By 12:37 (I had to leave early) I haven't seen any particularly brilliant shooting, although he seems to have very good leaves. Probably doesn't need to make many brilliant shots due to the quality of his leaves, which I think is the mark of a truly marvelous player.
thanks for the compilation and the effort put in, I can argue with many shots to be or not to be in the list (or the order), but that is just personal preference. Number 1 and 41 are the same and I would not include obvious flukes in a list like this. cheers
Shot 8, 7, 6. Should have been 50, 49, 48. You got that a bit wrong. Plus the 8 one. How his appointment got out of that snooker. Was 10x better. If you have seen it.
There were a few flukes but the 1 thing about Ronnie compared to other's is he hates getting a fluke and feels like he cheated his opponent so apologises.
That's the worst compilation I've ever seen. The top 10 included 6 shots that I knock in on a regular basis. I have a high break of 60 something. Do you catch my drift? What a waste of 15 minutes.
Since I grew up watching Hendry. I personally think Hendry was better. Just my opinion as he dominated snooker for that period. Ronnie has overtaken him in terms of accolades now. Also since Ronnie is English he gets over glamorized. If Hendry was not a Scott it would have been a different story.
I like watching these snooker videos but can we please get away from showing some of the shots twice. This is not live footage, it can be edited to remove the replay or alternative camera angle.
A truly dreadful video.The greatest player of all time for sure and yet this clown 🤡 includes flukes and a certain shot twice.maybe I'm wrong but he's no connoisseur of snooker😢
The one at 7.48? Because he played for it, it was the best option, it was the best shot, it was sort of on and he knew it. And so did John Virgo commentating as did Ricky Walden, hence the smiles all round. I would say at 14.35 wasn't a fluke.
@@fontyyy No, I don't mean the one at 7:48, that's a famous shot where he deliberately played for luck to break the record and got the luck. No-one begrudges him that one. The one at 14:35 was absolutely a fluke. Pool players like Reyes can play those shots, with the smaller table, large balls and huge pockets, but no snooker player can deliberately do it. Plus he holds his hand up to his opponent in apology, i.e., he's saying it was a fluke. Plus the commentator -- a professional player -- labels it a fluke. So, I'm saying it shouldn't be included, and I don't know why you'd say it wasn't a fluke.
