The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is the UK's largest organisation for funding research on economic and social issues, supporting independent, high quality research which has an impact on business, the public sector and the third sector. We are part of UK Research and Innovation (www.ukri.org). We regularly publish videos presenting ESRC-funded research and its impact.
This video has nothing whatsoever to do with refugees. Refugees aren't even mentioned. It all about stopping useless parents from abusing their kids when under a bit of pressure.
This video has nothing whatsoever to do with refugees. Refugees aren't even mentioned. It all about stopping useless parents from abusing their kids when under a bit of pressure.
Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GHGs and it becomes much like the Moon, an airless, arid, barren rock with no water vapor, clouds, snow, ice or oceans, no more 30% albedo and hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. This is NOT what greenhouse theory says. It is what Nikolov, Kramm and UCLA Diviner say. The K-T diagram (TFK_bams90) counts 63 W/m^2 upwelling LWIR twice: 160 - 17 - 80 = 63 once and 396 - 333 = 63 second. LoT1 allows only one, the real one from the sun. Erase the 396/333/63 from the graphic and the balance is unaffected and the GHG warming loop disappears. 342 arrives from the sun, net albedo 70% or 240 makes it into the atmosphere, net/net 160 arrives at the surface. Per LoT1 160 is ALL!! that can leave. The 396 is “extra” appearing out of nowhere. The 396 is a theoretical “What if?” calculation for a BB at 16 C that serves as the denominator of the emissivity ratio: 63/396=0.16. IR instruments do not measure power flux, they measure temperature and infer W/m^2 by assuming emissivity and assuming 1.0 or .95 is assuming wrong. As demonstrated by experiment the surface cannot and does not radiate as a BB and as such there is no “extra” energy for the GHGs to warm whatever. For the experiment write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ No RGHE, no GHG warmng, no CAGW or CO2 driven climate change.
Really impressive collaboration here highlighting that government policies must be informed by high quality evidence supported by analytical expertise.
