IQ is indeed a narrow obsession. Some people are very money savvy (and become successful business people , and others are very academic (but couldn’t run a successful business, even a small one). Success can be defined in many, many ways.
I’ll Be honest …..dead ☠️ honest !! As this is all based on the “AVERAGE / or MEDIUM” using a Probability & Statistical Bell Curve” Scientifically - MEANING AN ALL READY PROVEN FAAACT !! ASK ANY SCIENTIST !! But the truth is here - as it’s scientifically UNDENIABLE THE MEASURED TRUTH !! Just as Asians have slanted eyes , beautiful yellow skin - yet are the physically smallest of the races !! Africans are built on average a lil more muscular ( longer & thicker bone density ) . Well folks , it’s specifically your “European /Northern Germanic - or Saxon ( not Anglo Tribes)” that have slightly bigger pre-frontal cortex’s of their brains 🧠!! Meaning a slightly bigger Frontal brain mass . This is an ABSOLUTE SCIENTIFIC 🧪 MEASURED FAAAAACT FOR YEARS ON ALREADY !! Their brains 🧠 on average are slightly bigger ( not your European Celtic , Baltic , Frankish , Anglo , Scandinavian , I do not give a damn whom cries racist - BOO - HOO - CRY THEN !! But I just gave you all real SCIENTIFIC FACTS !! The older you all get . The more you will understand this in FULL . Do ur own SERIOUS RESEARCH - DO NOT JUST GO THROUGH CENSORED UTUBE VIDEOS !! After u all do ur correct research ?? Only then reply back !! We are ALL PHYSICALLY CREATED DIFFERENT - PERIOD !! THE FASTER THIS WORLD 🌍 UNDERSTANDS THIS IN FULL ?? THEN THE FASTER THIS WORLD CAN EVOLVE !!
Well, think about this: If blacks were just as smart as Whites on average, then how come *no blacks ever* were intelligent enough to win a Nobel Prize for physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine? Since 1901 there have been over 600 Nobel prizes given out and *not one black ever* won one for the above categories. And no, the Nobel committed does not have any card carrying KKK members so trying to blame racism is out.
You literally just stated that you are no more intelligent than black people. As you unintentionally admitted that you are no more intelligent than the population you're disparaging, you are hereby banned from ever discussing the topic of human intelligence ever again. You're not qualified, as you don't reach the IQ threshold to comprehend the topic.
@@ieetrgun2620 His measure of intelligence is winning a Nobel Prize. Over 99.999999% of people of all races never win a Nobel Prize in their lives, including himself. Not only does his little racist fallacy show that races are equal, but he also unwittingly showed that as he has never won a Nobel Prize, he is no more intelligent than the average black person. That is what I'm saying.
@@NanakiRowan More proof (was not needed but thank you!) that the more stupid and ignorant a person is the more likely they are to call a truth speaker a racist. Thank _God_ that only the most morbidly stupid people on the planet are like this. So thank you again for proving me right about you!
I _know!_ The biggest morons of them all will call someone a racist just for speaking the truth. Praise the Lord that only the lowest of the low do this.
I'm pretty offended, an instructor directed a class to watch this 5 min f'ing the old white people Nazi race science bs, saying the browns are dumb, but (pat on the head and a dog biscuit) the Asians are so smart (a model, really) and the whites, the whites are (naturally) just managing from the middle. Trash. Did she measure peoples skulls' too?
It does make sense that some groups of people are born with more intelligence than others, however I question these experiments because its true that there are a lot of environmental factors at play which would interfere with the results. Asians for example, are well known to have very strict parents who prioritise their kid's education more than others. Then there's the matter of setting the criteria for intelligence. Are these IQ tests agreed upon across the board? It's tough to say and I'm happy to accept the truth but only if its done right. This isnt conclusive proof at all
This Project , this album is my absolute favorite from Björk! She is such an inspiration, her and Sir David Attenborough are true Heroes in our society ❤️🦔🐟
@@NanakiRowan By whom? That's not even his data. He referenced an enormous number of data. Even if the numbers are off, it's a fact that different ethnic group have different IQs. We can only argue currently about the reasons and the margins
@@dakkossman2063 It is his data. The figures are from his book, "IQ and the Wealth of Nations". Many analyses have shown the data he published was fraudulent, or at the very least, dishonest and biased. For example, he used the test scores of 48 mentally disabled *children* living in a group home in *Spain* to represent the national score of Equitorial Guinea. That's just one example. The methodology was so poor that the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association put out a statement that his data should not be used in academic as the conclusions made from it are unsound. That said, yes, I don't think anyone argues that there is a difference in scores between populations.
