Most of our thoughts on culture and feminism come directly from western sources. Feminustani, by journalist Sabahat Zakariya, is an attempt at a local Pakistani lens on things, at the same time taking conversations on Pakistani popular culture from the realm of PR to Criticism.
If you care for this content and want more of it please consider becoming a patron. Anything from $1-100 counts. www.patreon.com/feminustani
I think world is moving on from this narcissistic mindset and emptiness. It has given us nothing but wars over resources and hunger. Following the path of Creator is the only solution. You are not important in the universe I’m sorry. You are nothing! When you consider yourself important (with yolo mindset) you please yourself even at the expense of other’s suffering. Cuz hey, there is no hell to punish you. Great example of that is Isreal with 60% atheist population surprisingly. The most racist the most blood thirsty state in the world.
thank you! so helpful. 'keeping your attention span local' you are probably the only person who said it in the entire discourse about palestine WHILE continuing to be empathetic towards Palestine. Both are extremely important.
interestingly, after becoming an atheist, I felt a lot more humble. for once, i am able to look at mortality in the eye because I am not scared of hell fire. i feel personally responsible for destroying nature, because i don't feel k dunya faani hai/test ki jagah hai/end of times ki sign from God etc. I can wear second hand clothes because 'halal paisay ko enjoy karna jaaiz hai' wali philosophy laikar nahi chal rahi, i am a better wife because i am not obsessed with husband duties in Islam and 'his money is my money' wali soch. I feel like I can be an adult ready to see myself as a morally grey and forever work in progress, unlike the absolutism that Islam offered...
omg how unique are your videos. probably the only person/vlog that helps me make sense in this particular way. this is the kind of things I keep thinking all the time but no one to discuss these with.. thank you!
Sorry Madam aap ki kisi bhi baat main koi khas wazan nahin hay ye sub batain aik illusion ko zinda rakhnay kay liay buhut achee husakti hain magar haqeeqat say door hain.
Facing imminent death or poor health, atheists become believers ! Founder of Game Theory John von Neumann, when dying of cancer in the hospital, sought the ministrations of a Catholic priest.
Nietzsche's philosophy is a much better alternative to religion. And it's much more empathetic contrary to the popular ill informed belief regarding his philosophy.
You counted so many good things religion brings but you didn’t count the bad things ! You should look at the most religious counties ie Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, KSA, India etc and compare them with the most secular countries like China, Japan, Sweden, UK, Norway etc.
Mere khayal se mazahib ko historically tor pr dekhna, un ke urooj o zawaal ko smghna aur un ki sari achai buraion ko achi trha smghne se hi hum mazahib se age brh ske ge. New atheist trha ke ideas zabani tuo sahi lgte hein pr un ke logo pr munfi asrat hi zada hote aur isi lie wo rw ke sath ja milte hein. Atheism or atheist hone me new atheism ki koi gunjaish nahi. Kisi ke apne deeply personal spiritual beliefs pr hamla krna aur un ko kmtr dikhane ki koshish krne ka koi faida nahi he ulta nuqsan he
3:15 religious dunya mei bhi yehi poocha jata hai ke "aap karte kya hain?" aur bilkul secular dunya ki tarah ussi basis par treat kiya jaata hai. do you seriously think religion cures societies of class divide?
Behtreen as always! And plesse bring more book reviews for us. I know it is no easy task to put together such mindful and articulate content. A huge fan👏🏻👏🏻
One young woman's cover of a wonderful song, in which she is seeking the right kind of man ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DGMflSHRxFY.html She found him, and she replies to him with another cover: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LoIE8RDPKqk.html This man: 1. The general, 'masculine' cosmos and the special, 'feminine' Earth (Gen 1:1); 2. The Earth, as its own general subject, and its special kind of material wealth: its abiding maximal abundance of open liquid water (v. 2); 3. That water, in general, and its cycling (the water cycle, vs. 3-10); 4. The water cycle, in general, and its beneficiaries: biological life (vs. 11-12); 5. Biological life, in general, and its special category, animal biology (vs. 20-25); 6. Animals, in general, and its special category, humans (vs. 26-29); 7. The general human and the special...woman (Genesis 2:7-25). This pairing sequence is itself paired with the fact there are ONLY FIVE names that Genesis 1 reports that God gives to five things. And, these things seem to be the Earth's own prime three dynamic, feminine subsystems of its water cycle: 1. the thermally regulative day/night cycle ('day' and 'night', v. 5); 2. the thermally regulative atmosphere (special, home-centric sky, 'shamayim', as in Gen 1:8 and Gen 2:4b - NOT 'ha-shamayim', phenomenologically general sky, as in Gen 1:1 and Gen 2:4a); 3. the land/sea surface thermal exchange system ('earth' and 'seas', v. 10). If these three sets of things are what these verses are reporting, then it finds analogy in Adam's later naming Woman (Genesis 2:23). ((( I think she, likewise, names him ))). For, these things are the Earth's own basic, feminine subsystems for handling the Sun's radiation for benefit of life on Earth. This is why Genesis 1 says that God saw that the light (v. 3) was