You know it's odd you set up a site called "Standing For Truth" when you clearly have none to offer.

Revelation 14:9-11 if any man (anyone) worship's the beast, his image, or receives his mark, they will be tormented FOREVER. This means a believer can lose their salvation if they do these things. Some might say all they have to do is ask for forgiveness and they will be forgiven, and restored. That may be possible IF Jesus didn't send them the strong delusion, and that string delusion is that the antichrist is God 2 Thessalonians 2:7-12. God shall send them a strong delusion that they may believe the lie, and the lie is the antichrist is God. Once saved always saved is true IF u endure till the end, till the day of Redeeming. Slam dunk once saved always saved is conditional, they that endure til the end will be saved.

Luke 12:43-46 I thought this was a sure fire slam dunk from the other night I was on the broadcast with u guys. This is Jesus talking about one of his servants saying my Lord delays his coming, and he begin to drink and be drunk, and percecute his fellow brethren (believers). And the Lord of that servant (Jesus) came on a day that servant was NOT looking for him to come. And the Lord of that servant came on a day when he was not expecting him. And the Lord of that servant (Jesus) appointed him a portion with the unbelivers, this means he took from him his portion with the believers (eternal salvation). A appointed (reassigned him) a portion with the sinners. This clearly proves that a believer can lose their eternal salvation, if they are found in sin when Jesus comes. Slam dunk!

That’s how Conor McGregor broke his leg

Good debate. Interesting thought: remove Romans 9 and 99% of the Biblical basis for Calvinism goes with it.

If there's this much of a debate over Paul's words , what does that tell you about Paul ??? His words are dysnoetas , nonsense , nonsensical , meaningless and/or destructive of good sense and they can lead you into the error of lawlessness , anomia , apostasy , not keeping The Law of Moses

A lot of Bill's arguments were pointless. They were, as he himself admitted, arguments for the existence of a God, which was not the question at stake in this debate. If Erica had wanted to, she could have just replied with, "Ok, there's a God. Now what does this have to do with the topic of creation vs evolution?".

Warren McGrew what would dynamic omniscience look like if A) God we’re not obedient or subject to time, and B) if the future & past were real, but maleable? Is there some sort of compromise that can dynamically put God both inside & outside of time simultaneously? I have no skin in this debate. I think Warren McGrew won the debate as far as showing that you can’t classify Dynamic Omniscience as heresy, though I think Tfan poked enough holes in it so that I agree that the past & future do exist and that God is not bound by time in the same way as man. I think Warrens discussion on the statements of God when He said what will certainly happen if nothing changes were particularly compelling and I’m still working that out in my brain. I think Warren poked enough holes in static omniscience that it also cannot be readily accepted. Daniel 9:23 (NASB95) “At the beginning of your supplications the command was issued, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly esteemed; so give heed to the message and gain understanding of the vision. Hebrews 4:12 (NASB95) For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Here is my take. Neither static nor dynamic seem sufficient on their own. I think time is a created aspect of our created universe. If man is a 4 dimensional being then God is like a 50 dimensional being. I think God exists in superposition both inside & outside of time & is master over it, it is not master over Him. There is nothing fatalistic about time, nor can it inflict itself on God, but God is master of it. I think God has determined that his creation be able to make choices, and those choices influence the path they experience within time. However, God not being bound or subject to time is able to observe our future choices 1 year, 10 years, 100 years from now, and as He makes observations 100 years from now His consciousness in all times become aware of those observations. He can dynamically step into any moment of time and influence those choices by giving us new (new to us) information. When He told David he would certainly die if he stayed, that free choice on God’s part changed the choice that David made and created a new future that Gods future consciousness observed & informed His present. As soon as the decision to act (the thought & intention) was made, it changed the future reality. When God said “let there be light” it changed our physical reality from what was to what is & will be. When God interacts with His creation, it changes. Because we are made in his image, our choices do this as well (albeit on a much more limited scale). As soon as God had the thought & intention to create, he saw the end from the beginning. But because He existed at every point in time simultaneously he could make creative changes to his creation at any time to change reality to suit his pleasure. Some changes were macro, some micro, and some changes were to give us the information to create a new reality for ourselves by making different choices. Isaiah 46:10 (NASB95) Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things which have not been done, Saying, ‘My purpose will be established, And I will accomplish all My good pleasure’; The future exists, and is static, until it changes. It’s like a lump of clay that God knows exactly what it might look like when he is done shaping it, but he still goes through the process of forming it. Each change adjusts the reality of the clay. Left alone, it would always be as it is now, but each interaction of the sculptor changes its present & future. The sculptor is free at any time to change His vision of it, and sometimes He does. He might even form it back into a lump & start over if he likes (Noah). Like the clay, the future is a real thing, but like the clay it is maleable. God created man with the ability to make limited changes, yet He is the prime mover. Some things are unchangeable (such as Christs return), but some things are changeable (whether we choose life or death). What does this change to the nature of Christ inform us about this debate: Philippians 2:5-11 (NASB95) 5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Hebrews 2:9 (NASB95) But we do see Him who was made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, so that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone.