Boffins geeks nerds weirdos are what keep us simple and uncomplicated in life.... Why fight it when love is all around us ❤❤❤ Naivety is beautiful and STRONGER ❤
If the science in accurate then you can make predictions based on IQ. However that might not be enough to indicated how well someone will do in life. Another thing that is powerful about her work the progressives would have a hard time blaming white america for the social problems of blacks and Hispanics.
Question. How are all white people considered a race? So, are we grouping Germans in with the Irish? That seem like a stretch. Are Spanish people considered white? What about the Portugués? This matters because many Hispanics that score low on IQ tests, are purebred Spaniards. Then their is more genetic diversity in Africa, than any other place on Earth. Is the whole continent considered Black? Seems pretty stupid. Also, is the US, Arabians are considered white, so are they counted in the white average? Lol😢
@@monke9498 Some Logical holes within the idea of a strong consistent correlation between eye que, genetics ,income and success . Lel this should be fun😆!!! Native Americans and South East Asians are much more genetically closer to East Asians and yet they exhibit more average disparities in eye que scres with E. Asians than E.Asians do with Yts. Yts and East Asians have more genetic deviations than this two mentioned populations Qtar ,Saudi Arabia are one of highest income countries in the world per the average person yet Qatar has an average of 78 which is among the lower average clusters in the world. Same applies to Saudi. How does this make any sense?? Eye que and income have to consistently correlate right??? Egypt has an average of 80 yet it was among the earliest advanced civilizations to arise and springing up such a civilization would require above average que. If eye que had any influence and always dictated results then they should be a superpower in the mordern world. So what happened? You want to tell me that their collective eye que decreased?? Que is highly genetic and people don't just decrease in innate abikities in such a drastic magnitude ...this shouldn't be possible if the bearing of eye que is majorly genetic . Europe was estimated to have an average of 70 at the start of the 20th century while at this time they were basically revolutionizing advancements left right and centre and were shaping how the Mordern world was going to be. So why all this fluff from genetic priests about how societies with a collective average of low 80s and 70s wouldn't manage to develop or prosper. Lastly define "success". Is it the western definition of being fullfilled in income and wealth or acheiving materialistic things or having some strong recognition in society. Success is a broad term and just doesn't narrow down to this things.
@@jacksweeklymusicreviews3411yes! She said in an interview that she’d had a massive crush on him for years, so was a little intimidated at first Attenborough also said that he found her attractive and charming
Some Logical holes within the idea of a strong consistent correlation between eye que, genetics ,income and success . Lel this should be fun😆!!! Native Americans and South East Asians are much more genetically closer to East Asians and yet they exhibit more average disparities in eye que scres with E. Asians than E.Asians do with Yts. Yts and East Asians have more genetic deviations than this two mentioned populations Qtar ,Saudi Arabia are one of highest income countries in the world per the average person yet Qatar has an average of 78 which is among the lower average clusters in the world. Same applies to Saudi. How does this make any sense?? Eye que and income have to consistently correlate right??? Egypt has an average of 80 yet it was among the earliest advanced civilizations to arise and springing up such a civilization would require above average que. If eye que had any influence and always dictated results then they should be a superpower in the mordern world. So what happened? You want to tell me that their collective eye que decreased?? Que is highly genetic and people don't just decrease in innate abikities in such a drastic magnitude ...this shouldn't be possible if the bearing of eye que is majorly genetic . Europe was estimated to have an average of 70 at the start of the 20th century while at this time they were basically revolutionizing advancements left right and centre and were shaping how the Mordern world was going to be. So why all this fluff from genetic priests about how societies with a collective average of low 80s and 70s wouldn't manage to develop or prosper. Lastly define "success". Is it the western definition of being fullfilled in income and wealth or acheiving materialistic things or having some strong recognition in society. Success is a broad term and just doesn't narrow down to this things.
