Black ops 2 and black ops 3 are on the same level. I'll explain. BO2 campaign was good and I enjoyed the multiple ways the campaign played out plus the unlocks that could be used that would enable replayability. BO2 multiplayer was great, not much more to be said. BO2 zombies started bad but eventually ended on 3 good maps. BO3 campaign was good but it felt too restrictive in terms of actual gameplay and much of the campaign was just dialogue. BO3 multiplayer was great. It provided hours of enjoyment. BO3 zombies is great but like BO2 it also had it's drawbacks. Zetsubo no shima didn't live up to the expectation of an island map. The giant Easter egg could've been better, the super Easter egg reward felt more like a kick in the teeth. In comparison BO2 and BO3 have the same footing. Both good games.
It's not a souls like my guy!! Stop the nonsense y'all ain't souls players!! Git gud on dark souls, bloodborne, sekiro then you will understand what a souls like is
Personally I'd ditch staff and go pure Moonveil with either the consecutive hit tear and talisman over more stamina tear and the 2 hand talisman. Probably drop you mind a little to get that endurance up for better armor and for extra swings unless your going for AoW spamming?
Maaaan almost any build will be great at level 165. You could just pick up random weapons, upgrade them, and a character w/ 60 str/dex will melt everything.
I agree with all this. When I was younger during BO2, me and my friends got all the DLC's for it's Multiplayer and Zombies. So each time we were at anothers house or all together, we would turn the game on and do some awesome Zombies. BO2 is my most favorite COD game out of them all