good. For the 'light' is in the prior context of the Earth and its wealth of water. It is not (repeat, not) physical light unto itself that God called good. It is the relation which the light has for the potential for water-based life on Earth. For, tellingly, the Genesis 1 account does not report that God names gravity, or light unto itself, or even water. Only of day-and-night, as such, and the atmosphere, and of land and sea. These are: (i) of continual regular rotation of the Earth, which moderates that 'directional' radiation for all parts of the Earth (Gen 1:4-5); (ii) the Earth's atmosphere, which further moderates that radiation to the surface (Gen 1:6-8); (iii) the continual thermal exchange of land and sea, which constitutes the thermal moderating system of Earth's thermally binary surface (Gen 1: 9-10). - - - Imagine we had no experience of any world like the ecological Earth. Imagine we did not know what is a dew-touched field of grass in the morning. Or 'night', 'daytime', or 'morning'. No sunsets. No plants or animals. No 'starry nights' as seen from the grass of such a world. Instead, all we knew were things such as 'hot balls of fire' seen from inside a Star Trek-like star ship. No misty mornings seeing rays of the Sun shining between the trees. We could, of course, have all the 'synthesized' food we could want. But that would be only by way of the toil and expertise of maintaining such 'glorious' technology. We also would not have free air, free gravity, or free atmospheric pressure. Nor could we say, 'My darling, your eyes sparkle like dew in the morning'. And there would be no romance in likening our lover to a moon. We also could not let any of the ship's systems of life support go untended, lest we die, or, at least, deeply suffer until we got it working well again. We would have all the 'synthesized' food we could want. But only by way of the toil and expertise of maintaining such 'glorious' technology. And, we would not have free air, free gravity, or free atmospheric pressure either. We also could not say, 'My darling, your eyes sparkle like dew in the morning'. And there would be no romance in likening our lover to a moon and night. We also could not let any of the ship's systems of life support go untended, lest we die, or, at least, deeply suffer until we got it working well again. Could we even be properly human? We would not know of clouds, rain, or peaceful sea coasts. Instead, we would be oppressed by mere bulkheads, and the ever-need to maintain energy shield generators against cosmic radiation. What a un-beautiful life it would be. The holo-deck will not show us a world of plants and animals and hills and rivers. So, for our not having ever known of a living world, what hope could we feel? And what would any hope we might feel be based upon? So, if someone were to tell us of such a world, how could we believe him? It would just be too fantastical, and too strange. But, back to reality for a moment: we actually know of such a world. So how do we think we objectively imagine that a Star Trek-like space ship is glorious? In its own terms, the ship is a hunk of junk, no matter how many kinds of food it synthesizes. It cannot produce even one living tree. And, we don't even know what a tree is. So our ship, though it can travel at 'warp speed', would only sap us of our more generous sense of humanity. For, for example, no must get even one day off from working to maintain the ship, so long as it needs our tending just for it to keep us both alive and well. Now imagine our ship has automatically taken us to the Earth, and lets us out onto this world. I think we would be far, far more awestruck at this ecological world than we could ever be by suddenly having a fully-functioning USS Enterprise. And, we would be awestruck every moment of every day for the rest of our lives. I was am inspired to write this, about four months ago, because of this girl: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0rG7r_PhBjA.html
Apke videos mujhe bahut achhe lagte hai apke bolne ka tarika aur knowledge bahut achhi hai love you mam from india🇮🇳 isse pahle Duare channel par dekhta tha apka show
Aaj ki duniya me har koi Atheist hai ,kyuki kisi ko khuda se bhagwan se Darr nahi lagta logo ko bas mauka milne ki baat h jaise hi mauka Mila kuchh fayde wala to Maulana aur pandit bhi atheist ban jayenge ye sachai h aaj ke jamane ki
Islam is the True Religion.For eternal life prosperity must embrace Islam. No GOD but Only 1 Allah and Muhammad (peace be upon him)is the Last prophet (Messanger) of Allah (God). The Holy Quran is the Last and Greatest Book of God almighty. Thanks.
Ek hota hai majhab ko manana Aur ek hota hai Ishwer ko manana Ishwer ke aage ham khud ko jhukate hai tab hame ye ahsas ho ki ham jo bhi kaam karte hai uske liye hame Shakti kaha se milti hai Matlab hamara apne aaap me koi existence nahi hai Majahab ko manna pahla step hai ishwer ko janane ka jisme
Botton is just another western writer with absolutely zero knowledge or regard for islamic, eastern and indian traditions. Whats worse is that these people are just riding the coat tails of internet sensations like jordan peterson and have nothing original to contribute.
What about jatiead in Hindu religion, what about different cults of Islam and Christianity lady do you know what are you talking about. All religions are man made garbage and anti humanity!
Atheism is also a belief, a different kind of religion. there are even Churches of Atheism. People may or may not believe in God but they all worship wealth and power, money and guns i.e.
