Hi this really give me a good idea for my vault but I don't know how to make tsak looking good as yours can you help me I am a new to obsidian and thanks for all
Wow, you've completely blown my mind. Nowadays, we can access numerous plugins and learn so much. However, the true value comes from explaining what you do and why you enjoy doing it. What you've explained was in my blind spot, not quite pinpointing what I wanted. Now, I clearly understand what I was yearning for. Thank you so much for sharing your excitement, and please continue to share.
Very interesting use of obsidian as a bujo. I'm not quite ready yet to digitize my bujo (I ended up with a paper bujo after failing with sooooo many digital options) but this is my far the most convincing idea to make a digital bujo.
For anyone watching, logseq has a better experience out of the box for precisely this, I still use obsidian tho. But if you like bujo you will love logseq
"Better" is subjective. I chose Obsidian because there are fewer knobs to twiddle and, for me, the experience is more straightforward. I have tried Logseq and it's nice and yeah, I think some people will definitely prefer it.
Do you have a Vault Template for this? and which plugins are enabling you for Icons. Thanks for sharing this, I was struggling moving away from a BuJo Paper notebook to Digital, even so I work in Tech ;)
Not a Vault template, but you can go get the individual templates in the gist link in the description. The AnuPpucin template does the icons and I think there are others that do it too (like Minimal). Good luck!
Rob, I have been following you for years. You have no idea how many people like me you must have helped over the years. I am also a big fan of Goggins and I keep a physical Bujo. It looks like I will be switching. The idea of being able to use Obsidian for this and have it available wherever I go on my phone is a big plus.
Excellent video thank you - I read the imposters handbook many years ago and was brought here from your email. One question is how can this workflow fit into professional compliance contexts? Generally developers can install anything on employers machines but data leaving corporate networks is a touchy compliance area. E.g. a professional engineer may encounter a lot of moments you touched upon whilst sat in front of work machines.
I probably wouldn't recommend that if data compliance is a thing. Journal's like this are supposed to be "private", if you will, so I would probably stick with whatever notes tool they allow.
Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video, I was very curious about your workflow when you mentioned it in your last email and this did not disappoint. Now I need to hurry up to finish the book that I am currently reading so I can finally start your new Roadmap book.
@@TimRubel In the video I'm working on the file locally, but if I needed to get this up to a remote server, say at Digital Ocean, then I would probably secure copy (scp) or use a client like Transmit. The easiest thing, to me, would be to create a local database as I'm doing, then dump the SQL when I'm done and send that to a remote server. What else?
Hi Rob, Amazing video on Full Text Search on Postgresql (I am pretty new to postgresql butI have experience on other SQL engines). I am following the knowledge from you video, I will let you know if I could implement the FTS on my project. JB
This is incorrect. You changed the time being stored. If you have UTC in the database you need to always deal with it as UTC. If you were inserting records and specifying a time using the current time zone your code was wrong. Your SQL here changes the time that is stored in the row, so of course you get different results. If I store an int of 10 in one row and 10 minus 4 in another, those are different values. Look at your insert ststements, you are specifying an explicit time as a string without specifying the time zone! Your inserts are the problem / bad code. It has nothing to do with how the column is configured.
Time is always stored as UTC Postgres, no matter what you do. It's only when you ask for it in a query that it is projected, by default, to the system's date and time settings. Conversion would be impossible otherwise. The docs are clear on this: "All timezone-aware dates and times are stored internally in UTC. They are converted to local time in the zone specified by the TimeZone configuration parameter before being displayed to the client". Have a read here: www.postgresql.org/docs/16/datatype-datetime.html
@@rconery It doesn't matter how it is stored internally. You seem to be missing something. If you can't see the problem from your inserts I don't know how better to explain it. You misunderstand what is going on and you're saying it is one thing when it is not.
@@Me__Myself__and__I Let's try it this way: when you insert a date/time in Postgres, it's automatically converted to UTC and stored as such. A time zone is attached based on your DB's time zone setting (which is UTC if it's any cloud service) or, if you attach a time zone, it's stored with that. The literal value stored on disk is *always* UTC. I think I'm pretty clear on this, and it's not just my opinion, this is verbatim in the docs. There is still a ton of room for confusion, thus the video. I'm OK being wrong, any time, but you're going to have to do better than "if you can't see it...".
@@rconery I started to type out a really long response. Then just to be certain I went and had a chat with ChatGPT to make sure I'm not crazy. it validated in a couple different ways what I said (resulting in about 5-6 pages of output). The jist is if you're handling your dates & times properly the timestamp vs timestamptz isn't going to make a difference. The exact same date & time gets stored & returned using default behavior if you're feeding in bare dates & times without time zone. If you want to discuss further I suggest you have a lengthy chat with ChatGPT.
I'm leaving this here in case I forget to, this is the best knowledge resource I've came across in my career. Even after my 4 years of college, I never thought there'd be so much to learn which even a college degree didn't had in store, thank you for writing this, Rob!
That was amazing, I didn't even realize that something like this is possible this video definitely goes to "bookmarks" for future reference , thank you very much.
Really interesting video. The first thing that crossed my mind is to relegate responsibility to the backend, it blows my mind that you could have that kind of logic in postgres.
The vue cli is not the same as Vite though, right? At about 3:00, you say you're showing off how fast "vite" is, but when you show the package.json and how you created the project, it looks like you're using the Vue CLI. Now, when you're working in the Nuxt app at the end, that does seem like Vite - it says it plainly in the logs. Was "this is how fast Vite is" at about the 3:00 timestamp just misspoken?
Cool video! I'm currently working on a method that locks the password field of protected archived files like zip 7z rar. So basically, even if the correct password is uncovered with tools like Hashcat, the password field will still report that the password is invalid. The user needs to provide a BOM-key to reactivate the password box, In order for the initial password to work. I call this method BOMsec which stands for Byte Order Manipulation Security. I am currently not aware of any RE method or tool that is able to crack a randomly manipulated sequence of bytes. When all testing is complete I'll provide a iink for humans to try and smash the zip cotents open. Because AI at this point struggles to comprehend my method and ranks it as unethical,.... not kidding... Will soon be in touch... LM
I am overwhelmed. Not the best at SQL at all. How'd you learn all this? If you could give a roadmap on learning Postgresql features like this from scratch it would be great if you could share. Time to watch this video 20 times until I get it.
Its good but in real world cases its not practically reliable because when the columns has integers, float we can no add them bcz we can't perform sum on string types.
You can always cast a numeric (or any) type on the fly if you want but I think my best advice would be to 1) watch the whole video and 2) put some years under your belt and realize WTF ETL is.