My mission is to provide analysis for all levels of the rugby community by making it accessible and understandable whilst helping players and coaches improve performance.
Wondering if there's anything you can do to avoid this. Even if done subtly it causes a whole defense disruption around the ruck in a play that's just on orange/red ground. It reminds me of that 2022 try from Australia vs South Africa tugging the player to not be able to drift and playing an inside ball through that channel. Although the worse of this match was the referee calling throws not straight from the Scrum twice to Fiji to Kuruvoli, and then when the All Blacks scrum half did the same Kuruvoli was asking the referee why did he allow the AB player to play it that way but decided to penalize him...
What worries me is it seems like the only way to truly create space is if a player is out of position or if you do things like this at the ruck (which everyone does) or legalised obstruction like Ireland does. If oppurtunities can only be created at the margins of the law then maybe the laws aren't fit for purpose
Thank you for providing the not so obvious tactics of the sly side of rugby, to those who are interested to keep learning. For someone who has been out of the game for 50 years, it can get confusing, as to what is and isn’t happening. Something that never changes is that the AB’s will always know how to extend the rules just beyond the limits, without getting penalised. Obviously they used to have Richie to drag even more of that into the game. It’s not that the AB’s always play better rugby, it’s just that they are very sly, and that allows them to capitalise on that, along with their allotted portion of 3 forward passes per match. Fortunately it only rugby.🤪 I’m aware as to how many Kiwis tend to loose their sense of humour about such things, but please be assured, I am only taking the piss, with my fingers crossed.
🤣🤣 If you aren't playing, you aren't competing. Stop with the salty tears as EVERYONE is trying to push the rules...and this one isnt even marginal or dodgy or even slightly edgy 🤣🤣
@@boswellwhanau Pardon me for daring to comment on your wonder boys who must not be commented on. It trust you will all continue to live up you’re own little goldfish bowl. 🤣 In my English sense of irony, I am aware of the way the game is played on the edge of the rules, it’s just that everyone knew as to how Richie was always in the ref’s face, and that obviously effected the game. He wasn’t silly. If I was the ref, I’d have given him a Yellow at the toss of the coin.😂
The pot calling the Kettle black 😂 England's tactic of tackling the ball carrier regardless of ball in play or transferred on is to take him out of the equation thereby reducing the probabilities
The final and real problem here is that the English winger hovers around the wrong side of the contact area, doing nothing, and only responds when Telea has the ball.
you would have to be stupid to not drive away from the touch line. Otherwise it naturally drives towards the touch line as english players flood across. Its the only way to create space for your winger in this situation.
In strict interpretation, Perofeta did not bind onto Barrett but hit Steward in front of Barrett, therefore coming in from the side, so should be a penalty to England for offside. The All Blacks rucking technique was superior to England in this instance as Barrett was in a lower straighter body position than Itoje, whose waist was bent more.
Stretching the law to its limits? The 14 was out of position, the flanker guard dog was out of position, due to good rucking Talea was provided with a cake walk. You don't understand Rugby
@@ContactCoach so is a burglar that doesn’t get caught. Porter was effective too, but what he was doing was illegal. In your thinking were Ryan and Doris nearly effective trying to help their team ? They nearly ruined a player’s leg but the team would have benefited from it. Philosophy questions are hard
Yggyttttttttttt tyt in the morning and I was just wondering if you were able to get the money for me or anything 8.30pm or not I can do it for you to get the 2 out 327 33 and I will be there for the rest and I have the best in mind for you to be a good person and you have a 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂😂
The "on the limit" block on 12 saves it, I feel like without it 12 would still have managed to cover the space and therefore 13 drift to cover the "pop" pass that breaks the line. The play is good thought and the only reason they had to block the 12 is because the initial blocker play by england 12 was slightly early letting Russel partially slide on Care instead of letting 12 deal with it entirely on his own. But a great use of the dynamism of Earl with this play as he's quicker than most back rowers he can manage to interest Russel where with a slower 8 he wouldn't manage to run past scotland's back row
Une combinaison d'une simplicité biblique ! Mais si complexe à exécuter... Bravo à l'Angleterre pour l'avoir réussie et à Contact Coach pour nous l'avoir détaillé et décortiqué ! It’s a tactical system of biblical simplicity! But so complex to execute... Congratulations to England for having succeeded and to Contact Coach for having detailed and dissected it!
Une combinaison d'une simplicité biblique ! Mais si complexe à exécuter... Bravo à l'Angleterre pour l'avoir réussie et à Contact Coach pour nous l'avoir détaillé et décortiqué ! It’s a tactical system of biblical simplicity! But so complex to execute... Congratulations to England for having succeeded and to Contact Coach for having detailed and dissected it!
A lot of debate. As soon as the ref say's 'no try' then the protocols dictate it must be 100% conclusive. I think all watching probably know the ball was grounded but the protocols in this instance dictate that the try cannot be given. Rough one for Scotland in my opinion but I can see why it was not given.
On voit aussi le travail défensif de Fickou censé couvrir les extérieurs en reculant et en glissant pour éviter d'être débordé mais les passes après contacts sur des joueurs comme le 9 qui a pris de l'avance sur l'action fait la différence. Normalement, c'est Bielle-Biarey qui monte en pointe et Fickou qui chasse au cas où mais ils ont choisi une défense glissé et pas une rush défense car il y avait déjà surnombre. Dur de défendre sur des pertes de balles
@@philippevcg9098 Il y a aussi juste à la droite d'Alldritt, Atonio qui préfère prendre légèrement en retard Finn Russell pour l'éliminer alors qu'il aurait pu se décaler d'un cran...
@adamjohnsalmon607 Impulsive,comment based on emotion....which means Ireland have something...otherwise it wouldn't be worth saying anything if they were crap. Playing style and skill set was probably what was being referred to
@@Zz-lm1no Not impulsive or emotional, I'm half Irish anyways, not even a kiwi, it's just a cold hard fact. If Ireland did "have something" maybe they would've actually progressed further in the cup last time round.
@@AjaySalmon Yeah, you are so right, they are obviously really a crap team, just keep getting lucky wins, lost 1 in the last 19, I mean talk about sub standard
@@readesiun988 until they stop being jinxed by the 4 southern teams each time they are in a position to be the best in europe they will continue to be a B tier team. Juani Hernandez and Imhoff cursed you for at least 1 more rwc bracket.
What's most surprising about this is not that Ireland do this successfully. It's that it must be incredibly difficult to master, otherwise everyone would be doing similarly.
It is very difficult and skills must be at a premium. It's been in Ireland's DNA for a while now and the familiarity with their players playing regularly together helps.
@@c58crtde I'm not disagreeing with your point but have you ever watched chess masters play?! It does not look direct, or simple. I'm a moderately good chess player (1700 elo), and I'm just baffled watching 2200+ games.
Superbe, bravo à l'Irlande. We, French, we have a rocky road to cross to find a better place where we can rebuild a common story... Congrats and Erin go Bragh!
