At the core of our work lies the belief that the Darwinian explanation of human origins is inaccurate and potentially harmful. Instead, we uphold the teachings of the Bible, affirming that God created the world in six days roughly 6,000 years ago. Our founder, Dr. Kent Hovind, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience from his 15 years of teaching science and math in high school, as well as his 50+ years of being a Baptist Pastor and Evangelist. We strive to utilize the most up-to-date scientific evidence to bolster faith in God's Word, ultimately bringing individuals closer to Christ. Our goal is to inspire and enlighten all who seek the truth about the divine origins of life on Earth. 488 Pearl Lane Lenox, Alabama 36475 855.BIG.DINO (855.244.3466) ext.3- Dr. Kent Hovind
My last question would be Do you really want to trade wisdom for knowledge The rejection of God is the knowledge of good and evil The knowledge of God is the beginning of all wisdom
The burden of proof is on you to prove that it doesn’t If evolution is so simple why don’t we see any evidence of it anywhere in the entire observable universe
Prove that flesh and bone exists outside of our atmosphere You claim to evolved over millions of years And yet here you are in this liitlle tiny world that you can’t escape
This kid has a foolish position If it’s alive it’s related The burden of proof is on you to prove that it isn’t My argument would be Life is unique to our observable universe Prove that it isn’t
One race muh human race is a lie. Like with dogs we call them all different breed groups and within those groups we call them different breeds. With humans we call them different races (breed groups) and within the different races we have different ethnicities (breeds). Just like with dogs there is some crossover between the groups and there’s some mixtures, so there is with humans too. People just reject the word “race” because it’s been demonized by the same people who say the atheist version of evolution is correct.
Someone needs to tell Kent we can hardy ever hear him. Doesn't matter if it's here or on SFT for debates... Maybe they need a pre-amp or something on those mics because this is ridiculous.
That’s weird cause it sounds great and plenty loud through even my phone speaker. I’ll turn it up a for next show. Sorry you’re having trouble hearing it.
A lot of "cussing" that preachers talk about are referring to words that are considered "bad" by our modern society. What these preachers wont tell you is that most "cuss" words would never be considered profane by biblical standards. Like the word for feces, explain how thats a sin. That word wasnt considered vulgar until a white man conquered another white man and didnt like his family (battle of Hastings, 1066 AD) Preachers, please explain what you think "cussing" is, because youre probably wrong. Love this ministry and what they do. Keep it up. Hosanna in the highest!!
Hey, you mentioned in another video that the Church of Christ agreed that the Book of Mormon was inspired. Based on what I’ve read so far ( not much), the early LDS did initially call themselves the Church of Christ but changed the name. Now apparently Alexander Campbell, the founder of the actual denomination/religion Church of Christ, did have correspondence with Joseph Smith. They both were restorationists. However, Campbell later on retracted his initial positive opinions on Mormonism. If you know more about this, I’m all ears.
all Darwinists gotta do is make up a story, and we gotta prove that it’s wrong, they can keep us busy for the rest of our lives! 😑😑😑 “Shifting the burden of proof“ is not science!
Hey Kent Hovind. It's nice to see you on RU-vid again. I really enjoyed seeing your tour videos like this one and how you use science to give a spiritual lesson. I have a question for you if you have time to answer. After I watch your Q and A seminar on RU-vid, I was inspired to reading the KJV more. However, in the KJV, the Hebrew word Tannin means Dragon, but in the other version they use Jackels instead of Dragon because of the Hebrew word Tannim. Can you answer this if you can. Thank you, and God bless you and your ministry.
I believe it is the result of feeling God's breath within them. A piece of God's light is in us (flash of life) plus there's the Holy Spirit that resides within us which is part of the trinity that God is. So people feel that energy and come to this deluded assumption that they are God when in realtity they are only experiencing a teeny tiny fraction of who God really is.
Search me, O God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting. Psalm 139:23-24
{Psalm139:17-24KJV} 17 How precious also are thy thoughts unto me, O God! how great is the sum of them! 18 [If] I should count them, they are more in number than the sand: when I awake, I am still with thee. 19 Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men. 20 For they speak against thee wickedly, [and] thine enemies take [thy name] in vain. 21 Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? 22 I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. 23 Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: 24 And see if [there be any] wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.
After seeing Ian debate a few times, I'd be more inclined to take him a little more seriously if he didn't make personal attacks so often. As it stands, I can't help but think it's probably a matter of his wife wearing the pants in their relationship and Ian is left suffering some kind of little-man syndrome...hence his need to overcompensate. I like Brother Donny, but as the moderator he should've called out that kind of bad behavior.
Nice debate. Ians only solid argument was, that some animals lose genes (combine them). How they get them is none of his business. Kens strong argument, that even with tens of thousands of generations, a bacteria always remains a bacteria, kills Ians comination of genes theory. One totaly immoral experiment would be to exchange this uncombined gene in an ape for a human one and see if it becomes a human. (The other way around would also be possible, but even more morally reprehensible. ) Also: There has to be this mutation in at least 2 animals of a different sex or it has to be a dominant mutation. Also: It has to be beneficial or at least not harmful.
@@nepurdy «Thats not a completely corrupt organization.« LOL, because it makes your «evolution is not science« laughtable? just like Flat earthers say about nasa. LOL
Kent just doesn't deserve any kind of platform anymore. He's a broken record, is a dishonest debater and liar. He just grates on me now. He's easy pickings for people to make content on and should be retired.
@@sadsismint Question.. Then why are you here? By your watching and commenting, you are promoting his platform! So, thank you. My guess is that you are searching for something greater than yourself by looking at this kind of material. Otherwise, you'd go about your business. The way I see it is you can dig in and earnestly question your worldview as Lee Strobel (and millions of others) did or keep fighting what you know to be true and see where that gets you. Good luck!
Mr. Chen needs to look at the verse immediately following the two that he brought up about bring forth. After that, multiple kinds are brought forth in the plural..
9:50 Oh, yeah, because with arguments like this there's no way Sciman Dan can show his face to the internet again(sarcasm). Kent your argumentation is horrible. Even other young earth creationist figure out is horrible. Answears in genesis doesn't want to be affiliate with you. You are just a delusional narcissist.
