Da je ovo na srpskom i da je štampano,imalo bi naslov kao Znakovi pored puta....Da,mislim na Andrića.. Mislim da Saša Srbulj ima više da kaže ljudima i to u formi eseja, ali nije loš trik postati stand up komičar umesto toga, jer to bar ljudi slušaju Niko ne čita, ali kroz ovu formu prolazi Pozdrav za gospodina Srbulja.
Since i love stand-up comedy so much, and i listen to it a lot, sometimes i come up with some ideas for a funny thing to say if i was a stand up comedian, which will never happen ( since i dont have the confidence or the charm for it really 😅) . One of them that i like goes something like this : "I've lived in Alaska for 7 years and after it ive decided to come back home to Serbia. People always ask me, why? Why would you come back to this country, economy is shit! Everything is shit, which it really is tbh. I say, you know, i thought about this a lot. And its very much like the Stokholm syndrom. I can't really rationalize it. Its not by any means a good idea, but i just need to be here to love my life. What can i say, I have a problem." Something like that. Someone could make it funnier but yeah. Now you can see why i dont do this job 😅
You should try standup. Go to an open mic. Why not? It can be fun to just try. See if you like it. For your premise above you can say things like: I moved back to Serbia from Alaska because I wanted to feel closer to Russia, or because you prefer more diversity of the bear population, or because 6 months of darkness wasn’t enough… etc… Good luck & have fun!
Diddy wasn't a conspiracy apparently, or the other two Harvey and Epstein. Someone shining the light. Fun no more, karma ready to collect..bunch of sweet people
My partner & went to Paris. We took two other family members with us as they had an event to attend so we figured why not drive them there & we could have a couple of days to ourselves & catch up with them later in the evening if we wanted to. We hated our time in Paris. Neither of us want to go back there again.
Going ‘back’ to Buffalo for a relative’s funeral or wedding… or taking a ‘Guys’ roadtrip for a Bills Game are quite literally the only acceptable reasons to voluntarily fly to Buffalo.
I have 4 friends for many years that are all gay. They have the absolute worst taste in clothes and interior decorating. They ask me, a straight guy for help.
I hope this dude really squeezed everything out of this bit because there is a lot of potential here, lol. Black eye is all about being good at basketball. Jew eye about saving money. Etc
This is similar to what ive been telling the religious types. The seperation of soul and body is the source of solipsism where you can identify as whatever you feel like on a Saturday because your soul takes the shape of a girraffe in your opinion and nobody can tell you otherwise.
The way i look at it is: You're gambling your life that GOD doesn't exist. If you win the bet, you gain nothing. But if you lose the bet, you lose everything. To believe that everything came from nothing, contrary to believing that everything came from something is a lose/lose situation, brother. Best wishes to ya
I respect what you’re saying. It’s similar to “pascal’s wager”. I just think you can’t fake faith. I mean you can fake it to people, but God would know if you’re faking it so you gotta be true either way. Thanks for your comment and Best wishes man!
Yikes. I let my eating disorder rule my life for too long... depriving your body of adequate nutrition for your specific needs will take you down. It just will. Your life will never be the same.
That's kind of bullshit. Obviously they were smart enough to keep it vague so they can silence any teacher for anything that doesn't allign with their ideology. The dude needs to come prepared though if he's gonna do controversial topics, so he can shutdown intellectually dishonest hecklers like those.
The language in the proposed legislation lumps together topics of sexual orientation and gender identity, with sexual content such as pornography and stripping.
The best part of this video is that this guy is so in his own world, that when presented with the option of learning the truth about the bill, he chose to remain ignorant. And then he posted it to RU-vid without realizing that he is the one that looks like an idiot in the situation
Well, another who has not read the bill but will talk about it. www.flsenate.gov/Committees/BillSummaries/2023/html/3159 Go ahead and check out the bill summary. This will also allow you to read the bill.
The bill is allegedly to stop "age inappropriate content from being taught to kids" however for the right, inappropriate means teaching kids that gay people exist.
He wasn’t misinformed. The bill is worded vaguely enough that any teacher with a child who has LGBTQ parents/guardians is put in a position of legal peril if they try to do any normal activity with children involving drawing pictures of parents or talking about families in general. Because if there is a child with say, two dads, even allowing that to be known in the classroom would violate the law. Thus a child with LGBTQ guardians or parents MUST be excluded from the rest of the class on activities. They MUST be discriminated against and cannot be told why. Hence why the bill is labeled the “don’t say gay” bill, as it is unnecessary of a bill other than to stigmatize and ostracize the LGBTQ community wherever it is present. It’s vague enough that it’s essentially a weapon
So, the bill that was passed has purposefully broad wording. It can even be argued that it goes agaisnt the 1st amendment by restricting free speech. There are 2 actual problems with the bill - • I agree that there is no need to teach sex ed to kids before 5th grade, but the bill only restricts sexual orientation (straight/gay) being discussed. • The second issue is becuase of the bills broad wording, it's has forced teachers to remove pictures of their partner from their desks, as school districts claim that they could be sued by parents if a student asks about the teachers non-straight relationship. The broad wording is the problem. As a kid in 1st grade there was already teasing about boys and girls hanging out. There definitely needs to be less of that. Kids don't need to know about the concept of boyfriends and girlfriends until they're ready for sex ed. Otherwise we start creating a divide between the genders so early and they don't understand each other. We really need to take all these teen relationships out of kids movies and TV shows so they're comfortable being friends with the opposite gender.
Well, another who has not read the bill but will talk about it. www.flsenate.gov/Committees/BillSummaries/2023/html/3159 Go ahead and check out the bill summary. This will also allow you to read the bill. Try actually reading something before commenting.
