This is a bit pink coloured. Here in Israel Golda's legacy is somehow tainted by the failures of her cabinet in the Yom Hakipourim war. She was so partly involved in the poor treatment that Jews from Arab countries received when they came to Israel, reading her biography it seems to me that in her mind Jews were Yiddish speaking Ashkenazim. The cabinet she belonged to really thought that the incoming Jews from Arabic countries were unsofisticated and politically conservative, which could challenge the hegemony of the Labor party. Also, Ben Gurion never said that Golda was the only man in her cabinet. But we should remember she was instrumental in founding this country. I also love her approach to feminism, instead of this toxic thing nowadays passes for feminism.
This school is everything she doesn't like, people of different races and religions living together. The true nightmare of all tribal nationalists, whether white, black, oriental or Jewish.
unfortunately many youth in other western countries are coming together as cheerleaders for the very terrorists who would toss them off of a roof in a heartbeat..."Chickens for KFC." Reality checks at Israel's borders and within Israel itself keeps our youth away from that sort of brainwashing and folly...
Told Israelis offered peace and it was rejected. Like someone coming and offering me $100,000.00 for my house worth $800,000.00. Then they come again and offer $150,000.00 and then again $175,000.00. Would you sell them your house that is worth $800,000.00 for $175,000.00? I think not!'
Your comment is lacking historical and factual foundation! Israel did not offer peace for something that belonged to the Arabs, and the Arabs did not reject it because of it. The Arabs rejected dozen times that they were offered peace because of Jew hatred and because they wanted to annihilate the Jews presence in the land of Israel. Jews have continued presence in the land for over 3500 years. The fairy tales of Jews taking land from Palestinians has no foundation in reality! in the 1920's until 1948 there were both Jews and Arabs in the British mandate of "Palestine" which was the land that covered today's Israel and Jordan. Jews and Arabs had "Palestinian" passports from the British rule. There was never such a nation as "Palestine" of indigenous Palestinian people - It was a lie that was spread by Yaser Arafat in 1964 when he started to call the Arabs living in the area "Palestinians". There was a land that was called Palestine, but never Palestinian nation! It is very easy to prove it, because there is no historical record of such a nation existing, no earlier Palestinian leader before Arafat, no currency, no capital, nothing! Just an invention of lie to slander Israel and give people reason to hate Jews. So your analogy is lacking any foundation!
Thank you Eden Golan, our amazing ambassador all over the world, angelic and moving singing in the abductees' square, continue to sing and influence the leadership of Israel and the world to return the abductees and stop this crazy war. Thank you Eden, you are a champion and a hero, we love you💙💜💗💓💖💝❤💜
What can I say? 😢❤ No words. Unimaginable. 🥲🎗 Bring them back home now! Eden Golan, You are incredible, and I stand firmly stand with You and the people of Israel. You are in my heart always. ❤🇬🇧🇮🇱🎗
Hits deep in the soul and captures the essence of our beloved Israeli citizen soldiers who only fight to keep us safe and safeguard our only tiny sliver of land. Love from Chicago 🇮🇱✡️💪❤️❤️
And then their are the funny looking gentlemen who dress in black suits and funny hats who by their choice of attire are trying to make their couple of hundred years old fashion sense chic and who refuse to conscript in the zionist army by their rapidly rising rate in numbers.
Have a look at the current middle east. Iran ofcourse is ruled by khamenei and iran is very much visible in iraq now. Same goes for syria. Then their is hizbollah in lebanon. Hamas and islamic jihad in palestine. Houthis in yemen. Numerical superiority of shiites in bahrain. Sizable population in eastern province in saudi arabia as well. A strong presence of shiites in pakistan as well. Sorry for mentiong fatmiyon and zenaboyn militas comprising of afghan and pakistani shiites respectively. Khoemini was a true visionary and has successfully through his vision changed the middle east. A true rockstar.
Do you really consider Iran theocrasy as doing any good to the world?! Iran through its proxies spread violence and destruction in the middle east and the world. Just observe the countries in which Iran meddled: Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen...people there are suffering and the countries are destroyed! Even within Iran innocent civilians are exposed day by day to rigid control and hardship, they hang people from cranes for almost nothing, Iranian people live in fear, the economy is collapsing there is hardship everywhere in Iran, but the government of Iran instead of taking care of their own citizens, they spend billions of dollars in providing arms to other countries. When you say that Khoemini was true visionary" I don't know if you were joking or really serious, as what is happening in Iran is very sad, and the same in Lebanon Syria Iraq and Yemen where Iran brought only sufferings and destructions. And in contrast see the countries that have peace and cooperation with Israel: United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco - these countries are doing well!
