I love FreeIPA, it took all the things we previously set up manually and individually, then added more and made it a breeze to setup. Shame that changing over to it where I work now would be too disruptive due to the DNS stuff but I would recommend it for any company’s IT infrastructure.
took me 7.5 hours to get it running today 😂 most of that was trying to get podman to run the container... ended up realising we were gonna use it with docker-compose anyway so switched to docker and got it working
I think macros are only a problem for cdef(). It can be specified manually with function and variable names used by the testcases. Or maybe in some cases, it would be possible to strip macros from the files
This is a really cool idea... i think it'd get your unit tests done really quickly. I don't really do much C any more and most modern languages have testing built in. Some of the C programmers I know though, well their "religion" forbids the use of Python and I'd love too see their faces when you suggest they "pollute" their C codebase with something as "unclean" as Python. ;)
Great idea, how about functions like malloc() which are also used by CPython? Would it be possible to replace them? Well I guess I'll have to try it myself.
On page 48 of Make Your Own Neural Network in the diagram of the NN, why does neuron 2 in layer 1 connect with all 3 neurons in layer 2 and the other neurons in layer 1 connect with only 2 neurons in layer 2? He uses the same diagram in his presentation.
the way guy trained his fingers is excellent! So much typing.... instead of handy GUI 😆 Serious, why all this fapping in a command line?? People already invent GRAPHICS DISPLAY, use it, Luke! :)
I am grateful for this video, because otherwise James Bennett would not have told what are the drawbacks of this solution. I saw its partial usage in the codebase of my colleague and also tried it in my own pet-project, but it becomes just too heavy to keep consistent in the long run. The idea of James Bennett with implementing it in QuerySets and Managers sounds much more reasonable right now for me. But till this video, I didn't know where to put the business logic and did not know about manager/queryset opportunities.
IMHO fat models underrated. Django's ORM is a kind of Active Record. If fat models cannot handle the complexity of business logic in your specific applications, it may means that the Django itself is not suited for your app, especially Active Record ORM. In that case better to choose other framework with other orm approach such as Data Mapper...
Well, I dont know. I prefer to have a Singleton in a constructor instead of leveraging a language property of Python that module is a Singleton. Constructor seems to be more generic and intuitive. If more Pythonic means "utilize every possible quirk of the language" then I am not on board with that.
Great, I'm trying it out, but I wish it would compile a little faster! # I'm using Ccache, but... Can't you make a library (binary) for each Python module to reduce compile time?
"if you use that in your daily life, this presentation won't add many things to you" Well, I use it in my daily life but god knows I don't know anything. 😂😂
And why would i need this? I don't get it, i have autocompletion and syntax highlighting in my IDE, why do i need autocomplete in the terminal? I came here because i thought IPython is a wrapper around python that helps creating CLI applications
