whether things like language are innate, I think Locke would say, sure there are innate things like capacity to learn language, but that is not an example of an idea (although the idea we have about that capacity may be an idea, of course, but certainly that is not innate... the infant does not sit expecting to learn a language or pondering about it)
thanks, I just started reading Locke's Essay on Understanding, and all he talks about for whole chapters is these assumptions about innate ideas, without mentioning who were the champions of this innate ideas idea, the idea he was trying to disprove.
"If you read Hume, and you say 'Hume is boring', the problem is not with Hume, its with you. Hume is not boring." Hehe:) "Maybe" if had Einstein not read Hume, he would not have the curiosity and the courage to discover and contribute what he did. We are all some how inspired and influenced by others.
Yes. Read “Final Day” Richard D. Wiles. The Scofield Bible teaches there are 7 Dispensations (periods). The 7th and final era is the Millennial Kingdom; a J-ish controlled world. This is why they want to rebuild the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. That will usher in the Millennial Kingdom where “everyone else” are slaves.
Thank you so much. For your courage and letting people know about deception. It is so true the Lord said he will deceive the whole world. And the Lord said if you add or take away from anything in this book all these plagues in this book will come upon you.
After Biden 4years the US is no longer the most powerful nation, that is for sure!! We are now in a multi polar world whether people wake up to it - or keep on sleeping.
Scofield’s annotated Bible promotes dispensationalism which eventually led to hyphenated Christianity called Christian Zionism. MacArthur’s annotated Bible promotes cessationism. I know because I have both of these Bibles for reference. I once heard a Russian pastor say that all it takes is one drop of poison in a glass of pure water to kill you. You need discernment and the Holy Spirit to lead and guide you into all truth.
G.Grennell Absolutely correct! It took me twenty years to find out the truth that Dispensationalism and pre-trib rapture are false. Beware of any commentary Bibles or pastoral opinions. Check against scripture first.
I like your pre supposition... that if "one comes to the bible believing it is totally true... , more than likely...no one will convince you otherwise... but you DO realize that the opposite is true just as well?... that if "one comes to the bible believing it is NOT true...more than likely... no one will be able to convince you otherwise as well.... there fore... it appears this will ALWAY be an "impasse".. for many... I have resigned myself.. to try to avoid confrontations.. with those who prefer to "critique God's word.. rather than to embrace it.. and cherish it the time we are here on this earth... as 1 Timothy 2:16 states: But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
I much prefer Coppleston's history of Philosophy. I can't stand Bertrand Russel dogging so many of the philosophers who do not align with his modern views. Coppleston was a Catholic Priest, but he at least attempted to remain objective in his history.
That's fair but I personally quite like the critiques as many of the works I often only see praise for. An objective perspective is (likely - I can't say as I haven't read but am interested to) better at gaining an understanding of a specific historical philosophy if you have no prior knowledge, but a subjective take on works you already know I personally believe is a more refreshing and nuanced way to picture the history of philosophy
@@jakobreece Indeed It is refreshing to delve into Bertrand's History after having read enough philosophy to know when I disagree with something and to be pressed to think critically about it.
Thank you for this input. After being saved for over 32 years, I now see the wisdom in your message. Don't believe everything you hear or read, even in the Scofield Bible. Use discernment, prayer, and many sources, and then pray some more for understanding. I was saved in a Pentecostal Assembly of God, and many people read the Scofield Bible and took it as the Gospel. This is dangerous and not good. I have found that it is compartmentalized and coming from a certain view, as you say, and it is true. Reader, be aware. Don't just blindly follow the Scofiend or any reference blindly. Thank you!