@@joeyo6385Dear sir, what you are not willing to give the slightest mention in your reply is what khoemini replaced. It was the ex shah of Iran who himself was the second generation of a cossack military officer but was delusional enough to celebrate a very lavish function in the supposedly 2500 years of king rule. His family is still not working and is living off the money embezzled by them from Iran. His son as you have graciously forgotten to mention visited Israel as a court jester recently. Now I must mention that the children of khoemini live a very normal life, they work and their children work as well and so also the children of khamenei as well. You have willfully forgotten to remember the late Mohammad Mossadegh, the late prime minister of Iran much before Khoemini who was deposed by the CIA and shah was brought back. You have also forgotten to remember that Israel had a very healthy relationship with the ex Shah so yes my dear sir, theocracy is indeed a very healthy option when compared with the ex Shah of Iran.All of the middle eastern countries you graciously mentioned have kings ruling them with not an iota of the western concept of democracy yet you praise them. They are nothing but American stooges. An easier way for you to accept what the middle eastern public really thinks is for you to immediately obtain a visa and go to the oldest peace makers with Israel, Egypt, Jordan or the oldest one which is turkey, wear a kippa in public and I will be very amused to hear from you of what happened next provided you lived to tell the story. Khoemini rocks , millions agree throughout the world, it's about time that you answer a simple question. Why do people don't like Jews in general since ages. To put a bit of humor in, a certain Mr William Shakespeare was by no manner a khoemini follower or a Shiite but he did write a play merchant of Venice didn't he?? I'm thankful to you to read my reply and apologize for any heart burning if any.
What is meant is to liberate the indigenous people of the land who are being ruled by the last colonial power of the world, israel in theory is the second crusader state. Since zionists claim as some sort of a divine right to own it and supposedly 2000 years waiting for the opportunity yet they categorically deem it morally wrong for the indigenous population to resist occupation. While haganah, lethi, palmach, irgun did what they did and all of it is documentd and almost all the founding fathers of it were terorists at some point in their lives yet it is only hamas and the likes who are to blame. Funny when no mention of the ex shah of iran is done but the leadership of a popular uprising is maligned. Last but not least funny aspect is that the zionist talking lives in the united states which if my memory serves me right was colonised by the anglo saxons from the indigenous population. It is with remarkable hypocrisy that somebody living in a colonized land is supporting and lecturing about not resisting zionist occupation. Bravo
There are many assumptions and misconceptions in what you wrote. The narrative of Palestinians as indigenous to the land is completely wrong and unsupported by historical records and archeological findings. Instead of holding on to false concepts I suggest that you educate yourself about the history of the land. Until 1967 the West Bank was ruled by Jordan, and Gaza strip was ruled by Egypt - until 1967 no one even had the idea to create a nation called 'Palestine' for the Arabs that started to call themselves "Palestinians". But from 1964 started the concept that there were "Palestinians" indigenous to the land and that Israel is the colonizer that took it from them. This concept was started in 1964 by Yasser Arafat (Egyptian born) who started to call Arabs in the area "Palestinians". and although there is not a single historical or archeological fact to support this claim, it has been used until today in order to slander Israel and Jews, and this is while there is ample evidence both historical and archeological as well as literature and culture that prove that Israel is and was the land of the Jews. I suggest that you get squinted with real facts and history, start with: 10 basic facts about the Israeli Palestinian conflict: www.huffpost.com/entry/ten-basic-facts-about-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict_b_5a417601e4b0df0de8b066a2 then: Palestinian historical land claims are unfounded: www.weeklyblitz.net/oped/palestinian-historical-land-claims-are-unfounded/ and also: How did the Muslims become Palestinians: www.quora.com/How-DID-MUSLIMS-SUDDENLY-become-PALESTINANS-after-2-000-YEARS/answer/Joseph-Shellim And if after all this you still think that there was this imaginary Palestinian nation of only indigenous Palestinian people, see if you can answer any of the following questions to support your claim: 1. When was the state of Palestine found, and by whom? 2. What were its borders? 3. What was its capital? 4. What were its main cities? 5. Name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat? 6. What was the language of the country of 'Palestine'? 7. What was the prevalent religion in the ancient country of 'Palestine'? 8. What was the name of its currency? 9. Choose any date in history and tell what was the exchange rate of the 'Palestine' monetary unit against the US Dollar, German Mark, GB Pound, Japanese Yen, or Chinese Yuan on that date? 10. Since there is no such country of Palestinian today what caused its demise and when did it occur? 11. Why did the Palestinians never tried to become independent prior to the devastating defeat of the Arab counties in 1967 Six Day War? 12. If the West Bank land (which prior to 1967 was ruled by Jordan) AND the Gaza strip (which was ruled by Egypt) were lands that belonged to the imaginary country called Palestine, then why the ""Palestinians"" living in these areas prior to 1967 did not demand their own land and independence from Jordan and Egypt. And you know the answer...
@@joeyo6385To cut a long story short, Zionist jew in general started toa mass immigrate to palestinel to supposedly claim a divine right to it. Haganah, lethi, irgun, palmach and their members all of whom are the founding members of Israel started an armed struggle which most of the world regard as terrorism but you my dear sir have failed to entirely mention in your reply. It is true that Zionists won the military aspect of the conflict but it is beyond comprehension as to why the displaced indigenous population should stop the struggle to get their homeland back. While all Jews have the right of return the indigenous displaced population should abandon their claim of the right of return. Dear sir, Zionists all over the world will be exposed to consequences of the Israeli experiment and their is little the Israeli government can do about it. While Iran exerts and expands it's influence in the middle east, the kings of Arabs face backlash from their population from the freely available images of the genocide of the Palestinians which will make it much harder or if I may use the word impossible from them to maintain any relationship with Israel. And then their is a growing number of the extremely religious Jews which we see dressed in black who don't want to serve militarily to Israel and are probably the fastest growing denomination coupled with the Arab population. So it seems that for all the Zionist aspirations, it is only a matter of time be it a few generations when the second crusader state will meet a logical end. I'm by the way a Shiite living in Pakistan, culturally religious but am amused to see the vision of khoemini prosper in practice long after he is gone. Interesting man, don't you agree???
