These were the articles of the heavenly tabernacle. The smoking furnace is the altar of incense and the burning lamp is the seven candle stick menorah which God will in the future show to Moses. Abraham saw the articles of the heavenly tabernacle bfor Moses
Merere is his Alter_ Abraham and his Hirim..You do know that the 440 , haa bought them out, i haven't friends that are Litgitment isrealites...No disrespect their free now!!!! My question is why only a few came out of iraq...and why are so many up set about them being their own state and building their Units now?!
I have questioned the meaning of the two items passing through the half animals in a covenant for 20 years. This actually is the clearest definition and the easiest to apply. Thank you!!!
Actually he is right. Even in babylon they were thrown in a fiery furnace. I don't know why someone is telling him to wake and understand? He already is awake and understands.
The Woman is the body of Christ. The manchild is the Bride of Christ. There is a picture of the Bride of Christ in Genesis 24. Abraham is a picture of God the Father. Isaac/God the son (Jesus). Abraham's servant/Holy Spirit. Rebekah/bride of Christ. The Canaanites/the unsaved world. Abraham/my country and kindred/Christians (Gen. 24:4) is the main harvest (10 virgins).
The woman is the main harvest of the church. Revelation 12:5 (the manchild) is the 1st fruits/144,000/bride of christ, They are caught up before the time of trial (Revelation 3:10). Rev 12:5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. Overcomers will rule with a rod of iron just as Jesus will. Revelation 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: Revelation_2:27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. There is a picture of the bride of christ in Genisis 24. Gen. 24. Abraham is a picture of God the father. Isaac/God the son (Jesus).Abraham's servant/Holy Spirit. Rebekah/bride of Christ. The Canaanites/the unsaved world. Abraham/my country and kindred/Christians (Gen. 24:4) is the main harvest (10 virgins).
FAR from it's literal interpretations! Hasten to my callings: LET this be the sign of your preaching: That a literal woman will rise to power first in America and will bring about the sorrow of many hearts that was spoken off in the book of Daniel and of Zephaniah, and in the Book of Genesis; it was made known through the LAW of MOSES: SHE is ALIKYAWA that is to come to bring back those who have done wrong to judgement and to make things new and make things right!
Burning Furnace (Burnt Sacrifice) Christ Jesus. Flaming Torch Holy Spirit. Salvation. THE COVENANT OF YHWH. This is The Gospel, sir. Wake. Pray to understand scripture. Bless you.
Ah this is interesting. I had always assumed that the woman was the Christian church because we are referred to as Christ's bride in other scriptures, but Israel makes much more sense.
Reasons why Galatians 6:16 *does not mean* the Church replaced Israel. Replacement Theology is the false idea that all of the promises that God has given to the nation of Israel have been transferred to the Church, and God is now finished with the nation of Israel, and now his program has moved completely to the Church, and Israel has been permanently cut off. Number One: Context. Context. Context. What is Galatians 6 about? Paul was addressing the problem that confronted the Galatians by the Judaizers (Jews). These false teachers believed that to live by grace and in freedom meant to live a lawless and degenerate life. So in the final chapters of the letter, Paul made clear that justification-an act of grace through faith-need not result in a sinful lifestyle. Because Christians have been freed from bondage to the sin. Galatians 6 winds down with a reminder to carry each other’s burdens and to test one’s own actions. Paul advises that we will reap whatever we sow in life. If we sow to the flesh, then we will reap accordingly. If we sow to the Spirit then we will reap eternal life. Has *zero* to do with introducing a sweeping new doctrine that the Church replaced Israel. I could stop here, but I’ll continue. Number Two: The Double Preposition. Galatians 6:16 reads “And all who will follow this rule, peace and mercy be *UPON* them, and *UPON* the Israel of God.” How many prepositions are there? How many times does the prepositional word “Upon” appear? That preposition appears twice. Why is there a double preposition here? Because there’s two groups: the Church AND Jewish Christians. Paul in no sense is connecting them as a single entity. Number Three: Galatians 6 is a letter. The phrase “Israel of God” appears at the conclusion of the letter. In Galatians 6:16 Paul is offering a *benediction.