Is the 17th century early church … are you kidding me?

Blessings to you and praying for your channel

2 Timothy 2 KJV 16 “But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.” 2 Timothy 2 16 CJB 16 “But keep away from godless babbling, for those who engage in it will only become more ungodly, 17 and their teaching will eat away at people like gangrene. Hymenaeus and Philetus are among these; 18 they have missed the mark, as far as the truth is concerned, by saying that our resurrection has already taken place; and they are overturning some people’s faith. 19 Nevertheless, God’s firm foundation stands, stamped with these words: “The Lord knows his own,”[a] and, “Let everyone who claims he belongs to the Lord stand apart from wrongdoing.”[b]”

Whoever asked the quantum mechanics question at the end needs to take a chill pill and just focus on if the scriptures are true or not. The bible is presominantly not a book about science, mathematics, etc.

So as a man is in his heart is he... no oopsies. You're in a theological discussion.

Just because Testament and Covenant came from the same Greek word, it does not follow that both have therefore the same meaning. The same Greek word can mean different things, depending on context, like Sozo.

Crazy! How many people here are defending open theism crazy People need to study their Bible

The Greek Septuagint had translated Sheol as Hades pretty all over the place. Acts 2:27 quotes Psalms 16:10, using Hades as the translation of Sheol directly. Hades in the Greek scriptures is the same thing as Sheol in the Hebrew scriptures. In Revelations 20, Hades is emptied with the second ressurection. Those brought out of Hades then face jusgement. Yet, how could they have been placed in Hades if it was a place of torment and punishment unless they were already judged worthy of such punishment? Is God so imperfect a judge that he needs to judge people twice? Also, the wages sin pays is death. This means, one pays for their sins when they die. It doesn't say the wages sin pays is eternal torment. God didn't tell Adam that if he sinned, he would be tormented. He said he would did. The eternal fire confuses many because we lived such sanitized lives today compared to the people back then. Back then, they had to deal with their dead more, with rotting meat, garbage, dead animals, etc. A very common way of dealing with it was to burn it. So, everyone back then would have known just how hard it would be to actually burn things. I remember a cop show where the forensic people were looking at a burned corpse and talking about how the killer was an amateur, because they didn't use nearly enough fuel to actually burn the body completely. This is what the eternal flame means and how people back then would have understood it. The eternal flame will no go out and leave parts of the bodies thrown into it unconsumed. It goes on forever and anything put into it will be completely destroyed so there will be no trace of it left. There will be no more chances. They are gone forever.

God knows it is 3pm because He MADE IT 3pm. Wm. Lane Craig is in error.

This guy said Tiktaalik was a Flathead fish. It is clearly not as it is a Actinopterygii closer to a Lionfish. Tiktaalik is a Sarcopterygii and possesses many precursor anatomical features for tetrapods.

how do you make the claim, that the incarnation is not a change in God, with a straight face? ... unreal.

00:55 Started right out of the gate with the uppercut 👊👊👊 good job.

Kent stated "we cannot go back in time". Completely agree. However, if there is no accepted evidence for evolution, is there any actual evidence for creationism, other than stories or known facts that fit a narrative?

fossils prove the great flood they whole lies are held up by then hidding this factual event WHAT ELSE are they hidding the whole theory on how humans evolved crumbles The earth is NOT millions of yrs old as theyve bashing our ears with for ever 🤦🙄🙄

I suppose if you redefine common understandings of omniscience, orthodoxy, heresy, and time, then anything can be true. This is postmodernism using Christianity as its framework.

1:25:02 "Have we not prophesied in thy name and cast out devils in thy name?!?!"

I think the topic is too narrow, and is probably just losing for the affirmative. Should've just been about if DO is true/false. 🤷

God exists in a 2 dimensional form on thin pages of a borrowed fable.

Direct fossil evidence of lungs in Tiktaalik is not available, that's true because lungs and other soft tissues rarely fossilize. However, the anatomical features and evolutionary context provide strong indirect evidence that it likely had lungs. For example; Tiktaalik's skeletal structure, particularly its ribcage, is robust and expanded. This suggests it had the capacity to support lungs and breathe air, as such a ribcage would help protect and ventilate lungs. Tiktaalik has both fish-like and tetrapod-like features, making it an important transitional fossil. It has a flat skull, eyes positioned on top of its head, and a neck, which are adaptations for a more terrestrial lifestyle, potentially including air breathing. Modern lobe-finned fishes, like lungfish and coelacanths, are closely related to early tetrapods and have both gills and lungs. This suggests that their common ancestors, and thus Tiktaalik, had a similar respiratory system. Lungfish, for example, have a similar body plan and can use lungs to breathe air when in oxygen-poor water. The evolutionary transition from water to land required adaptations for air breathing. The presence of intermediate forms with mixed aquatic and terrestrial features indicates the development of lungs was part of this transition. Tiktaalik fits into this context, ad there is no way around it.

