Engage with High-Impact Learning Resources for GCSE and A-Level Sociology
Our concise 6-9 minute videos are perfect for A-Level sociology revision, GCSE Sociology, sociology lesson preparation, or challenging students to get ready for university-level study. These videos are designed to make complex concepts accessible and engaging, ensuring students are well-prepared and confident in their understanding.
We offer short, dynamic, and engaging sociology videos tailored specifically for A-Level students and educators. Each video is meticulously researched and crafted by experienced teachers and examiners to promote maximum long-term retention.
For years, educators have enhanced lessons with our resources through flipped learning. By using our videos and worksheets as pre-class activities, students come prepared, allowing teachers to focus on higher-order thinking, deeper discussions, and enriched learning.
one's ego is installed by society, starting with immediate family as society. the ego starts out small as toddlers and grows and calcifies over the years of our lives. in infants it's absent as far as I've observed. this strongly suggests to me that ego is a reaction to society. the more traumatic ones society is, the larger and more robust the ego is to compensate and protect (like a radar system always scanning for & assessing potential danger). what started as a security guard becomes our warden
Masculinity is not a concept, but a biological reality. Males play a crucial role in every society, which is the same at the core. The only thing that is a construct in this video is the entire subject of sociology.
From a sociological point of view, green criminology examines: 1. Power and inequality - How corporations and powerful groups disproportionately harm the environment and evade accountability. 2. Social justice - The impact of environmental crime on marginalized communities and vulnerable populations. 3. Globalization - How global economic systems contribute to environmental degradation. 4. Cultural values - How societal attitudes toward consumption, growth, and nature shape environmental harm. 5. Regulation and enforcement - The role of laws, norms, and policies in addressing or ignoring environmental crimes. Hope that’s helps. The video explains most. 😊
yes you do crime until the society you have destroyed becomes a shithole and you are surrounded by other criminals that will backstab you, you create a hellhole with crime, for a short term relief
Crime is not primarily an economic, equality or emotional issue. Crime follows from inadequate implementation of the Golden Rule of doing to others what you would have done to you. The basis for this is proper self-love from which respect, dignity, compassion and other healthy behaviors have their roots.
Wouldn’t it be more fair to say that the golden rule is inadequate for mammals? You’re acting like you don’t have a hungry stomach and won’t die in 100 years. Philosophy doesn’t start until after a full stomach and the vigilance of combat for survival is over. The golden rule does not fit the majority of experiences had by humans in their history on this planet
crime also exist in equality just look at china or north korea there the ruling leaders are the criminals, a divinly set hirarchy is needed for human progress if society is a competition of equality society systematically collapses
I liked this video until it started stereotyping Hindu ideas and practice about caste. The section after minute 5 is IMO racist. Some subtlety is needed here.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the video. We appreciate your feedback and understand your concerns about the section discussing Hindu practices and the caste system. It's important to approach such topics with sensitivity and nuance, given the complexity and diversity within religious and cultural traditions. Our intention was to provide a Marxist perspective on how religion can be used to justify social inequalities, using the caste system as one example. However, we acknowledge that this might have come across as oversimplifying or stereotyping a deeply intricate and varied belief system. Your point about needing more subtlety in discussing these matters is well taken. We will be sure to consider this feedback in future content to ensure a more balanced and respectful approach to such topics. Thank you again for bringing this to our attention. Your input is valuable in helping us improve the quality and thoughtfulness of the content. As this is a complex topic we have removed the case study on the caste system. Please note it may take a day or so for RU-vid to update the file.
In my eyes this theory has always been both Marx and Engels' biggest inherit flaw. It should be noted for any modern Marxist that both Marx and Engels had an understanding of human sociology that was sometimes presumptuous and often has not stood the test of time. While there is certainly a fair case to be made that modern family structures (the "nuclear" family) are in many ways influenced by capitalism, both Marx and Engels overstep their bounds in their belief to what aspects of which are in fact products of capitalism, specifically monogamy. Both made the (even at the time baseless) assumption that monogamy is a social construct tracing it's roots in the creation of capital, and that humans are more naturally inclined to unrestrained polyamory. This is a naturalist argument against monogamy, so in the sake of fairness let's give it a naturalist answer. The problem with this is that since then sociology has developed further as a field and it seems as though this does not reflect reality. Humans in a tribal society seem to be, with any exception exceedingly rare and more often than not cause for conflict, predisposed to three main forms of relationship; monogamy, serial-monogamy (a series of monogamous partners) and polygyny (the act of a male having multiple female mates). Monogamy as the status quo, serial-monogamy when a male partner dies and polygyny more often than not to account for the higher female:male sex ratio due to the higher male mortality rate. Thus making not only monogamy natural, but making this "promiscuous horde" concept his very own construct.
