Like so many other presenters, you seem to think that you need a repetitive, i.e. irritating, sound track competing with your voice in order for voice to be heard.
@SteveWalterPhoto It is not my intention to offend you, but I am subscribed, my Like is number 994 and I have activated the bell to receive all notifications. You're a Photographer, The One and Only. I hope to learn and enjoy every moment with you. From a very far away land, my greetings to you and your family in this new year. Happy New Year Mr. #SteveWalterPhoto, may 2024 come to you with Prosperity, Peace, Love, Abundance, Health and may all your wishes and desires become reality. Truly Yours. Just. Fabian
Why does it not work. I topklasse about 1000 pictures at a scocer match. After work takes long time, and when I saw this I just this is great. Tanks for the video
Just keep in mind that those settings in apply image only works perfectly for 16 bit images. If you do this on a 8 bit image, you will see some shift in exposure and contrast.
Hello Stewe. I watched Heart Oliver's frequency separation 2.0 video and I was wondering if it's possible to download the action he uses. If so, could you tell me where to download it from? Thank you very much. Regards!
Hi Steve. My name is Jorge. I am a Photographer and I live in the city of Rosario, in Argentina. I want to congratulate you and thank you. Congratulations on your way of explaining concepts that were very difficult for me to understand. This is, without a doubt, the best video I've seen (and I've seen many) on Frequency Separation. You are an excellent teacher. And I want to thank you for your generosity in sharing your knowledge. Today I discovered this channel and I already subscribe and I will study your videos. Thank you so much!!! receive a cordial greeting from me. Jorge (George) (My English is not very good and I use Google translate. Sorry! 😅)
Thank you so much for breaking this concept down for some of us new to photography. Like many others I saw videos on the topic but no one explained it as detailed as you did sir. Thanks a bunch.
Sorry for what I am about to say ... nevertheless, I simply do not understand why in the world you took SO long to muscle through a complex "technique", that through my eyes ... made no difference to the completed edited image from the way it looked at the very beginning of the video. What is the "fix" that was achieved? What was the "enhancement" that was achieved? What difference did all that work make, whether 8 bit OR 16 bit. I've watched this twice through and see no reason for the effort. It appears that the image looks exactly the same when finished, as it did before anything was done. Similar to this comment.
@Jay Sigal Frequency separation is a means to an end, not the end result in itself. The difference is that once you've separated the color information from the texture information, you can edit the color of something in your photo without losing any of the texture, and you can edit or remove some texture without affecting the color.
Loved that you mentioned preserving her birthmarks. I really don't like those plastic, robotic post that shows a person without any marks. It's boring, uninspired and kinda disrespectful with the subject.
Hey! Thanks for the feedback. As I’m sure you’re familiar, there are multiple ways to achieve similar results in photoshop. Those markers in the case were, in fact, useful. Please do share a link to the video you’ve made using the difference blend mode. For sure I’d love to see it. Cheers!
