"Scientific Facts" is a channel dedicated to exploring and presenting verified, evidence-based information on various topics in science. From groundbreaking discoveries to intriguing phenomena, the channel delivers accurate explanations and insights into the wonders of the natural world. With engaging visuals and clear explanations, viewers can expect to deepen their understanding of scientific concepts and stay informed about the latest advancements in fields such as physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and more. Whether you're a science enthusiast or simply curious about the world around you, "Scientific Facts" offers an educational and enlightening journey into the realm of science.
Stop fuckin up our universe what if, what if, why??? Just go water your garden bro... fuck!!! Always some dangerous brain dead idiot to prove that the last idiot wasn't the biggest idiot.
Empty space is not empty. It's filled with photons (particles), (dark matter) muon neutrinos, electron neutrinos, etc flying through it in every direction.
Reducing carbon emissions would be catastrophic for humanity The war on CO2 is a rejection of both physics and biology. The only significant effect of the increase in CO2 has been a massive increase in crop yields. 50 years ago the planet could not feed 4 billion people with about 1 million people being killed by famine every single year. Now, thanks to the rise in CO2, 3rd world crop yields have doubled, 1st world yields have quadrupled (thanks to fertilizers, and better seed weed and pest control not available to the 3rd world) and the planet is able to feed 8 billion people with fewer than 25,000 famine deaths per year. The only guaranteed effect of cutting CO2 would be to cut world food production and lead to the return of widespread famine. CO2 does NOT significantly warm the planet (it cannot), it is a very mild radiation shield that has to follow the same logarithmic shielding law as all other shielding. CO2 causes 3.7W/m2 of extra shielding ( which the Stefan Boltzmann law shows would result in just 0.7 degrees of warming) for every doubling of concentration. (even the IPCC accept this figure they just ignore the Stefan Boltzmann law) If the IPCC were honest and included the SB laws it would put the climate hysteria and them out of business; CO2 levels are about 9 'doublings' of CO2 above 1ppm or about 6 degrees of CO2 warming. To get another 6 degrees of warming would require CO2 levels to be over 170,000ppm. If CO2 was increased to the maximum level it has been in earth history (7000ppm) would be about 4 more 'doublings' or about 15W/m2 of extra shielding or 2.8 degrees C of warming. We could not significantly warm the planet with CO2 if we tried. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution CO2 has only increased by 50%. (280 to 420) even rounding up that it is just 2.5W/m2 of extra shielding. the warming effect of such extra shielding can be easily calculated using the Stephan Boltzmann equations (there are free calculators available online). is about 0.4 degrees C in 200 years of warming caused by CO2. To get a full degree of 'CO2 warming' compared to 1850 would require CO2 levels to be about 750ppm and to get another 1 degree of warming beyond that CO2 would need to be over 2000ppm. The climate is controlled by solar variability not CO2, put simply lots of big black spots on the sun reduces the energy reaching the planet's surface (as happened in the 1950's when the planet cooled) When sun spot activity is low more energy reaches the surface and the planet warms (as happened at the beginning of last century when America experienced the dust bowl and when we went through the latest minimum and the temperature peeked in 2012 (since then the ice sheets have been growing again)) The Maunder minimum was responsible for the planet warming out of the Little ice age not CO2 (co2 did not change just solar activity. CO2 is not our enemy, it is what is keeping us well fed.
@@Scientificfactstime No problem, it is information that is easy to find but totally ignored in the political lust to tax CO2. The are taxing the the gas that supplies all of the carbon for all carbon based life on the planet. The amount of biomass the planet can support is proportional to the level of CO2.
Umm actually, it's space which according to Hubbles Law expands faster than light at ginormous distance but space isn't a thing so nothing is faster than light 🤓🤓🤓
In the VII century mentioned in Kur'an the place with 2 sunrises and 2 sunsets. The desert shepherd could not know that without receiving knowledge about it from God. Allah-u Ekber☪️
What if black holes are the cause of "big bangs", yes; in plural. What if they start out as large behemoths and grow smaller and more dense the more mass they devour. What if once a black hole reaches its pinnacle in density it explodes as another "big bang"?