More than 60 fossils of Tiktaalik have been discovered. Tiktaalik had both lungs and gills, had a movable neck pectoral/shoulder separated from the skull, fins with thin ray bones for paddling (like most fish), but also sturdy interior bones to support its body weight and allowing to move itself up in shallow water. Those fins and other mixed characteristics mark Tiktaalik as a crucial transition fossil, from swimming fish to four-legged vertebrates. If you have a hard time to understand how fishes can walk on land, just look up mudskippers. Though, both Tiktaalik and mudskippers are associated with the transition from water to land, they are not directly related to each other. Tiktaalik is ancestor of tetrapods, regardless you like it or not. You can google "the origin of tetrapods" and examining some cladograms for better understanding. The discovery of Tiktaalik was the result of a well-informed and strategic search based on evolutionary predictions and geological knowledge.

Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. I really hope and will pray that Sean comes to the truth. Lord give him eyes to see and ears to hear. ✝️💛

When a Pharisee uses James 2 it always feels like a ravenous wolf trying to devour the sheep. This is a WAR in the spirit. It is a LIFE and DEATH matter. If Sean is right, we are all condemned to death. I cling to the cross of Christ. Lord, have mercy upon me and save me. ✝️🩸

This practice of taking a fossil that represents maybe 1/8th of the animal (or even less) and then “recreating” the entire being and then hatching a fictional story about how it looked, how it moved, how it breathed, what it ate, where it lived, etc. when there is no evidence to support it has to stop. The greater tragedy is this type of thing makes it into school textbooks as if it were fact. Embarrassing.

*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei

Francisco Ayala, a renowned evolutionary biologist and recipient of the National Medal of Science and the 2010 Templeton Prize *(and a former Dominican priest),* recently stated the consensus of the field in these terms [Ayala2010, pg. 49-50]: *The overwhelming majority of biologists accept evolution. Those who know professionally the evidence for evolution* ***cannot deny it.*** *Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and plants is a scientific conclusion* ***beyond reasonable doubt.*** *The evidence is compelling and all-encompassing because it comes from all biological disciplines including those that did not exist in Darwin's time.* In the second half of the nineteenth century, Darwin and other biologists obtained convincing evidence from a variety of disciplines, which had reached early maturity during the nineteenth century: *anatomy, embryology, biogeography, geology, and paleontology. Since Darwin's time, the evidence for evolution* ***has become much stronger and more comprehensive,*** coming not only from traditional sources but also from recent disciplines such as *genetics, biochemistry, ecology, ethology, neurobiology, and molecular biology.* ... ***Because the evidence is so overwhelming,*** ... evidence for evolution no longer engages the interest of biologists except when explaining evolution to the public or arguing with those who refuse to accept evolution. Although not sought and ***no longer needed,*** the evidence for the fact of evolution continues to accumulate. *"How many scientists question evolution?* - sciencemeetsreligion.org" "As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. ***The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming.*** *I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that."* ***"Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true.*** If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things." - Dr Francis Collins. Former head of the Human Genome Project and a Christian. ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles: *"What is the evidence for evolution? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* (A Christian organisation) *"Does the Cambrian Explosion Pose a Challenge to Evolution? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* *"Is Evolution a Theory in Crisis? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* Watch *"DNA Evidence that Humans and Chimpanzees Share a Common Ancestor : Endogenous Retroviruses - Stated Clearly"* (Look for Dr Francis Collins at the end of the video, who was the former head of The Human Genome Project and is a Christian) *"Evolution: Library: Human Chromosome 2"* Watch *"Ken Miller on Human Evolution" - Kurpalac* (Kenneth Miller is a theist) *"Why scientists dismiss 'intelligent design' - Science"* *"15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American"* *"Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions | New Scientist"* *"What the Scientific Community Says about Evolution and Intelligent Design | American Civil Liberties Union"* *"The intellectual vacuity of mathematical arguments against evolution - Why Evolution Is True"* *"Once again: misguided calls for a thorough revamping of evolutionary biology - Why Evolution Is True"* *"Confessions of a former creationist - Trees In Space"*

God's word will always prove true. Of that we can be assured. Every single thing that tries to oppose it will be brought to light. 🙏

I do not affirm dynamic omniscience, and I'm not even into the crossX yet, but TF has completely flopped as far as I'm concerned. He refused to engage with Warren's actual arguments, completely misunderstood everything he said (whether intentionally or accidentally, I'm not sure). He refused to engage with his opponent and continuously argued against his preconceived notion of his opponent. He never actually listened to what Warren was saying.

