What was the point? You didn't even begin to cook the fish. We didn't even need to see it before... just to see how it cooked. But nothing. Feeling cheated.
I worked at a store that sold the Maxxum 7000 when I was in college. Pretty sure that was for a control grip. Gave some extra power input for faster flash work.
The issue with the Nikon F4s is focusing ... it's called Hunting ... the focus goes in and out of focus from time to time .. Try another lens ...read the manual . I use my 500mm f4 AFS g , its better than the sigma lens . Good luck . You can try my 500mm if you like to ?
@@laurencemoss8049 yeah the sigma lens isn’t the best, yeah the hunting it does is really unique and not what I would have thought! It’s a beautiful Camera
Had the exact same issue with F4 off ebay. Full sweep but never locked focus - had to return it for refund. reddit couldn't solve issue either /r/AnalogCommunity/comments/13ez4g4/f4_auto_focusing_issues/
You need to get the dioptre set correctly. Up until the F4 this was done by using dioptre correction screw on lenses on the view finder. On the F4 you use the dioptre view finder adjuster - you have to pull it out and adjust accordingly then press it back in when you can focus on the focus screen. First, forget the lens focus, just ensure everything in the view finder is in focus using the dioptre correction dial - it isn't easy to see much in the F4 viewfinder as everything is pretty dark, but persevere. Once you have the dioptre setting correct, then you can focus your lens. But if you have any sense, just buy a Nikon FE.
As soon as Hungary sat back,denying any space, Steve Clarke had no plan B.What he couldhave done was take off Ralston,play Jack Hendry on the right of a back 3,with mckinnie on the left and Hanley in the centre.Play James Forest on the right,as Hungary were doubling up on Robertson on the left.You then could have taken one of the holding mids,Mcgregor or Gilmour and put on a second striker,Shankland-if needed.If not,we still could have played with only Adams as a lone striker.We might still have lost,but the country could have been proud of team for having a go!
I’m only an amateur sportsman so take what I say with a pinch of salt; but there’s been times where I’ve felt niggles before a match and been worried that I won’t be able to compete or might turn a niggle into a full injury, but then I’ve gone on court and been fine and competed. So maybe that’s the mentality of a lot of these players? I suppose it’s a fine line between wanting to compete for the points and money vs making sure you don’t do yourself damage that will cost you more points and money in the long run.
Good morning. I am a 42 year old man who started tennis after moving to the UK. I was 10 but had natural ability. My parents got me involved in tennis via the routes you described. Private lessons, academy tennis and LTA tournaments. For various reasons I dropped out of tennis for social reasons, lack of self esteem and lack of knowledge of how to develop myself. I stopped at 16 / 17 as my standards started declining and actually stopped liking the sport........it's quite deep. I picked up a racket again a year ago and now I'm hooked and obsessed with the sport. But my goodness!!! Lots of social boundaries with the sport and have decided to go 'the lone wolf' route myself in my own development and I stick to singles ......now my issue is my eldest son who is 11 has the bug. And I'm trying to find a way to develop him in the best way and make sure he doesn't come to the same conclusion I did with the sport. I'm not expecting him to turn pro - but I want to give him better opportunities and have a positive relationship with the sport. I've taken allot from your views and opinions. Great vid 👌
Bit rich calling out Andrews research, agenda and debate skills when you cant even recall his full name or make a salient point of your own. I'd stick to cab driving mate. Labelling his comments section racist for agreeing with him too sums up the level of your intellegence.
Andrew said that she had been picked for her skill not colour, but you can’t deny that on a mass scale coloured people / and females are chosen over the white male for diversity reasons Not racist to say literal facts
@@codenamegrimlock7510 it’s only not facts if you give power to feelings over facts. Recently on wwe Smackdown, a white male was demoted and replaced by a black female announcer. Even tho the fans knew he was better at the job I ain’t even saying there is an issue with this, but when this is clearly happening and still arguments are being had over are we diverse enough. I’d argue we are too woke and diverse now.
@@codenamegrimlock7510 Andrew has done a follow up video showing screen shots that show major TV networks committing to specific figures of representation.
What are you talking about!? It was a debate about DEI. She keeps saying that we don't have enough Black people; or we don't have enough Women.... He is arguing against her position. Btw, she was/is in the Top Management roles. She was/is a Recrutment Director & General Manager & ... And how is it possible that she is not "smart enough", but also well educated & in top management roles & on every news channel? She is arguing in the mainstream media all the time. You cannot have it both ways.
This is interesting, you approach a debate with me starting “what are you talking about” if you want to debate with me when we can film it and put on my podcast, however Andrew clearly had an agenda and when she did push back on his narrative he answered with a general answer which Eni didn’t pick up on, she missed many opportunities to nail him and she missed most of them, she was not ready for that debate. Therefore she fell into Andrew’s race baiting traps, like I said he wouldn’t ask Ian Wright or Jermaine jeans those questions.
Sorry my friend you misunderstood me! I am not saying she isn’t smart! I am saying she wasn’t smart enough to answer the questions as if she was she would have seen the trap he set and not took the bait!
@@codenamegrimlock7510 What question she couldn't answer? They had a Discussion about DEI. And she talks about it 24/7. You are basically saying that she is bad at her job. And I agree. It seems that she doesn't know what she is talking about. From the beginning he asked her about Sports. She agreed that there are more non-White people, but said that there are not enough non-White people in the Boardrooms. He replied that there are 17% of non-White people in the top positions which reflects the general population. ... Then he shared his own story at the BBC. And they politely argued about that. He said that there are over 8% of just Black personalities. Which is disproportionate relative to the population. .... He basically just rebutted everything she was saying. He didn't ask her any trick questions.
@@codenamegrimlock7510 Btw, I am watching the video again. He was extremely polite. He didn't interrupt her. He actually agreed with her on some of her points (he probably said, "I agree" & "True", like 20-30 times). He called her very talented.... The whole debate was about DEI. He wasn't attacking her at all.
@@codenamegrimlock7510 Btw, Of course he had a position. He is arguing against DEI. She is promoting DEI. And Andrew guy says that she has no issue with him. She thinks the debate went well. He just thinks that she contradicted herself, or was "moving the goal post". Watch the video again. They have a very polite conversation.
It’s just scary, even the term consent is twisted in todays world. Yes can mean no, maybe can mean yes, no can mean yes. Coercion is a thing that cannot be proven either way, meaning if a man is accused of it he’s guilty even without evidence