* It’s conclusion. What do you do in the conclusion of a letter? Introduce a sweeping new doctrine? No, you’re just signing off. It’s not logical that Paul would introduce a new doctrinal system in the conclusion of a letter. Most people believe the book of Galatians has three parts to it. If Paul was going to introduce something as sweeping as the Church is the new Israel, that the church has permanently replaced Israel in God’s program, we would not expect him to do it at the end of chapter 6. We would expect him to do it in chapters 3 and 4. For example, look at Ephesians. When Paul handles doctrine in Ephesians, he does it all in chapters 1-3. In chapters 4-6 he’s just applying the doctrinal concepts. Another example is how Paul structures Romans. All the doctrine he wants to introduce, he does it in chapters 1-11. Then in chapters 12-16, he applies doctrinal concepts. It’s the same with the book of Galatians. You can’t expect high Christian living until you first lay the doctrinal foundation. This is what Paul does in all his letters, including Galatians. So, if Paul was going to introduce something as sweeping as the Church has replaced Israel, you wouldn’t expect him to do it at the conclusion of a letter Number Four: Paul could have made this so much easier by not saying the word and/Kai. In that case, it would have been completely unambiguous what Paul was talking about. If Paul just eliminated the word “and” verse 16 would read like this: “And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and *mercy, upon the Israel of God.”* But Paul didn’t do that. Number Five: When Paul says THEM and then THE ISRAEL OF GOD, he’s distinguishing two groups. So does Paul follow this pattern elsewhere? Yep. Galatians 6:15 “For in Christ Jesus neither *CIRCUMCISION* availeth anything, nor *UNCIRCUMCISION,* but a new creature.” Notice the two groups: circumcision and uncircumcision. He has a habit of pointing out two groups. Paul did the same thing in Galatians 2:7-8 “But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the *UNCIRCUMCISION* was committed unto me, as the gospel of the *CIRCUMCISION* was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the CIRCUMCISION, the same was mighty in me toward the GENTILES)” See, Peter was the apostle for Israel (circumcised) and Paul toward the Gentiles (uncircumcised) TWO GROUPS. Some immediately go to Galatians 3:28 *“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”* Does it say For we are all one IN THE CHURCH?? No. All One IN CHRIST in terms of our position. In the church you can still have Jew and Greek. So a female that becomes a Christian doesn’t stop being a female. Like a Jew who becomes a Christian doesn’t stop being a Jew. Just like a slave back at that time, did not stop being a slave once they were Christian. Stop twisting this verse to mean there is one group when this verse isn’t even talking about that. Replacement Theology views Biblical text from a bias. We call it an A-Millennial, exegetical bias. They’re looking at the text through a preordained lens. So it’s theological assumptions determining exegetical conclusions. Don’t fall into this trap. Paul said in Romans 11:1 Has God forsaken His people? Heaven forbid no! Paul was an Israelite. Chapters 33-41 of Ezekiel prophesy that Israel will be restored and become believers in Christ *in the last days.* When you define what the 7-year tribulation is and its purpose, it puts that period of time in context. It's an old, Old Testament prophecy for Daniel's people - Jews/Israel from Daniel 9:24 and 27. They will go through the time of Gods wrath to purify them. The church is not appointed to Gods wrath (1 Thessalonians 5:9) The Church is literally rescued from it- 1 Thessalonians 1:10. God Bless! #WeFlySoon 🎺🎺🎺✝🕎
@@HarpazoReady2022 What am I late on? I'm not a bot - not that I know what that is exactly. My name is Bobbie and I live in Alabama. I'm 63 years old and have a son and two grandchildren. Don't get too offended that I called dispensationalism mumbo jumbo. If you just study the Bible without the lens of dispensationalism, you would see things much differently.
So it looks like you are saying there are two different Gospels, two different peoples of God and if I had to guess, two separate kingdoms, and two different "women" of God, the wife of God (Israel) and the Bride of Christ (the Church). What a perversion of the Word of God this is! There has only ever been ONE people of God. ONE way of salvation. ONE kingdom of God/Christ for all the elect throughout history. God isn't a racist. He doesn't care about one's ethnicity. And yes, Galatians 3:28 does apply. And so does the following verse: Galatians 3:29 "And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise." Then there is this: One in Christ - Ephesians 2:11-21 "11 Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called “the uncircumcision” by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands- 12 remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 14 For he himself is our peace, who has MADE US BOTH ONE and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility 15 by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, 16 and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. 17 And he came and preached peace to you who were far off (GENTILES) and peace to those who were near (JEWS). 18 For through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. 19 So then you are no longer strangers and aliens,[d] but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, 21 in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord." MAY GOD DELIVER YOU FROM THE HERETICAL FALSE DOCTRINE OF DISPENSATIONALISM.
