Welcome to Changing Vegas LLC ~ An Independent Game Development + Film Studio in Las Vegas.
We're merging video games, casino games, and crypto.
As a community-based business, we create original Vegas games - and entertainment content - for Millennials (and younger). We believe in and practice innovation & collaboration. We hire Las Vegas talent. Last year, we launched www.SuperDealerSchool.com - the first comprehensive online casino dealing school.
Our videos feature: - Table game tips from "SuperDealer" Dave. (He's been a professional Vegas dealer for 13 years.) - Asteroid Arena! progress updates, events & community building - Early access information about our new game, Crypto Court Poker - Vegas Esports News - Vegas restaurant, bar & entertainment reviews
Hope you enjoy watching our content as much as we enjoy making it! - Dave
Thank you for this video, hosted a tournament and we ran into a similar situation but it was an all in after the flop and everyone called the all in but I had put everyones call into the main pot and had his all in to the side as well instead of putting his all in into the initial main pot and then starting a side a side pot afterwards. Eventually got it worked out. Been looking for this video for these situations
Is there not a benefit for the person all in because anyone who is put into a side pot may fold and lose the main pot where the all in person is unable to be forced out of the main pot
you shouldnt be spreading the deck at the end of a deal, rules changed, you are supposed to place it face down with cut card on top. What u spread, and card is face up/marked/notched?
One thing. At 6:00 min you kill the side pot loser. You didn't mention that he was even playing for the main pot. I suspect you looked at original all-in to determine that he was beat. ..but didn't say anything. (right before that you said not even to look at the orig all-in at 5:39. A tad confusing to me. Am I see this wrong?
All 3 were competing for the main. The side pot loser can't win the main if he didn't win the side. He's competing with his side pot opponent and if he can't win the side then he has already lost the hand and thus also can't win the main.
Board is 9d 10c Ks Kh 10 h I have Kc / Js Villain: Kd / Qs The dealer said his kicker was higher…I argued it’s a chop and they wouldn’t bring the floor supervisor over. Seems weird
If your poker dream truly matters to you, find the strength to keep your head up and power through all of the inevitable tough times along the way. And there will be many, many tough times. But you got this, lets grind.
The clearer your vision for your poker career, the easier it will be for you to do the necessary work. If a clear vision is not set out, it can become challenging to get the work done as you can be pulled in different directions instead of focusing on what's important to you.
this is good and helpful but I have noticed that there's a lot of slamming and slinging of the chips in American dealing. Everyone here slams and slings the chips. It's very distracting.
Jesus, will no video on YT answer my question? What. Happens. If . You . Have. THE MOST NUMBER OF CHIPS OF ALL PLAYERS and. You. Go. All . In 20 videos, so far, no answers . If you go all in with 100 dollars of chips, but everyone else has UNDER 100 bucks, don’t you just make them all fold and win? And now you can keep winning indefinitely since no one will have more chips than you
No you stupid fuck, you just don’t speak English. I got my answer finally, in the real world. I’d tell you what it is, but why bother @@psychosneighbor1509
No, if you go all in with 100, and i then all in with 40, I'm eligible to win only 40 of yours. If no one else calls, or all ins, and i win, I'll earn my 40, your 40, and you'll keep the 60
No you don't just win because you have more chips/cash then everyone else. That only happens in the movies, lets say its just you and me in the hand, you go all in with $100 and I only have $40, well I call you so you take $60 back out because I'm only entitled to win what I put in, it wouldn't be fair if I was able to win your $100 if I'm only putting in $40, if this doesn't make sense can we PLEASE play a real game of poker sometime...
Exactly what I wanted. Currently a table games dealer and I think side pots is probably the bit that had me most nervous about wanting to try training as a poker dealer. Never occurred to me that it was this simple. And then of course one of those guys on the side are eligible to win the side and the main pot since they cover. And if there were more all-ins, you just keep doing same thing, basically whoever all-ins "owns" that pot. I was thinking I had to do some quick math to see how to split the shit lmao.
Good video thanks. Looking to deal some games where this is played and had no clue about it til now. Nicely explained. Now need to find your vid with the other two b's. You're that succinct I'd like to hear you explain awkward side/split pots in TH and mental methods to quickly track pot in PLO. As a new dealer I struggle to stay vocal in PLO for trying to keep up, especially when 3 and 4 bet pre, including how that figure changes through the blinds.
the weird question ARISES in a certain situation where lets say we have 5 people the table is 1/2$ now. 6 people go to see a flop- so there a main pot already-everyone covered a certain amount of money now- player-1-has 500$ postflop player-2-has 200$ players 3-has 300$ player 4-has-150$ player-5-has 500$ (all post flop stack) to all players player one assume is on the small blind player 5 is the button. player 1 BETS (UTG)-100 dollars call,call,-player 4 goes all in for 150$ player-5-says i all ALSO ALL IN and everybody calls. since i am a dealer i want to know does my strategy work. if we start making up the main pot-we will add 5x150 right so i must have 750 in my main pot then whats left will be (from player 2) 50$ (since 200-150) equals 50 we create the side pot for him-so that makes 4x50=200 right i must have 200$ in my second side pot but now it gets weird because player 3-has 300-that makes him left with a hundred so-3x100=300 must be my third side pot thats okay but now i got lost in my calculation. because if the dudes with 500$ stacks still play on we have took-500-150 from them 350. we took 50, from the other side pot and now they are left with 300. we remove the other 100 that makes their stack a total of 200. so the final side pot between player 1 and 5 must be 400? is this correct-and is there a simpler way to create this
Hey there! Let me take a shot at this one. So player 5 says ALL IN and everybody else calls. So since player 5 is tied with player 1 for the most money on the table - all players are all in. So there should be no additional betting after that first bet - they don't "play on" in this situation. The main should have 750 (150x5) in it - like you said. The first side pot should have 200 (50 x 4) The second side pot should have 300 in it (100x3) The rest goes in the working pot (it should have 400 in it) There is a short cut though - but with a pot this complicated I would only use this technique if you are an advanced dealer. Once they all go ALL IN - have them leave the money in front of them - and build the pots after you determine the winner. The reason for this is if one of the 500 players win the pot (player 1 or player 5) then you don't have to do any calculating at all. Since they have the most money on the table, they would win all of the side pots along with the main anyways. So in this situation, you can just ship them all of the cash without breaking them down into side pots. Even if a short sack would win, you could still save time. Let's say player 3 wins ($300). He would win all of money on the table except for the working pot. If this happens, you ship them the short stacks along with $300 from each of the $500 players. Then, Player 1 and 5 would showdown for the working pot. I know this was kind of an essay - but I hope this helps!
