IF THE BIN LID IS NOT CLOSED WHEN THE TRUCK GETS THERE JUST EMPTY IT, IT OBVIOUSLY FULL AND THE RESIDENT DOES NOT NEED A OVER FULL BIN FOR ANOTHER WEEK OT TWO, AND IF THE BIN IS NOT OUT SO BE IT, IT MIGHT BE EMPTY, WHY PUT AN EMPTY BIN OUT
If the charcoal fumes are so toxic then why are we saturating our food with it. The stuff isn’t dangerous because poison - just dangerous because the embers stay hot for days
Why do they ask bike users to indicate a turn when they move towards the center of the lane they occupy? With 1.5m minimum distance (2m outside cities) including the side mirrors, any car would need to properly change lanes to overtake a bike just like overtaking a motorcycle.
@godooffme7747 I find it strange that you are admitting that you can't deal with vehicles travelling different speeds, you don't sound like a very competent driver. Do you have a licence at all?
It’s been proven that sharrows are not safe for cyclists. It’s a short cut to make it appear as that you’re building cycle infrastructure. It seems like you’re using this as an excuse to put speed bumps on residential streets where they are not needed.
It's to encourage cyclists to take the centre of the lane, something they can already do and should be doing. But yes, it changes nothing and isn't cycle infrastructure
@godooffme7747 OK now I'm certain you don't know how to drive. Road positioning is something you learn early on when learning to drive and it applies to cars just as much as it does to cyclists.
@@xaiano794 cyclists shouldn't be on the road, and definitely shouldn't be in the middle where it's harder to overtake them I know for certain you don't have a license, otherwise you wouldn't defend cyclists being on the road.
@godooffme7747 I'm a professional driver and have been for many years, if you struggle to safely pass a cyclist then you aren't a competent driver, period. Any competent driver knows that cyclists are easy to negotiate exactly because they travel slowly, it means that the time taken to pass them is short, the joke is that people like you who are not competent drivers constantly campaign to take cyclists off roads and put them in cars, more cars to hold you up, more cars to cause more traffic, to delay your journeys. It's kind of comical that you're such an incompetent driver that you would actually want to cause more traffic.
Why do you think that? I have never been stuck behind a bike for more than 60s before I could safely pass, I've been held up by cats for far, far longer than that. I mean do you really struggle to pass bicycles? Is that something you find extremely difficult?
@@xaiano794 what are you even talking about? You realize that there are women driving that refuse to pass anything, ever? And most cities in Europe are badly designed so there is no place to overtake a car inside the city. Bikes create long lines of traffic, usually don't know the road rules because they can't even get a car license, and their speed and weight is closer to a pedestrian.
Why is a Clearway even considered. The option I want doesn't exist. The staff are yet again being devious with this consultation process as their objective is pushing for a Clear way as it's the cheapest option. Having made a submission on the motorway in the words of Council staff they will "sweat the assets" . As usual this road has been broken up in sections. It's all about "meeting obligations not what is successful outcome for the Community! The bus T 2 option should be from Bealey Ave to the roundabout on Cranford Street. You want to get traffic down there should be a congestion charge at peak ours and make Buses and T2 lane a priority over single occupancy cars. I have ZERO faith in the traffic planning in the city! Especially with the staff hiding the safety audit as a draft of Cranford Street cycle lane the staff DID NOT follow the recommendations of the safety Auditor I tabled this "Draft" at a Community Board meeting only for the Board not to be aware of this report. I said it warranted immediate attention. That was on the Board Meeting on the Thursday a person was seriously injured out side the Service Station on the cycle lane. With the injured cyclist take away by Ambulance! At the Board meeting I asked to speak to staff about this. I am still waiting ! So I find the staff disingenuous with using safety to push the staff agenda for clear-ways to quickly clear traffic!
@@saifraeef they don't accept people for jobs that there are enough locals to do already. Train to be a doctor in your current country and you'll be able to move there
challenging new phase conning ratepayers into forking out more and more for the pointless pachyderm when ticket sales tank at $200 prices Im surprised the foozeballers dont plan to charge them appearance money
If you ever leave your house, you’ll find that referring to one of our official languages as “silly” is incredibly out of touch. We’ve grown as a nation to respect and love our heritage. You don’t have to partake, but it’s pointless getting upset about it.
It's all going very well even though the council is ticketing hard workers cars for parking close to site, a great way to motivate workers to keep on schedule
Looks good. If you can keep it on budget and on time I suggest local and central government get a full briefing as to how this was achieved. This would be the first large project I know about which did not have to move to variation clauses within the contract. Fixed price contracts represent a very brave move by contractors. Fingers crossed!
I can't wait to attend future events held at the new stadium 🔥🔥 rather than having to pay heaps for accommodation/flights etc to go to Auckland all the time! Yay lol
A "White Elephant" which the majority of Christchurch ratepayers did not want. Globally Rugby is a dying sport so the CCC thought fit to build a stadium at huge cost and overspend. Total madness and a complete waste of money from the outset. It will never make money for the next 25 years. Thanks very much CCC.
Come on, you dont have to be a fan of it. And the way its being funded by CCC is irresponsible. But its a lie to say the majority of people didnt want it. It had the most public submissions of anything in CCC history and was like 83% in favour. Obviously that doesnt mean that 83% of ratepayers support it but its a pretty overwhelming number
thanks for spending money on crap we dont want or need cathedral Mothballing...sports stadium next to the hospital..and a rugby stadium?? Nobody cares about Rugby...CCC should All be Sacked...throwing Money at rubbish...
The cathedral isnt funded by the CCC (they gave a little bit of money way back, but the vast majority of the funds come from the Anglican organization) Hospitals are not something that the council can fund. Assuming you are complaining that we are getting this instead of a bigger hospital or something. It does sound like you are saying that the new hospital infrastructure is a waste of money too which is asinine.