@@ChildofAbrahambyFaith Nobody anywhere said anything about two gospels except *you.* That’s what your false doctrine of demons says. The Bible shows there is *only One Way to salvation,* but God has different ways of dealing with groups of people that bring them to that saving faith. God has a plan for Israel to bring her to faith in the last days. The Bible teaches that in the last days Israel will accept Jesus as their Messiah. They’ve never believed, but one day they will. Gentiles were grafted into the tree Israel was already part of. We already accept Jesus as the King and will be raptured out before the 7-year tribulation that will bring Israel and many others to faith in Christ. One way. One salvation. One Messiah. That’s what Galatians 6 explains. Two groups of people: the circumcised (Jews) and the uncircumcised (Gentiles). As both groups walk according to the ONE RULE of salvation by faith alone. 🎚️
The man child is the son of The Christ born in 2017. The true prodiagal son of God. Adam and King David and now God's Christ. He is risen. Revelation 3:21
Is it true that tertulians view of the trinity is not quite the same as the way the church sees it today? I seem to remember reading his writing on it and it was a little different✝️⚔️
Hi Lawrence, thank you for watching. To learn more about Steve's views, check out his website which has topical lectures: www.thenarrowpath.com/topical_lectures.php The series on the Kingdom of God may be of interest to you. To talk to Steve directly, he has a daily call in radio program, you can learn more about that on his website as well. May God guide you as you study His word my friend.
@@biblequestions We can only go back to the greatest Timeline in the Bible; From Genesis to to the end of Revelation...The last day of the 6000 years age of earth is year 2022 in inclusive time reckoning..2022 is also the First Day when the age of earth is 7000 years old...Daniels book is with specific number of years but Revelation is time no longer but with events related....And God Rested on the 7th Day...God will Rest from the messy affairs of Humanity...He will put a Conclusion to the Plan of Salvation....Revelation 18: 8 is the Fine prints...and Then Famine of 7 years world wide is the Final Tribulation..
Those are some interesting thoughts. If you'd like to hear other idea's about the end times, Steve has a collection of lectures call "When shall these things be" that covers many views, you can listen to them here: www.thenarrowpath.com/topical_lectures.php#When_Shall_These_Things_Be
Of course it is - There is absolutely nothing mysterious about Biblical "tongues" - when referring to something spoken, they are nothing more than real, rational language(s); usually unknown to those listening to them, but always known by the speaker(s) - it’s their native language. In contrast, the “tongues” Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians are producing today is an entirely self-created phenomenon. It is non-cognitive non-language utterance; random free vocalization based upon a subset of the existing underlying sounds (called phonemes) of the speaker’s native language, and any other language(s) the speaker may be familiar with or have had contact with. It is, in part, typically characterized by repetitive syllables, plays on sound patterns and over-simplification of syllable structure. It is also interesting to note that any disallowed sound combinations, i.e. consonant clusters, in the speaker’s native language are also disallowed in his/her tongues-speech. Further, this subset of phonemes typically contains only those sounds which are easiest to produce physiologically. There is absolutely _nothing_ that “tongues-speakers” are producing that cannot easily be explained in linguistic terms. Conversely, when it comes to something spoken, there are absolutely no Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s), though it may not be the explanation you want to hear, and it may be one which is radically different from what you believe, or were taught. “Praying in the Spirit” does _not_ refer to the words one is saying. Rather, it refers to how one is praying. In the three places it is used (Corinthians, Ephesians, and Jude), there is absolutely zero reference to 'languages' in connection with this phrase. “Praying in the Spirit” should be understood as praying in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. In Pentecostal/Charismatic parlance however, the phase has come to be equated with modern “tongues”, i.e. when one “prays in the Spirit”, one is typically engaged in some form of tongues-speech. The word “tongue(s)” itself is simply a more archaic word for (real) “language(s)”, nothing more. Replace “tongue(s)” with “language(s)” in these various passages and the whole modern Pentecostal/Charismatic concept of “tongues” begins to become difficult to posit - “language(s)” sounds a lot less mysterious, and in many cases, adds more clarity to the text. Again, in Pentecostal/Charismatic parlance however, the word has come to be equated with the modern concept of “tongues-speech”. “Tongues” is to some Christian believers a very real and spiritually meaningful experience but consisting of emotional release via non-linguistic ‘free vocalizations’ at best; non-cognitive non language utterance - the subconscious playing with sounds to create what is perceived and interpreted as actual, meaningful speech. In _some_ cases, I would argue that it is clearly a self/mass delusion prompted by such a strong desire to “experience God” that one creates that experience via “tongues”. Known by many different names, “tongues”, or more accurately “glossolalia” or non-cognitive non-language utterance (NC-NLU), is practiced by many cultures and religious beliefs from literally all over the world; it is relatively new to Christianity and certainly not unique to it.