Jensen was asked if he was racist and his answer was i thought about that a lot and i've concluded it doesn't matter The bell curve book charles Murray The book is about the importance of intelligence in everyday life its an empirical book It has Statistical analysts a very large databases that show that essentially iq score or their equivalent are correlated to all kinds of social problems and social benefits and that itself didn't cause the controversy of the book Was about one chapter about average difference in mean scores between black Americans and white Americans and that's the term the used even to this day out the somewhere Historically for decade its been observed that disadvantage groups scores on average lower than Caucasians on academic tests tests for mental ability and especially on iq tests and the difference is a standard deviation which is about fifteen points which is a substantial difference In this one chapter they assert clearly and unambiguously that whether this average difference is due to genetics or not they are agnostic they don't know Because you wouldn't treat somebody differently knowing that there was a genetic component or not because that's a group average finding every individual has to be treated as an individual you cant make any assumptions about what that person's intellectual ability might be from the fact of average group difference ,they're very clear about this What is the flit effect ? James Flynn published a set of analysis going back a couple of decades when he first notice this that iq scores when you looked over the years seem to be drifting up now this was not unknown to the people who make the test because they renorm the test periodically and they have to renorm the test periodically because what ten items correct meant relative to other people 50 years ago is not the same as ten items mean relative today people are getting things more correct now the scores have been drifting up about three points iq scores have been drifting up about three points per decade .this is not a personal effect this is a cohort effect was not for an individual What this presented was a great mystery two questions first is its effect of the 50% of the variance that's a g factor or on the other 50% and there's evidence that it is a g factor effect. Second what on earth cause this and doesn't this mean intelligence in g factor cannot be genetic because the scale of natural selection is much more longer than a couple of decades ago and so its been used to try and undermine the idea that there would be a genetic influence on intelligence , but certainly it can be the flynn effect can affect the non-genetic aspects of intelligence because genes account for maybe 50% of the variance may be higher could be as high as 80% for adults Really the latest research on this view based on date in health care and advances in nutritions and there's evidence that its possible reversing It's not an unreasonable connection but does it negate the idea that there's a genetic influence not logically at all but it's very interesting so that if you take an iq test today but you take the score and use the tables that were available in 1940 you're going to wind up with a much higher iq number so are we really smarter than a couple of generations ago No but we might be able to solve problems better a little better and make use of our g better because of things like sesame street and other curriculums in schools more people are going to school so there are a lot of factors here to disentangle Its impossible it disentangle nature vs nurture The genetics is a very high influence and the environment is less than people believe most people believe the environment plays a big role im not so sure IQ is a score and a iq score is a very good estimate of the g factor ,You can't measure g directly There's no direct measure 1850s all over again
I hate when people try to say this is WS propaganda when WS are just as keen to hide this information because it essentially points to Askenazi Jews being 2 standard deviations above the average white person.
I believe she's not allowed her inner child to escape into adulthood. Instead she nourishes it often in play. To see which regions of her brain are most active when she's composing and experimenting with sound and technology might surprise the neuro- boffins. Many wondrous people have existed, that little lady is up there alongside them. She is an enigma wrapped in a soft but crunchy conundrum. I would love to just spend some quality time with her. She fascinates me.
But people will use this fact to spew fvlse jargon that blvck people can't be genius3s....when we have unrecognized Kenyan innovators like this who will unfortunately go under the radar due to their unsupportive govt ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uZINsa4T_9M.html
Why isn't this documentary more widely known? Nature, music, and even some science. Three of my most favorite things, together with two people who are the some of the most interesting in those things.
she is not pretentious, this album is a masterpiece and did exactly its purpose. showed how music making shouldn’t be put in a box, made with technology & nature