Thank you for the video grandpa, about the point of every living was made from water, just think about it, can you live without water? you cant!. Even its mentioned in the holy quran '"made from water every living thing" {21:30} Like tell me if there is a plane, human, animal or even micro-living can life without water, there arent. I love love your vidoes ❤
Your opinions are just that.....opinions ! And not very profound nor researched . Your unsubstantiated babble surely doesn't " respect " the inte!licence of the listeners here
Any reader with half a brain understands it's the writers interpretation. They themselves will tell you to read and study God's word yourselves. You assume everyone is ignorant.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below? Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8, 3:16? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the RU-vid videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
Yes I would agree. We need to be like the Berean, making sure what is said is actually what the bible says. The problem is not many who hold to any particular view preach a clear gospel message like you said, the new covenant of grace is Jesus blood and his spirit leads us in truth. Most muddy the waters(sadly including Wilkerson I think). They muddy it with works as the means of entering or staying in the family of God. No man is going to have perfect doctrine but I think we should talk about such things and review if they are scriptural like you said. I do know the good news is that Christ Jesus, God in human flesh, died for all peoples sins and we have redemption through his blood. If we trust in him alone and that alone not ourselves we have Eternal Security in Christ. Ephesians 2:8-9 I would agree with anyone on that, If a liberal Christian changes that or what God expects of us as a eternally saved believer, by saying the bible has a mistake on that or it doesn't apply to us, I would disagree strongly. Dispensational, covenantal, I disagree with some points and agree with some. Lordship salvation, Arminian, anti nomian, calvinists, gnostic, liberals, most fundamentalists. I'd disagree with all of them. Most organized christian religion make a point to minimize the Gospel, that is sad.... I think we should just be what the early church were called, "people of the way, or people of the book". The book just tells us of the way, and the way Is Jesus plus nothing. John 14:6 Hope this find you well, brother!
Me parece muy buena su propuesta de que cada autor sea honesto y anuncie que su enseñanza es solo un punto de vista más en el vasto mar de interpretaciones, es muy académica su postura; sin embargo, eso no va a pasar, ya que cada autor está convencido de poseer la verdad, y más en terreno bíblico o religioso o político o filosófico; ni Platon, ni Aristóteles, ni los escépticos como Pirron, lo aceptarán: cada uno de estos pensadores postula que su forma de ver el mundo y su tabla de valores es la verdadera y el resto de las enseñanzas no. De seguir el punto de vista que ud propone no generarían discípulos o seguidores o no tendrían grey; las personas tienen la necesidad de que lo que reciben por enseñanza es la verdadera que su pastor les predica la única verdad, que el autor que leen es el correcto; porque de lo contrario para que ir a una iglesia donde el pastor tiene dudas de lo que cree, o leer un autor que no tiene la certeza de su forma de pensar. Eso lo que ud propone quizá suceda en alguna universidad, y aún así lo dudo, ya que cada universidad tiene una agenda, en los colegios prosiguen un interés propuesto por el secretario de educación del país donde pertenezca ese colegio o universidad, su currículo de estudio está diseñada por un punto ve vista que se autor tiene la osadía de afirmar que es el verdadero y los demás puntos de vista están equivocados Saludos y bendiciones desde la frontera norte de México PD: pero incluso ud por más crítico que se crea neutral tiene una agenda detrás de su opinión: el liberalismo
Well, well, well. Finally. I like how you presented Spinoza’s ideal hence your introduction to a Hegelian dialectical ideal falls neatly into place. However, “Nature or God”, does not explain either and so not all philosophers need to be guided by Spinoza’s dictum. Every pot must sit on its own bottom or it is deemed useless.
You are absolutely right. The brethren movement is 100% cultic. Expect from you to address the mantra “ the bible is the inerrant word of God. First reading it is full of errors and contradictions, second God never put his stamp of approval ( by a miracle from heaven for all of us to see and acknowledge.