Тут пишут, что мужчины чаще совершают преступления, потому что женщин все поддерживают, особенно эмоционально. Ну да, ну да Я вижу оскорбления женщин как мейнстримное медиа каждый день. Женщин считают за животных. В японском рисованном corn гуро это мейнстрим. Мы живем в мире, зная, что во многих странах у женщин нет обычных человеческих прав. И при этом мужские сограждане нашей страны говорят "вот бы и у нас так!". Виктимблейминг даже по отношению к восьмилетним. Насилию в отношении женщин радуются и чуть не национальный праздник по этому поводу устраивают. Сравни женщин, похищенных мужчинами в подвал с количеством мужчин, которые женщины похитили и заключили в подвале. Насилие над женщинами - мейнстрим, которым гордяться, это больше не темный секретный уголок интернета. Подписка на сливы это теперь долг любого школяра. Не существует женщины, которая не сталкивалась с домогательствамии с подросткового возраста. Я стараюсь изо всех сил избегать помоек, но все равно каждый день вижу тонну мизогинии. И думаю о женщин Афганестана, Дагестана, да и России, в которой домашнее насилие и отрезание гениталей девочкам легально. Я живу в этом мире. О какой эмоциональной поддержке вы говорите? Я ни разу не видела чтобы мужчин называли оскорблениями, которые существуют только для женщин. Да даже в каментах под этим видео снова оскорбляют и мифологизируют женщин, как будто они плачут от всего и только мужская печаль может иметь вескую причину. Кстати, неработающие домохозяйки - миф. Это реальность для маленького количества богатых семей. Женщины работают. Вот это сюрприз. 80% женщин сидящих за убийство это сидящие за самооборону (рф)
The one reason - gender socialization is toxic and dangerous. And no one never talks about it. Men don't born bad, women dont born kind. IT IS SOCIALIZATION ONLY. ONLY. But people continue silent about it. It's the most censorship topic in the world.
. Although the Neo-Marxist's relentless onslaught on the twin Institutions of "Marriage" & "Family" has continued unabated since the 60's, now they're gearing up to bring it at the forefront of their Movement after the LGBTQIA+ push; I just watched this (it's available on RU-vid): Description Family Abolition (with ME O'Brien, Jules Gleeson, and Dan Berger) Historical Materialism: Critical Marxist Theory 16Likes 404Views Sep 202023 A discussion of ME O'Brien's new book 'Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care' (20 September 2023) ---------- For some of us, the family is a source of love and support. But for many others, the family is a place of private horror, coercion, and personal domination. In capitalist society, the private family carries the impossible demands of interpersonal care and social reproductive labor. Can we imagine a different future? In Family Abolition, author M.E. O’Brien uncovers the history of struggles to create radical alternatives to the private family. O’Brien traces the changing family politics of racial capitalism in the industrial cities of Europe and in the slave plantations and settler frontier of North America, explaining the rise and fall of the housewife-based family form. From early Marxists to Black and queer insurrectionists to today’s mass protest movements, O’Brien finds revolutionaries seeking better ways of loving, caring, and living. Family Abolition takes us through the past and present of family politics into a speculative future of the commune, imagining how care could be organized in a free society. ME O'Brien is the editor of two magazines, Pinko and Parapraxis, and the co-author of the novel Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052-2072. Her new book is Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care. Dan Berger is Associate Professor of Comparative Ethnic Studies at the University of Washington at Bothell. He is the author most recently of Stayed on Freedom: The Long History of Black Power Through One Family’s Journey. Jules Gleeson is a writer, historian, and comedian. She is the co-editor of Transgender Marxism and has published essays in outlets including Viewpoint Magazine, Invert Journal, and VICE.
