I think you have escaped the simplification for acceleration component . That's the point where I need to comprehend the final form of acceleration component.
I deeply appreciate this video. I was unable to find a video relevant to my numerical analysis assignment and was frustrated. but thanks to you now i can plot the graph easily
Thank you very much for your nice explanation. Anyway, something is very clear here. For higher dimensions and for relative motion vectors and tensors for curvilinear coordinates is almost impossible. One now understand why Euler, Lagrange and Hamilton use another ideas to simplify this!!!
Good video, but I'd like to suggest that claiming "This must be so because if you do it any other way it is wrong" is a little counter-intuitive. It's true that, by elimination, you can arrive at a workable answer, but elimination is as good as guess-and-check, and doesn't clarify the idea behind the formula.