The reason why I studied in UD from Bavaria coming, where the roots of liberal conservatism and related traditions exist and not the new world woke order which arises in Germany and also in US.
This is just the beginning of the ideology. The powers behind this are flooding the nation with immigrants to create a dependent class, intentionally depressing the economic structures to institute control over thoughts and words, indoctrinating children into the movement with a religious ferver, and creating the conditions that will make this impossible to resist. They are sowing the seeds of genocide and calling it equity. We must call it out, expose exactly what it is and the tactics they are using, find and eliminate the donors facilitating this for personal gain and destroy the new Marxism before it can take root. The alternative is too disgusting to imagine.
54:40. 58:50 "The point of CRT is to make 'race' the central construct for understanding inequality" Gloria Ladson-Billings, Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education (1995)
CRT is just a demand for vastly increased racial preferences and redistribution. It must be fought. Remember: equal men are never free, and free men are never equal.
I graduated in 2013. I took am civ 2 with Dr. Hanssen. I learned nothing from her. I learned no actual history from her. And when I graduated and started actually reading history in my spare tome, I reflected back on my time with Dr Hanssen and honestly, reflecting back on that time and comparing it to what I know now, it made me extremely left wing.
@@sonjak8265 My point is I learned nothing of substance from Dr. Hanssen. And that her daily rants about 'grrrrr!!! progressives' that I 100% bought into when I was extremely conservative back in the day actually helped pushed me more left wing once I started learning the things she never taught. I loved my experience at UD. and my best professor was Jonathan Culp. That guy is amazing. But a lot of UD is unapologetically conservative to the point that UD's idea of 'a search of truth' I realized boiled down to 'here is what we think is truth, don't bother looking anywhere else'. Hell, I majored in politics and the ONLY time I had to read Marx to get my BA was in politics 101. Imagine getting a BA in a field saying 'you know this field of study' but the only time you read one of the most influential philosopher in the past 200 years (whether he was influential for good or ill) was for a week in a 101 class.
Me and my classmates (who were all very conservative at the time) all agreed that Hanssen's class wasn't actual history. We, as conservatives, did enjoy her rants but even then we realized she wasn't actually teaching history, just her pet theories. Hell one day she spent a lot of class time passing around her physical copy of sparknotes of The Education of Henry Adams that was all marked up to show us how she was totally right about the book and sparknotes was totally wrong. What a waste of a class period. She was just the conservative stereotype of liberal professors not actually teaching anything substantial but just pushing ideology through an extremely filtered lens. Except she was conservative not liberal.
@@sonjak8265 Rant aside, my point is Hanssen sucks at actually teaching Am Civ 2 when I took her class back in the day. Every class from her was just pseudointellectual bullshit that was simply Fox News talking points dressed up to sound academic to 20 year olds.
THANKS A MILLION FOR SHARING YOYR CATHOLIC INTERPRETATION OF THE JEWISH PHILOSOPHER. FOR MAIMONIDES FROM A JEWISH MYSTICAL PERCEPTION, THERE IS NOTHING IN CONFLICT WHATSOEVER FOR THE BELIEVER IN THE ONE GID, WHEREIN FEAR AND WONDER ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME CONCEPT, WHERE THE TWO MERGE INTO THE ETERNAL ONENESS, WHERE ALL CHARACTERISTICS OF GOD BECOME ONE, THE MAGISTRAL UNITY.
I watched a lot of football last year. I wasn't keeping track, but it seemed like most of the unsportsmanlike conduct penalties were being given to black players. So I googled it and came up with an article that said that the last 27 or so ejections from pro football games were of black players. Its conclusion from that was that referees were systemically racist. The possibility that those black players deserved to be ejected due to their behavior wasn't mentioned.
This term is just a new catch-all slur against liberals. It's utterly meaningless. It is more useful to think of it as a reflection of the biases and fears that so-called conservatives about people who reject their simplistic views. NOBODY uses this term who is a liberal. It's just a formulaic straw man that serves as a foil for shadow boxing goofballs who want to virtue signal about how reactionary they are. Quite frankly, I think anybody who seriously talks about it like it's some modern scourge is participating in a pathetic attempt at engineering a "crisis" that requires some fascist remedy
"anybody who...fascist remedy." Interesting take, cuz Conservatives think that's what CRT is all about: engineering a crisis by pretending that modern institutions are still racist and modern laws still discriminate and then introduce fascist remedies. Also, I've spoken with people who do use and prefer the word CRT, and I've even seen a local leader of Black Lives Matter use the word CRT (and wear a shirt with CRT written on it). Liberals definitely do use the term, despite what you might be reading on Buzzfeed. Talk with some actual liberals and you'll figure that out :)
