GEOCOAST aims to broadcast educational videos about Ireland's coastal and marine environments with particular focus on coastal geology and geomorphology. The GEOCOAST project has been initiated in 2012 with support from the INFOMAR programme www.infomar.ie/. This RU-vid channel is accompanied by the online Map Guide at www.coastalireland.com/geocoast/ allowing to select videos based on their locations.
It is hoped that through GEOCOAST videos we will make our contribution towards increasing people's awareness, understanding and appreciation of Ireland's coastal and marine environments.
If you wish to support GEOCOAST please get in touch via www.coastalireland.com
DISCLAIMER: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in our videos belong solely to the authors or presenters, and not necessarily represent the official views of the INFOMAR Programme, Marine Institute, Geological Survey Ireland, or the Government of Ireland.
I was in Ireland twice - arrived and left on a sailing vessel - never used a wheeled vehicle on this island so far I made it to Cobh so far, I have to come again!
I showed a rock to a Geologist in Kinnegad and it is 80,000017 years old. He told me this 17 years ago. I still have it in my shoe polish box. It's round with a pointy bit.
Scientists don't have a political agenda? Really? And who pays their endless researches? Isn't it the big industry they work for? The same who are indebted to big bankers? The same who funds the states (so if they work for the states they work in fine for the big bankers, so the public / private divide is purely a label). Why the global warming is a scam? www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ViY2J3LPgN4.html New sun-driven cooling period of Earth ‘not far off’ Former IPCC head of sea level measurement radio interview explains the complete absence of scientific driven information about accurately modeling global temperature for any accurate predictions, etc.
wonderfully informed narration, both my parents were from Cork ,my darling mother a child of Cobh, the tour of spike island in 2019 which i done with my son was and to my surprise a spiritual experience,, not so much from the military aspect but from a personal point of view to the pain of previous generations whose spirit never broken was surely tested, and i am so grateful to them and of course my parents for giving me something they never had. Thank you for this film
Would love more videos like this. Also I wonder if you'd be open to doing a guided tour / talk of Killiney beach for a group of 10 - 20 people? My email is breffnie@gmail.com
Interesting. Thx for you comment Maciej. A lot of what he is saying makes sense to me. But I can not get me head around this one (climate change is hoax). I wonder if he got back on this of that there is some more content from him on this?
Global warming is not hoax ... it's real... people who are saying its hoax is because they have money invested in oil ... oil plays a very large part in entire worlds enconmy .. countries like usa dubai UAE saudi Arabia russia ..... all these countries will collapse if nobody uses oil anymore .... all rich billionaire have trillions of investments in oil and that's why they are saying global warming is hoax ........the entire middle east is dependent on oil they dont have anything to sell but oil ..... so it's not hoax , you can see how fast the ice melting in Antarctica . Grow more trees and use solar energy . If billionaires loses oil they will become poor ... that's the thruth .
Scientists taught out of books controlled by the powers that be what eva u want to call them cult, 7 famlies they believe because they are scientists this is the truth its really called conditioning! Seriously there plan start well before his patronizing so called discovery of climate change its called fear which creates control which is the ultimate goal total gobal control
the climate is changing...the climate is changing, yes ok....and then he added, it's a our fault...well he lost me here....yes the climate is changing, but we have to be sure why and it is very hard to say...I bet we don't have any effect because of the CO2 emissions....a different topic is the pollution which I think we must work to avoid it at all cost....but is a different thing...completely different....something we can improve more and more.....but climate changing is way to difficult to understand..but my bet here is that we have little to do with it, and is just a politica trick to control the flow of the energy by a few people that have the power and think they are better than the common people....imposing on us their agenda of overthinking rotten soup.
The climate is warming. Science journals up to the late 1980s concluded it is caused by cyclic solar activity. As reported in Nature in 1999, studies from Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in England analyzing instrument measurements taken since 1868, concluded the sun's exterior magnetic field has increased by 230% since 1901 and by 40% since 1964. Then go and check out geologist Gregg Braden and his work on the ice core samples which prove the Earth has gone through these same heat cycles throughout history where the Earth heats up due to solar cycles then carbon increases following the heating. The heat comes first followed by the increased carbon. Not the other way around as we are being told by misinformed scientists today whose work is largely based on models. The starting principle of their model is based on wrong assumptions so that is why their conclusions are also wrong. It was accepted science that solar activity was causing the heating of the Earth up until the 1980s when the subject became politicised. (you can tax people for using too much carbon but not for what the Sun is doing!) There are few true scientists who really know what's going on.
Did anyone notice how John Brennan said he should chem trail (SAI) our atmosphere because of climate change, seems awfully fishy. Remember when the government lied to us to push an agenda? 🤔 Oh yeah that’s right wmds in Iraq... But scientist never lie they can’t possibly be influenced.... Meanwhile in climategate emails the scientist complain that the data is the high temperatures they wanted and that they needs new data 🤔. Remember when scientist lied about cigarettes being healthy... millions died of lung cancer because of it.
