Sounds like a hot process, hydrogen allows for stable burn temps if metered correctly, star slow an work your way up to 1832F or higher, ash will react at 2910F in a process call ash fusion, but I don't believe you need that high of a temp for this process if you using hydrogen something about the gas vs oxygen factors in believe it lowers the point for the ash fusion to occur. I'm no thermal engineer but makes sense in the process, you should apply this process to other catalytic converter application other than diesel engines like gas engines...
You are right but by doing a carbon clean and the truck will gain 0 to 60 and 1 second faster I have the data. And in California you have no choice you have to keep the DPF on the truck.
I have an 04. The problem is getting parts for the truck to keep it up and working properly. It becomes a chore. I still have my older truck but I did buy a used 2019. We shall see how this works. The 2019 only works and does long trips. Daily driving it is out in my book. I use my older truck for that.
I would believe this more if the mechanic in the video wasn’t listed as “part of the team” on your website. That and you fed him the answers you wanted him to say instead of just asking him the questions.
He is now part of our team. He was a non believer. Once he seen it for himself he wanted to be involved. His master mechanic knowledge and my hydrogen on demand knowledge has advanced our system. You can have all the doubt you want. We are working together to save fleets money. He spent years dealing with the all the dpf, emission issues and now that is no longer an issue for him. BTW he has more knowledge about the emissions on engines than most mechanics out there. Together we educate companies to help them save money.
So frustrating trying to get through to people and give it a chance. There’s been so much propaganda attempting to ruin the reputation of hydrogen and HHO. Its ridiculous how on most videos you get these weird shills coming out and making the same bs comments.. You’ve got to ponder,,,..why are they even seeing these videos when they hate HHO so much? Ill still these people going out of the way to make multiple posts , putting a lot of time into comments about tech they have ZERO honest interest in. Are they bots? Boughts? However since we are no longer on the petro dollar standard technically they should chill out as its no longer “disruptive tech” Now would also be the chance to get some real goldmines of knowledge in response to FOIA requests. ( hopefully you follow the whole petro dollar/disruptive technology’s connection … early bird gets the worm.
I love how other carbon cleaning companies watch my videos and try to get information out of us. we've spent over a half a million dollars in testing at labs.
A car with an exhaust system has always had a rusted exhaust after a couple months, as there is always humidity in a cold exhaust. Which evaporates when the exhaust starts heating up.
This is thermodynamically impossible. A combustion engine gets, best case, upwards to 50 % efficiency and the electrolyzer is something similar. Even if they got it perfectly efficient no extra energy is provided into the system so all the work will come from the gasoline anyway. With real world inefficiency this will consume more energy than not using the system...
We have a proprietary process that creates high quality hydrogen and oxygen. I know it's out side the box of what has been taught. We have been in business over 16 years and we have been to several labs around the world including 2 of the CARB qualified labs in CA developing and proving out the technology. We get amazing results on engines around the world from 4L engines to over 89 L engines. We have a microcontroller that creates precise amounts of hydrogen and oxygen by catalysis. This is why we get the amazing results. We are committed to researching and advancing the technology.
Personally, I think all of you guys in the business over the years have been riding the wrong hydrogen wave, if you have been successful in this area, I'd say you continue to do so and don't worry about the people who argue against it. Most are paid trolls and propagandalists paid to do it and the sad reality is the public is generally stupid and doesn't care. Make your money and fuck everyone else but i still think everyone should have been building hydrogen oxygen separation refinery systems and storage tank systems including low pressure hydrogen hydride systems. We should have been figuring out how to manufacture tritium and concentrate deuterium with the electrolyzers. We should have been building fuel cells and studying the hydrogen lenr cold fusion tech. HHO injection is a vintage 1990s tech, you lucky you got to be one of the players still installing these systems.
You are right and what you say. I am so busy I can't even do all the work that I got and I'm very successful at hydrogen on demand because we're doing catalysis not electrolysis and making a higher quality hydrogen as you know.
my boss a mechanical engineer and a heavy duty deisel mechanic and worked in cylinder head performance for yella terra heads, built hho cells for many decades ive built my own for 15 years its easy, but the results on omissions tests blows the guys away every time , they assume their testing equipment is faulty. everywhere you drive it feels like you have a tail wind . and why wouldnt it considering atleast 24% of fuel is unburnt when the exhaust valve opens yet with hho and an appropriate cell its 96% burnt before the exhaust valve opens , as Gavin Knoxx showed at the university of W.A.