I am still trying to understand...why someone who would post their views regarding bible commentators... would bother posting things regarding science verses religion.. or atheism verses theism.. are you a garage philosopher... or do you actually have any degrees in the topic you are discussing?.. I can halfway.. appreciate.. you giving your opinion on bible commentary notes... such as Scofield's... because as you stated before... you HAVE used the Scofield's.. bible.. and thus are familiar with its notes... and text.. but do you really know anything regarding conscience other than what you yourself have ?.. when you make videos such as these do you not realize that you are doing the same thing that you accuse people like Scofield of doing... which is passing off your opinions.. to others as if they are in fact reality?... your opinions regarding conscienceness are in fact just that your opinions... and this should be stated in NO UNCERTAIN terms... completely thru your presentation... just as you demanded that Scofield should have done regarding HIS comments... do you see how that works both ways?..
don't you think sir... that what you are stating is a "given".. or should be understood automatically without saying so... ... that ANY commentary bible.. is a bible with comments based on the editor's viewpoints.?. I think a disclaimer at the beginning of the bible on the title page that states.. "these views are strictly from the bias of the commentator there in".. or something to that affect.." would be a bit redundant... would it not be better to do THAT than to have the commentator state after every insight.. page by page these are their own views..? we may as well have a disclaimer on the title page as well telling the reader of the King James bible that the text they are reading is from the King James interpretation of the original manuscripts as well.. this would read:..... "all text here in are based on the King James translation of the original manuscripts"... I mean is this Not automatically understood?.
Unfortunately it's not. I've seen many fundamentalist bible teachers treat commentary like it's as infallible as the bible itself. I live in deep east Texas though, and most preachers seem to have little to no understanding of how to properly study the text on their own.
@@TheNationOfTexas hmmm that is sad... I remember when I was teaching Sunday School... after a week of studying... through different commentaries.. I would present these views to my class... and tell them.. this person feels this passage is saying this.. or this commentator... believes this... but at least... the class was very aware.. that anything I was teaching was just that... and I would stress that they need to allow the Holy Spirit to lead and direct them.. many times they would press me as to what I personally believed.. but I tried to dissuade those questions.. because... even I did not wish to mislead anyone.. in case I was mistaken in regards to my view.... I never presented a comment as if "God said it".. although I agreed personally with many comments ... but I let everyone know.. that there were varying opinions...
Atheism is just another form of evangelism where in both cases someone is claiming they understand reality. I only know one thing for certain which is I know nothing about who or what or why I am. We are products of what we know so believe carefully.
Free will is to a certain extent an example of agency. We must have some amount of agency and anything that's required for that agency is the constrained free will allowable for the organism. It isn't binary. Life is so highly constrained that free will is, only until recently when we started arguing about free will, completely in service of the moment we are in.
Argument from ignorance - science does not have an explanation of consciousness therefore I am justified in believing [insert whatever you like here as your explanation] . Several hundred years ago lightning had to be Thor's hammer Mjölnir because there was no other explanation. Several hundred years ago there was no 'scientific' explanation of the world so it must have been created by god. Today theists use the same argument but just substitute the universe for the world. Whether or not this will eventually be the case for consciousness is an open question but current lack of a scientific explanation does not justify some other explanation unless there is actual evidence supporting that other explanation.
I just want to say thank you! I am majoring in Physics and Philosophy and I came to this video as a means of studying but learned a ton about the importance of my own majors and their connection. This has inspired me to continue pursuing them.
@gregorywilliams3769 if you are interested there is a "New Scofield Reference Bible".. that was first published in 1967 under THAT title.. which was edited by J. Schuyler English....I believe.. that contains slightly different footnotes and commentary..
"What is taught at the world's best universities..." what kind of a critical reference is that? You certainly covered your ass there, Richard. Read up on Lacan's Rome discourse. It wil teach you something about the function of science in the human psyche.
The King James Bible is the true word of God! Not the Scofield Bible.... The NIV Bible is not the true word of God..... Wake up! Hear what Dr. Gene Kim says about the King James Bible.
Im 62, I was raised in a Baptist church, and so was my wife. When I accepted Christ as Lord of my life, @23yrs old, I started realizing that what I was being taught was not what I was reading in God's word. I'm not bashing here, I'm just saying that every church teach what their doctrine is and claim it as truth. For me, I believed in what Baptist taught as truth, and it's taken me years to get rid of a lot of these so-called truths. My loving wife has had a way harder time doing this than I because she accepted commentary as truth also. It's like being brainwashed, and I find my personal views are forever changing on a lot of things. Thank you for saying and sharing what you have said. We tend to a non-denominational church now, but these doctrines are always out and about.