Serious question: how can scientist proof that climate change and ice melting is not just a natural change like it happen many times in the history of our planet?
Its all going to be ok.. been hearing this scary stuff 50 years now.. it's all a sell ev and tax the bejasus scam.. I ain't changing my diesel skoda for a Tesla soon..LET THE MILITARY STOP BLOWING THE PLANET UP.. electricity for your thumberg ELECTRIC CAR is produced by DIESEL GENERATORS..now that's GAS!😉
This is interesting. There is no doubt that human destruction of the biosphere is affecting the biosphere, e.g. polluted rivers, death of plant and animal species, but to say unequivocally that human destruction of the biosphere is causing the increase in global temperature is another matter, isn't it? Scientists' argument is that CO2 is causing heat from the sun to get trapped in Earth's atmosphere. I think another argument is that there is less vegetation on the surface of the planet to absorb and neutralize sunlight; this argument is directly related to human destruction. My gut feeling is to disagree with Icke on this matter, as much as I respect him. Saying this, I haven't done much research. What are your thoughts?
According to the Vostok Ice Core Records, CO2 level changes have followed Earth's overall temperature changes at an 800 year lag for the last 800,000 years. That means that our current CO2 levels are the result of Earth's overall temperature 800 years ago. World leaders have convinced their dependents that this works in the reverse order, relatively quickly, and that we are to blame, so that they can tax us out of a false shared guilt in order to be able to afford to "fight" climate change, an unstoppable natural cycle. The following is the source of this information: Historical Carbon Dioxide Record from the Vostok Ice Core Investigators J.-M. Barnola, D. Raynaud, C. Lorius Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l'Environnement, CNRS, BP96, 38402 Saint Martin d'Heres Cedex, France N.I. Barkov Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Beringa Street 38, 199397, St. Petersburg, Russia Period of Record 417,160 - 2,342 years BP Methods In January 1998, the collaborative ice-drilling project between Russia, the United States, and France at the Russian Vostok station in East Antarctica yielded the deepest ice core ever recovered, reaching a depth of 3,623 m (Petit et al. 1997, 1999). Ice cores are unique with their entrapped air inclusions enabling direct records of past changes in atmospheric trace-gas composition. Preliminary data indicate the Vostok ice-core record extends through four climate cycles, with ice slightly older than 400 kyr (Petit et al. 1997, 1999). Because air bubbles do not close at the surface of the ice sheet but only near the firn-ice transition (that is, at ~90 m below the surface at Vostok), the air extracted from the ice is younger than the surrounding ice (Barnola et al. 1991). Using semiempirical models of densification applied to past Vostok climate conditions, Barnola et al. (1991) reported that the age difference between air and ice may be ~6000 years during the coldest periods instead of ~4000 years, as previously assumed. Ice samples were cut with a bandsaw in a cold room (at about -15°C) as close as possible to the center of the core in order to avoid surface contamination (Barnola et al. 1983). Gas extraction and measurements were performed with the "Grenoble analytical setup," which involved crushing the ice sample (~40 g) under vacuum in a stainless-steel container without melting it, expanding the gas released during the crushing in a pre-evacuated sampling loop, and analyzing the CO2 concentrations by gas chromatography (Barnola et al. 1983). The analytical system, except for the stainless-steel container in which the ice was crushed, was calibrated for each ice sample measurement with a standard mixture of CO2 in nitrogen and oxygen. For further details on the experimental procedures and the dating of the successive ice layers at Vostok, see Barnola et al. (1987, 1991), Lorius et al. (1985), and Petit et al. (1999). Trends There is a close correlation between Antarctic temperature and atmospheric concentrations of CO2 (Barnola et al. 1987). The extension of the Vostok CO2 record shows that the main trends of CO2 are similar for each glacial cycle. Major transitions from the lowest to the highest values are associated with glacial-interglacial transitions. During these transitions, the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rises from 180 to 280-300 ppmv (Petit et al. 1999). The extension of the Vostok CO2 record shows the present-day levels of CO2 are unprecedented during the past 420 kyr. Pre-industrial Holocene levels (~280 ppmv) are found during all interglacials, with the highest values (~300 ppmv) found approximately 323 kyr BP. When the Vostok ice core data were compared with other ice core data (Delmas et al. 1980; Neftel et al. 1982) for the past 30,000 - 40,000 years, good agreement was found between the records: all show low CO2 values [~200 parts per million by volume (ppmv)] during the Last Glacial Maximum and increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations associated with the glacial-Holocene transition. According to Barnola et al. (1991) and Petit et al. (1999) these measurements indicate that, at the beginning of the deglaciations, the CO2 increase either was in phase or lagged by less than ~1000 years with respect to the Antarctic temperature, whereas it clearly lagged behind the temperature at the onset of the glaciations. References Barnola, J.