Тёмный
USDHumanitiesCenter
USDHumanitiesCenter
USDHumanitiesCenter
Подписаться
The University of San Diego's Humanities Center is dedicated to the exploration of the human condition and the limitless ways in which human beings understand and interact with our world. The Humanities Center provides opportunities for USD not only to organize and coordinate liberal arts initiatives and programs for our campus community, but also to establish partnerships with the broader San Diego community and beyond. In this manner, the Center is engaged in the practice of what is known as “public humanities,” the meeting point of engagement and humanistic study, and manifests its commitment to ensuring the accessibility of the humanities to our wider community.
Joan Perlman on Sweep
51:50
21 день назад
Last Lecture Series | Dr. Zulema Reynoso
1:21:42
21 день назад
Roots of an Afro-Argentine
1:00:29
4 месяца назад
Комментарии
@johnmaisonneuve9057
@johnmaisonneuve9057 7 месяцев назад
Chomsky’s knowledge of intellectual history is truly amazing.
@JamesPeach
@JamesPeach 7 месяцев назад
Invaluable interview
@clumsydad7158
@clumsydad7158 7 месяцев назад
Wittgenstein & Heidegger ... enuff said
@Dino_Medici
@Dino_Medici 8 месяцев назад
BEAUTYYYYYYYYY
@johnbarrymore5827
@johnbarrymore5827 11 месяцев назад
Thank You
@johnbarrymore5827
@johnbarrymore5827 11 месяцев назад
Thank You
@tangoalpha1905
@tangoalpha1905 11 месяцев назад
"The trouble with "Progress", is that it always looks much greater than it really is." I think I'm firmly in the Witggenstein camp.
@u.thebruce7493
@u.thebruce7493 7 месяцев назад
In many ways, modern media is exactly this phenomenon of illusory progress. I am thinking especially the dialectic between television and RU-vid. In many ways, RU-vid - the internet - seems just another form of television, but when you think about it, it is perhaps the apotheosis of media. What ought one to do? We really are confronted with our own fecklessness as we surf the web; there isn’t any reason to choose one video over another: the “dangling conversation” isn’t going on in an AI generated singularity, but rather in the living room, just like people used to be totally controlled by the church. Even the most stoic sentinel needs religion to return to the source, or achieve ecstasy, but the end of history is already here and indeed, philosophy is an activity, but also a facticity. We want there to be imaginary truths that can pacify our meticulous - unready - souls, but in the end all we can do be thankful and keep striving, and maybe work out to find out where it all went wrong. But maybe there are no mistakes in life, since you live so you learn. Freedom is the highest of all things to be gained. What we want to do, is within our reach. Knowing that, RU-vid is already quite the miracle of human handiwork.
@cryptosuccess_ih
@cryptosuccess_ih 11 месяцев назад
Insightful lectures. Please who’s that person clearing their throat?? They could have gone to sort themselves out in the bathroom. That noise was ingratiating 😢
@willielee5253
@willielee5253 Год назад
All of the above Professor Brooks.
@Silvertestrun
@Silvertestrun Год назад
Ty
@abdulsameehpvt6668
@abdulsameehpvt6668 Год назад
Thank you for sharing..........I was searching for this topic for a long time
@zorgate
@zorgate 2 года назад
Webster's dictionary defines truth as...
@gloriamitchell3518
@gloriamitchell3518 2 года назад
🤩🤩❤️❤️
@JB-kn2zh
@JB-kn2zh 3 года назад
Awesome lectures. I would say there are other passages in Whitman regarding death that suggest he really does believe in an afterlife, perhaps through reincarnation into the invisible and impalpable realms he sometimes speaks of. E.g. when he says that he has already died a thousand deaths. Maybe I'm wrong and Whitman was just a materialist and it's only a metaphorical sort of immortality. But I'm not sure, he's a very tricky author.
@kristinamelnichenko5775
@kristinamelnichenko5775 3 года назад
This was awesome! The info about Orwell’s unpublished intro to Animal Farm is very interesting. Thank you for sharing this
@happilypanic8143
@happilypanic8143 3 года назад
This is a very nice interview, thank you for publishing it.
@USDHumanitiesCenter
@USDHumanitiesCenter 3 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@blossemdegroat2855
@blossemdegroat2855 3 года назад
Thank You .
@annelirantala8689
@annelirantala8689 3 года назад
Long live life, all beautiful around us😎
@WaliJpresents
@WaliJpresents 3 года назад
Great video! I'm Wali Jamal. The only actor in the WORLD to have performed in ALL TEN PLAYS in the Pittsburgh Cycle AND his one man show HOW I LEARNED WHAT I LEARNED. I performed them all with Pittsburgh Playwrights Theater. I am available for discussions, lectures, master class, and PERFORMANCE. If you'd like to talk more, just answer this comment. #WilsonianActor
@jangist5481
@jangist5481 3 года назад
I am so grateful for this brilliant discussion. Thank you.
@HontubeYT
@HontubeYT 3 года назад
Hello!
@Mohamed-qk6od
@Mohamed-qk6od 3 года назад
So inspirational 😇
@carmendeassis1857
@carmendeassis1857 4 года назад
I like you creativity with the gourds :-)
@awadbasem
@awadbasem 4 года назад
I enjoyed all three lectures. Insightful stuff. Alas, very few viewers.
@USDHumanitiesCenter
@USDHumanitiesCenter 4 года назад
I am glad you enjoyed the lectures!
@CCRexKanin
@CCRexKanin 5 лет назад
Thank you
@allenanderson4567
@allenanderson4567 5 лет назад
Is the idea that beauty is proportionality of parts a Pythagorean theory or is it a Stoic theory? I thought it was the latter.
@ginganinga1010
@ginganinga1010 4 года назад
definitely pythagorean
@Dgilstrapnature
@Dgilstrapnature 2 года назад
"It is actually said by everyone that the symmetry of parts in relation to each other and to the whole added to fine coloration makes something beautiful to see." Enneads 1.6.1. Dillon, King, Wilberding, note, "This is in particular the Stoic view, although it was widely held by others as well."
@ruvstof
@ruvstof 5 лет назад
Crumley's book on epistemology was for me very helpful.