@okeechobeejoe2868 I just read your comment and all I have to say is I will be praying for you brother... I was raised as a Catholic.. but at the age of 16 I realized the Catholic teaching had a lot of strange things going on.. I met a gal whose brother was a minister in the Vhurch of Christ.. and I almost became a member.. this was in 1974.. but the idea of Baptismal Salvation did not sit well with me.. fast forward ... 21 years.. 1995.. I re married.. and one Sunday being churchless.. and Now having 3 kids.. I and the whole family woke up on a Sunday morning EARLY. .and my wife asked me what do you want to do today?.. I said I'd like to go to church.. but Not just any church.. I wanted to try the little Baptist church down the street which I grew up around.. we all went.. upon hearing my first Baptist sermon.. I knew what I was lacking all my life... and 2 weeks later I accepted the Lord as my Savior... and was baptized 2 weeks after that.. that was in 1995.. and I have been on fire for God ever since... and still a Baptist,.. reading the King James.. as my preferred bible translation.. I do not know what happened to you.. or what sort of weird preaching or directives you were under... but I am praying the Lord will call you back to a good church... non denominational churches as well as inter-denominational churches.. are a work of the devil.. in order to get people to accept a One World Religion... and I feel will be one of the things that will eventually usher in the Anti-Christ...
@@okeechobeejoe2868 I am still puzzled as to why you left the Baptist religion... Galatians 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: the only thing I can figure is that you were in a "messed up".. Baptist church with a qwerky pastor.. who perhaps was Not preaching a true Gospel.. or something blinded your eyes to the truth... that is why I am praying for you.. to either realize that perhaps that Baptist church you were a part of was corrupt... or.. that God.. would reveal to you why you did Not feel comfortable with the Baptist beliefs?.. did you have trouble with the "Westminster Confession of Faith"..?.. or perhaps the "London" or "Baptist" confession of faith"...?..
@@okeechobeejoe2868 BTW... there is nothing wrong with views changing from time to time... my views I had as a young Christian were a lot mor naive than they are now.... 20 years ago I did not even know what Lordship Salvation was.. or the Calvinistic point of view... I have learned a lot in thes past 20 years... I think it is good for ones views to change ..PROVIDED that the views are bringing us to a better closer understanding of God... and a deeper walk with Him.... I am sorry but I just don't see how this cold happen in a non denominational church... could you explain this to me so I can understand what you have been learning from them?.. and do they even use a King James Bible to preach and teach from?..
I appreciated your comments. We all need to think critically. The sad thing is that millions of Christians never get to the point where they subject their beliefs to criticism. God bless you.
The Scofield Bible uses the text of the KJV and adds footnotes based on the views of John Nelson Darby, who developed the standard view of what is known as dispensationalism today. Like most things biblical, there are many widely diverging views, even among dispensationalists, but there tend to be common threads within most schools of thoughts. Whenever you get any Bible translation or commentary done by an individual, you are basically simply getting their viewpoint.
@DavidJackson-pk4xy and what do you have against a dispensational viewpoint?.. I may as well add since you are not a dispensationalist...which I am guessing you are not.... what do you have against Calvinism?.. do you accept the Covenant view that Scofield presents.. or are you against the different Covenants as well.. such as Edenic.. Adamic...Noahic... etc...? I agree with you on this.. "Whenever you get any Bible translation or commentary done by an individual, you are basically simply getting their viewpoint." and we need to be careful... and scrutinize.. what we read in various commentaries... but please don't toss out the baby with the bath water..
Solid talk. The escape from Descartes project is counter cultural with its elevation of physical knowledge over other ways of encountering the world. Epistemology pushed Ethics and Aesthetics off the Philosophy Department agenda until Rorty fought back and challenged Representalism. Still, epistemology triumphs on as the handmaiden of STEM studies in academia. Hegel and the Continental tradition languish in English speaking countries to this day