-M., D. Raynaud, A. Neftel, and H. Oeschger. 1983. Comparison of CO2 measurements by two laboratories on air from bubbles in polar ice. Nature 303:410-13. Barnola, J.-M., D. Raynaud, Y.S. Korotkevich, and C. Lorius. 1987. Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2. Nature 329:408-14. Barnola, J.-M., P. Pimienta, D. Raynaud, and Y.S. Korotkevich. 1991. CO2-climate relationship as deduced from the Vostok ice core: A re-examination based on new measurements and on a re-evaluation of the air dating. Tellus 43(B):83- 90. Delmas, R.J., J.-M. Ascencio, and M. Legrand. 1980. Polar ice evidence that atmospheric CO2 20,000 yr BP was 50% of present. Nature 284:155-57. Jouzel, J., C. Lorius, J.R. Petit, C. Genthon, N.I. Barkov, V.M. Kotlyakov, and V.M. Petrov. 1987. Vostok ice core: A continuous isotopic temperature record over the last climatic cycle (160,000 years). Nature 329:403-8. Lorius, C., J. Jouzel, C. Ritz, L. Merlivat, N.I. Barkov, Y.S. Korotkevich, and V.M. Kotlyakov. 1985. A 150,000-year climatic record from Antarctic ice. Nature 316:591-96. Neftel, A., H. Oeschger, J. Schwander, B. Stauffer, and R. Zumbrunn. 1982. Ice core measurements give atmospheric CO2 content during the past 40,000 yr. Nature 295:220-23. Pepin, L., D. Raynaud, J.-M. Barnola, and M.F. Loutre. 2001. Hemispheric roles of climate forcings during glacial-interglacial transitions as deduced from the Vostok record and LLN-2D model experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research 106 (D23): 31,885-31,892. Petit, J.R., I. Basile, A. Leruyuet, D. Raynaud, C. Lorius, J. Jouzel, M. Stievenard, V.Y. Lipenkov, N.I. Barkov, B.B. Kudryashov, M. Davis, E. Saltzman, and V. Kotlyakov. 1997. Four climate cycles in Vostok ice core. Nature 387: 359-360. Petit, J.R., J. Jouzel, D. Raynaud, N.I. Barkov, J.-M. Barnola, I. Basile, M. Benders, J. Chappellaz, M. Davis, G. Delayque, M. Delmotte, V.M. Kotlyakov, M. Legrand, V.Y. Lipenkov, C. Lorius, L. Pépin, C. Ritz, E. Saltzman, and M. Stievenard. 1999. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399: 429-436. Raynaud, D., and J.-M. Barnola. 1985. An Antarctic ice core reveals atmospheric CO2 variations over the past few centuries. Nature 315:309-11. CITE AS: Barnola, J.-M., D. Raynaud, C. Lorius, and N.I. Barkov. 2003. Historical CO2 record from the Vostok ice core. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. Revised February 2003
It's kind of ironic that the global warming advocates who are supposed to be open to change (unlike conservatives &/or conspiracy theorists), wants the "climate change" that's currently happening halted because they're afraid of the changes it will have on biology, oceanic currents and plants, animals, mushrooms and whatnot (even vulcanism). So who is really afraid of change? Doesn't more people and wildlife die of cold than heat on our world? Doesn't other environmental problems like clean freshwater, toxins and chemicals spewed out from factory's/industry also give us reason to fundamentally "change our ways" to something better than capitalism, communism and consumerism? According to most real environmentalists big cities are a big no, no and impact the environment and less densely populated areas very negatively, but we've known this for over 40-50 years and still haven't begun to dismantle larger cities or dispersed population or given the countryside the financial resources they deserve in what they provide for the metropolitan centres in their respective countries. Global warming is a scam because there's simply no way the global fake elites are going to do away with "business as usual", unequal distribution of wealth/resources or big cities/metropolitans. Also is doesn't help that they buy their own scientists who produces outrageous reports and studies like the IPCC's have done & does.
Less solar activity equals weaker magnetic field on Earth which inturn let's more cosmic Ray's through that produce more alpha particles which bind water vaper creating more clouds that reflect more energy back to Earth. Also cosmic matter in the form of micro particles also bind water vaper creating clouds and because of Earth's constant movement through our galaxy, the quantity of cosmic matter will probably vary.
If the sea threatens to rise.... WHY DO BANKERS STILL INVEST BILLIONS OD DOLLARS IN REAL ESTATES PROJECTS AT COASTLINES ALL OVER THE WORLD. These Such lying deep evil people. People take a bucket of ice and put sone water in it too which covers the ice. Now let the ice melt and measure the rise. It’s exactly the same hight ;) They are liars people!
