Hold up, William does got a point on 3:53 . Let him cook.. like a person's isnt suppose to be in an animatronic's mouth. Let alone a springlock animatronic and considering the fact that it can be triggered by liquid such as water, tear drop from C.C can count.
@@thatcrazyb0y885 Yes but he knew about the springlocks at least, plus on the other hand he has been warned by William multiple times. Its either that or he was just blinded by hatred or jealously, or the "I think C.c didnt save Elizabeth so i gotta bully him for revenge type situation"
I don't think CC would ever resort to William for help no matter the circumstance. (Edit: What is even happening lol. Please give up the arguing, I have no idea how we got to arguing when I simply stated my opinion. It is fine that you don't agree with me, but I wasn't trying to push it on other people so pls don't attack me anymore)
The nerve of Michael trying to blame William for Evan's death when he was the one that put his head there. William is a monster, but don't blame him for stuff he didn't do.
@@Silhouettexxx- William can't be held responsible when someone does something he can't predict with the animatronics. The only thing he or any employee of Fazbear's Diner can be liable for is that they didn't intervene when the tormentors brought Evan on to stage. He probably didn't predict someone putting another person's head into Fredbear's mouth, especially his own son when Michael should have known how dangerous the machines can be. Hell, two employees died to those specific suits. He can be held responsible for Circus Baby since he built the Funtimes with that intention.
@@moosefromsky3986 yeah okay I agree that was a bit dumb of me but other then that the theories might be true like he knew about the prank, pulled the plug on cc etc etc