9665 Месяц назад
Hahaha
@adib3011
@adib3011 Месяц назад
Isn't that just a simple sum of gp?
@shawnjacob6108
@shawnjacob6108 Месяц назад
The final result would still have 7 raised to 5
@soniamariadasilveira7003
@soniamariadasilveira7003 Месяц назад
Muito legal!