@@scottsmith6960 my boss has no channel hes retired im almost there myself. however i know gavan knox has a website with data, hes a university scientist of some kind. i just type gavin knox hho it comes up
We spent a half a million dollars testing and I'm not going to get into that because it is a process that we do different and we use different kind of metal that I won't disclose.
@@scottsmith6960 The reason I ask is that I have spent 30 years in the hydrogen industry and written several papers on the subject including the EPA 2017-a, Hydrogen in road vehicular application and ive never come across a software written deliverable for hydrogen production or indeed a different method of production of breaking down the chemical structure of H with the atomic structure 1. I have also never found a way to burn the ash within a DPF or any other catch type vessel. Thats not to say I know everything. Im an engineer and learn almost weekly which prompted me to ask the question. I dont expect you to give out and proprietary information but have you thought about patenting this ability to burn ash in the DPF with hydrogen. I can guarantee you that I could get you many millions if you were willing to license the capability.
Just like there is different qualities of gasoline and Diesel. There are different qualities of hydrogen . Poorly made hydrogen cells make steam. You can compare flame color, burn rate. And sound of explosion. I have posted a video on the differences.
@@scottsmith6960 There are 3 types of hydrogen. Grey (steam), blue (steam with carbon capture) and green (electrolysis). Protium, Deuterium and Tritium. H (single atom with single electron) and H2, (2x electrons). You cant produce a chemical formula outside of the compound process if you are suggesting that your formula for delivery is electrolysis?
@@scottsmith6960 Ahh, so you are bonding Tetrahedral organically and injecting the organic material into the intake together with the hydrogen gas and this is the component you wrote the software to inject ? This makes sense now. Very clever move.
We make a higher quality hydrogen it has four times more energy. I have the data to back it up. Most hydrogen companies make a low quality hydrogen. I also wrote the software to be a precise amount for each engine application.
@@scottsmith6960 Ash comes from oil, not fuel. It consists of heavy metals, friction modifiers and other polymeric long chain hydrocarbons. It is very difficult to burn it off. Can take temps over 1800°f. So unless your hydrogen is increasing the temperature in the DPF to 1800°f I don’t see how you can burn ash away with just hydrogen. Are you fogging in some sort of chemical to help burn away the ash?
@@scottsmith6960 This is possible but to control the hydrogen flow would mean reducing the temperature which in turn would mean that the ash cannot be burnt. If you did use hydrogen to produce the temperature required to remove ash, it would melt the dpf unit. Again, hydrogen is a great method of carbon reduction but no way in the world will it remove ash in this environment.
I have a way of doing it with software watching the nox sensors aboard the truck. I have two California EOs and done extensive testing at labs to prove all this technology. I'm not going to sit here and argue with you I don't have time but we are doing it and I have the data to back it up.
Hey Scott, I have been trying to call CVHHO and T-SSINC to get some questions answered but I guess the company has gone out of business? Please post if there are any changes in name or whats happening if you would.
That's funny because we've been doing this for 16 years never had a problem. Hydrogen oxygen combined with the atmospheric air so fast. We have exhausted testing on that.
Are these available to the civilian market? I noticed your website only does commercial. I assume this system works best with fuel injected engines as they can decrease fuel delivery on demand. would it work on a carbureted vehicle? if so I'd assume one would need to lean the carb so the hydrogen can properly replace the gasoline?
I am trying to find out if this system will work on a marine diesel engine. I want to build a catamaran but I don't want to use conventional diesel. Please advise on your opinion
Hey Scott, I’m looking to install an HHO system on my 2011 f-250 6.2 Super Duty. I live in southern Wisconsin. Any suggestions on where I can get an HHO setup? Thanks
With the amount of electrolyte we put in it is good for minus 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Anything below that are controller turns off the unit. An extreme cold areas we put a heater to heat up the water.
Because the ecu detects the tps is not moving. Maybe it will be effective in complex wiring will only cheat on while tps is on 5percent open. Some relays and a gas pedal switch. So it switch only when pedal
You want to fly out to my shop and come and look at my data personally absolutely can. I will not give it to anybody because it is worth millions of dollars!!
I would like to see videos of these results with labs testing others' hydrogen since you are so data driven. I don't doubt there is less, but you aren't saying how much less. 1% is still "less", but if the cost of the system is $2000 less, I think the value per dollar is more. I would like to see the LPM production in tandem with these results so we can accurately ascertain based on the LPM you're producing whether or not the differences are quantity flow limitations, or qualitative in nature. And if it's a quality issue with the gas, what is the source? Is it the lack of a drier? If so why don't you just hook one in and test to see if that's the only difference? A drier costs all of $30 to add in. But mentioning a $30 fix to get similar results on a cheaper system doesn't benefit your profit margin I guess.
