Chariot Solutions is the Greater Philadelphia region’s top IT consulting firm specializing in software development, systems integration, mobile application development and training. The Chariot team includes many of the top software architects in the area, with deep technical expertise, industry knowledge and a genuine passion for software development.
Since it was formed in 2002, Chariot has established a flawless track record of successful projects. By using smaller teams of higher-level consultants with complementary specialties, we have been able to develop and deliver more scalable and maintainable solutions for our clients - on time and within budget.
Interesting in working together? Reach us at chariotsolutions.com.
LOL WHAT? 6 Did he really say putting types in code is pointless because we only care about the runtime? Spoken like someone that has never had to work on a software written by dozens of people over a span of 20 years. I should not have to do any mental gymnastics to know what a type of something is when the type can ideally be shown right there. Why add more cognitive load? He called the language designers lazy? Seems like he's the lazy one for not taking the time to write code that'll be understandable to people that are not him A lot of computer science theory is appealing on paper and to talk about, but in real life software, in actually implementing it, the simpler and straightforward something is, the better it is to integrate with other people. Recursive decent parsers are probably the most widely used parsers, but from a theoretical point of view, there are better and faster parsers. But recursive decent is easier to reason about. The fact that functional bros always take a jab at OOP or non functional languages is always funny to me. It's even more funnier when they don't understand why functional programming isn't more main stream. If you guys took your non math/computer sciences courses seriously, you'd see why, easily. It's easy to shit talk about non functional languages because not enough people use functional languages to make noise about its shitty features lol 10/10 talk though. Just shit opinions
"why can't it *just* be this way" well you see.... there's over 40 years of history behind that reason and many architectures in-between. I look forward to new programming languages in 20 years where a young language designer goes "why didn't they *just* do it this way in the 2020's??!?!?!?" Zig is interesting. We'll see how it goes.
I really want to know what Zig brings to the table over a feature-restricted C++. You can do most, if not all of these things in C++, and you don't HAVE TO use the nasty stuff.
I'm not sure, aside from compiling to wasm, what this language innovates on? All these features existed in Scala for example for absolute ages, especially the "I haven't seen it anywhere" Backpassing, which existed in Scala for years and is called for-comprehension. The syntax is just identical.
Oh my God! What a great talk and presentation. My knowledge of Go has now expanded with two more releases! I am surprised at how powerful the interface is. Thank you for sharing this. I will spread this at the Brazilian community here. Hope see more soon and for sure I will take a look at your book. Bests, Marcos. Ow! How do you do your presentation with the run button? I will see if I can figure out at your presentation link, if there is one. :)
Hope you are well. I am sincerely sorry to disturb you. Your videos are fine but your videos are not getting views. Moreover, the number of subscribers to your RU-vid channel is also very low. I checked out your RU-vid channel. I found some problems. 1. SEO Score is very low 2. No Title - Description - Tag SEO friendly 3. No Share Social Media Platform and many problems on your RU-vid Channel. If you do proper SEO of your videos and SEO of your channel, your videos will go viral very quickly. You can generate a good view. Hope you understand my point. I am always ready to solve your problem.
I'm SO pleased that there's finally someone out there among the "movers and shakers" throwing a little shade at the C preprocessor... I've been quietly hating it for about 25 years now.
Found out about htmx two months ago. Building a htmx app after not touching webdev for over 10 years. I am happy not to have wasted so much time on SPA frameworks. I feel so productive 😊
5 месяцев назад
Can there be something like a Virtual Dom for htmx? So you do react-like Dom manipulation on the server and that automatically gets transmitted to the browser.
you dont need a virtual dom with htmx. you change the real dom using the hypermedia returned from the web server. dom manipulation on the server is templating/embedding data from your db into html
What are the 6 of 10 most popular programming languages (3 years ago) that are either C++ or a descendant of C++? Does being a descendant just mean that it has curly braces for block delimiters and variable type before variable name? That makes it a descendant of C. So it has that plus classes?
so this language has tag unions, which are not to be confused with tagged unions. Except they also can be tagged unions, because the tags may have associated types. got it
eliminate also "error handling" and maybe then we will talk about how good your language is... only idiotic program "handles" errors, uses asserts, prints out the stack trace. Good program deal with errors, there should NOT be a condition when program doesn't know what to do. even f*cking "division by zero"
many people in the comment doesn't really get how awesome a language like this means i remember React.js introduction, nobody wanted it, now react & js framework that came to improve upon it run the web C is so horribly bad and weird that it's impossible to maintain, easier to make buggy and unsafe code with it Zig is a language with big balls, it's doing the obvious things that nobody did for decades - Why have build systems that are in another obscure language when you can use the language itself to handle the building - Macros are weird, why not program the compile time stuff with the same language - Generics are compile time stuff, again why create weird syntax for generic typing when you can just program that type in compile time with the same language - allocation and cleanup should always be next to each other - why have some elaborate typing system for exceptions, when an enum for the different kind of errors is much easier to deal with - unit tests are boring and complicated because they are always an afterthought and not made from the get go to be with language, zig does unit testing better than 100% of the languages - std = @import("std") makes so much fucking sense - and zig acknowledge that C have huge codebase, so they built a better tooling for c than c itself has, and you can import header files natively i like Rust, but now i love Zig more, zig have the balls to create a proper language that is not complex like Rust, and doesn't hold your hand and force some set of rules upon you like Rust Borrow Checker But zig has a long way to be mature enough and feature rich
@16:25 I think what Dan meant when he said: "we had the OPPORTUNITY.." is that rebuilding the application again was something easily done by oop not easily done in other applications written in previous paradigms making it experimental a good thing not a bad thing.
My problem with non-native UIs is that they often lack some behaviours and capabilities of native ones. For example, the Java UI file selection dialog doesn't let me perform a right-click action on a folder before selecting it, as well as a lot of other things I would've been able to do with a native equivalent. Some cross-platform multi-windows come with a horrible drag lag due to not issuing a redraw update every tick. They also often don't support half-screen docking by dragging the window to the side. Qt scrollbar, if I recall correctly, misses the feature of the native one that if you drag too far in the perpendicular direction, it wouldn't move at all, preventing an accidental mistake in scroll direction. There's a billion little things like this that just cannot be accounted for by a single ultimate cross-platform UI framework. BUT webpage-based UI seem to have become a nice compromise. A browser provides a sort of 'frontend' (as in 'compiler fronted', i.e. a 'common representation -> native result' transformation), which more often than not relies on native UI components, or at least mimics their behaviour well enough for every platform individually. And the developers get a relatively uniform target representation. So, as much as I dislike javascript and the tendencies it has caused in webapps, I think webpage-based cross-platform UI is a step forward from whatever Java, Qt & etc. tried to do
No offense but. I like Richard Feldman, he is very good presenter. He had been working for a long time with Elm, now he decided to create his own functional programming language. How is Roc different than Elm?
"the software must not harm or fail" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I so wish the industry operated with this viewpoint. Whoo. How about : "the software must not cost anything and all errors must be hidden from upper management"?
70% of speech could be left for your psy. therapist, this reflection has to do a lot w poor communication skills and toxic env at your office and does not answer the question how would you test it.
okay i am a little confused why you would use react native with clojurescript rather than just clojure. since that can run natively on andriod is it because this is a crossplatform app ?