Which bible creation story do you support? There's two in genesis that contradict each other so at least one is wrong. If you look at the evidence it is obvious the fairy tales in the bible are 100% fiction only believed by people who are uneducated and lack critical thinking skills. I feel sorry for them.

There's a whole set of transitional fossils that show many things, for example, you can see the nose migrate to the top of the head as seen in whales and dolphins.

What most people don't understand is that fossils are rare so it can take a long time to peice together an accurate picture.

Like every open theist/calvinist debate I've ever seen. Call the open theist a heretic but say that you can't actually read the several (hundreds) very plain texts that support it at face value. Who is the heretic? No ancient writer or reader would inject determinism into these passages

Congrats on 25k subs! 🎉

Amazing work Donny, thank you for making this!

According to Genesis 6, God told Noah to take a pair of every sort, all this talk about kind is therefore heretic nonsense

Simple answer to design. Something that has function or proposes.

These people will believe anything they are told no matter how ridiculous.

I'm pre trib and I've heard the arguments and i remain pre trib .

as to Tiktaalik (an alleged transitional species) ... it is a textbook example of Darwinian misrepresentation of evidence. 2022 article: "The Ancient Fish That Got Cold Feet and Returned to Water" "An analysis of fossil remains reveals a species of ancient “fishapod” that transitioned to land only to return to the water." "Life on land isn’t for everyone. Approximately 375 million years ago, the famous “fishapod” Tiktaalik roseae first emerged from the water and explored the shore. At the same time, one of the species’ older relatives attempted a similar transition, only to turn tail and return to its former aquatic lifestyle. This finding, recently reported in Nature, further clarifies the complicated transformation of fish into four-legged, land-living tetrapods and emphasizes that evolution isn’t always a linear process" ==== This is Darwinism, a misrepresentation after a misrepresentation after a misrepresentation .... and lots of extrapolation .... :)))))))

The following is not evidence for evolution it is undeniable and irrefutable proof. Unless you can prove the following false with observable and repeatable experiment, documented, peer reviewed, accepted, registered and published in a major scientific journal then evolution is proved and you are talking batsh#t crazy rubbish. There are 13 randomly attaching endogenous retro-viruses in the same place in man and chimpanzee DNA so the chances of man and chimpanzee not having a common ancestor (and therefore not being cousins from tens to hundreds of millions of years ago) are 1: (for simplicity) the chance of picking the right 13 numbers from a lottery of 6 billion numbers. Or in other words an absolute certainty to the level of the number of atoms in the universe that man and chimpanzee are directly related by common ancestor. And that undeniably proves evolution by the scientific method = observable and repeatable. Answers in Genesis tried to counter it over a decade ago when it came out by saying the attaching wasn't random and the actual scientists responded to them confirming the variety of endogenous retro-virus used was randomly attaching (and provided the viruses scientific designation reference number). What happens in reality is this: You get sick, the viruses attach to your DNA, if that DNA is in a gamete, that gamete is fertilised and produces offspring the endogenous retro-virus marker remains in the DNA for all future generations and eventually, every man and every chimpanzee. Of course it is on the internet in a form which says the same albeit in more complicated terms. Radiometric dating is done by ionization chambers and mass spectrometers, instruments used daily world wide with an impeccable record for accuracy in all fields involving radioactivity and element recognition from medical to nuclear power stations and, industry to the military, policing and hundreds of other fields and as such the fossil record, dated by that method, is totally accurate and by using it we can determine that fossil record can only exist if evolution occurred i.e. the theory cannot be disproved.

I'm glad to see this brutal, crushing takedown of a man who has literally led many young adults into out and out Satanism, DELIBERATELY. His understanding of science is below high school level. His adherence to the pseudoscience speculative ideology of "Evolution" is just a manipulation tactic. Evolution as a hypothetical cause for speciation is dead, now that genetics and epigenetics, and more mass death fossil beds have been discovered. Even if I wasn't a Christian, as a person with some intensive higher education in Biomedical Science, I would be offended by this man's ignorance. There's no such thing as an unbiased position. There's no such thing as an atheist either. Everybody worships something. This guy worships himself, and likely Lucifer as well. He's just another ignorant, Neo-gnostic pagan.

Before one asserts that Mal 3:6 - "For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed." - is a proof text of God's immutability, consider the last part of the verse: The consumption of Israel (Jacob's latter name) was very much on the mind of God in Ex 32 - "Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them." And Moses then implores the Lord to reconsider, and the Lord relents, that is, repents. Why not consider that demonstration of the Lord's change of mind in response to prayer to be that which does not change. The same Lord that listened to Moses in Exodus is willing to change His mind in Mal 3. Hence the children of Israel are not consumed.

Do the whales that jump out of the water onto the seashore to grab a seal meal be considered as transitioning?